Self Driving Uber Crashes In Arizona, Company Halts Pilot Program

Sam McEachern
by Sam McEachern

Uber’s infamously embattled autonomous car division took another hit Saturday after one of its self-driving Volvo XC90 test cars was involved in an accident in Tempe, Arizona. The technology company has since halted the pilot program, parking its self driving fleets in Arizona, Pittsburgh and San Francisco until further notice.


The crash occurred when a Ford Edge failed to yield to the Uber test vehicle as it made a left hand turn onto a major arterial road. The vehicle was in self-driving mode at the time of the accident and two “safety” drivers were also present in the front seats. The Uber wasn’t blamed for the crash and no serious injuries were reported. A tweet from news agency Fresco News shows the XC90 test car rolled on its side with a heavily damaged Edge sitting in the background.

“We are continuing to look into this incident and can confirm we had no back-seat passengers in the vehicle,” an Uber spokesperson said in a prepared statement.

Uber’s self driving car pilot program received some poor press in December after test vehicles were spotted running red lights, breezing through pedestrian crosswalks and nearly hitting other cars in San Francisco. Those incidents prompted California state regulators to order Uber to stop all autonomous car testing until it could obtain a proper permit for operating self-driving cars.

News of the collision comes just days after Uber president Jeff Jones quit the company and became another in a growing list of talent that has jumped ship in recent months. In February, one of its top engineers, Anthony Levandowski, quit the company after news surfaced that he had stole Google self-driving car offshoot Waymo’s LIDAR circuit-board technology. This prompted Waymo to file a lawsuit against Uber and its self-driving trucking division, Otto.

[Source: CNBC/Reuters]

Sam McEachern
Sam McEachern

More by Sam McEachern

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 29 comments
  • Sector 5 Sector 5 on Mar 26, 2017

    When the first vehicles appeared wasn't there a pedestrian in front with a red flag? Well that's what we're going through now - the red flag phase.

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Mar 27, 2017

    Q: If the Uber car wasn't blamed for the accident, and if AV companies are so eager to brag about their cars' future capabilities (Uber, Tesla, Volvo, Ford, etc), then *why* did Uber pull the vehicles? A: Here's why - because someday, the liability *will* fall upon the AV mfr of an SAE Level 4 or 5 vehicle, perhaps for the occupants inside the vehicle, not just outside it. If the company was truly confident, they'd put that XC90 on its wheels and send it back out into the fray. I bet those guys who were 'slightly' injured are second-guessing their contract not to sue (which I'm sure they have).

    • See 1 previous
    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Mar 27, 2017

      @jmo Of course, what was I thinking. Let me rephrase: "I bet those guys who were ‘slightly’ injured are second-guessing their role as guinea pigs."

  • The Oracle What a rash of clunkers.
  • Zerofoo Not an autonomous system, but the blind spot assist in my CX-90 is absolutely flummoxed by TWO left turn lanes and shouts at me because there are cars in the lane I'm not in and have no intention of using.
  • Jimble AMC was hardly flush with cash when they bought Jeep. Ramblers were profitable in the early 60's but the late 60's were pretty lean years for the company and they had to borrow money to buy Jeep. Paying off that debt reduced the funds available for updating the passenger cars and meeting federal air quality and safety mandates, which may have contributed to the company's downfall. On the other hand, adding Jeep broadened the company's product portfolio and may have kept it going in those years when off roaders were selling better than economy cars. AMC had a couple flush years selling economy cars in the 70's because of oil shocks but that was after buying Jeep, not before.
  • Mnemic It doesnt matter who. These things are so grossly overpriced that they only need to sell a handful of them to cover the development costs. Why? Selling overpriced luxury cars is literally all of Germanys economy.
  • Jalop1991 nope. A broken taillight will total the car.
Next