FTC Hunting for Abuse in Auto Lenders' Implementation of Kill Switches

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Finance companies have begun using ignition kill switches and tracking devices, which allow them to disable and then easily locate vehicles for repossession. Some of the devices even remind borrowers when they’ve missed a payment. According to PassTime, a company that sells such devices, somewhere between 35 and 70 percent of cars financed on subprime loans have some variant of the hardware installed.

Now the the Federal Trade Commission is looking into whether these automotive finance companies are illegally harassing consumers with poor credit by imposing the hardware onto their vehicles — potentially violating their privacy while also garnering unnecessary intimidation from banks.

Currently under the consumer protection agency’s microscope are the Michigan-based Credit Acceptance Corp., and Arizona’s DriveTime Automotive. Bloomberg reported that the FTC has asked for information from both companies about the devices. DriveTime spokesman Chris Piper claimed his company doesn’t use kill switches but that most financed vehicles have a pre-installed GPS system.

For the FTC, the issue isn’t so much that the devices themselves are being illegally installed but that debt collectors might threaten using them to prematurely deactivate or repossess a vehicle before they have the legal grounds to do so. It’s a problem that has already arisen without the new devices. In 2014, Consumer Portfolio Services settled with the FTC for $5.5 million over allegations that it had been harassing delinquent customers by calling them and saying they were coming to repossess the vehicle long before those actions could be authorized.

Credit Acceptance has been issued five subpoenas or regulatory demands for information since 2014, including one from the Maryland attorney general requesting specific information over its repossession policies. The Department of Justice has also subpoenaed other lenders, including General Motors’s finance unit and the auto lender Santander Consumer USA.

Most companies have lowered their lending standards in recent years and and number of loans, and delinquencies, have increased as a result. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, roughly 6 million people are over three months late on their car payments as of last December. That accounts for $1.16 trillion in outstanding payments, a 45 percent increase since the final quarter of 2008.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 42 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Feb 27, 2017

    Another article I read about these a few years back talked about how some dealers neglected to disable the kill switches after the loans were paid off, resulting in some buyers having their cars shut down mistakenly, not to mention electrical problems related to hacking up the wiring during installation.

  • Wally109 Wally109 on Feb 27, 2017

    What disturbs me the most is seeing finance companies and lots hitting people with good credit with bad loans just because they can. I had a buddy at work who got hit with a bad loan. We looked up his credit score and history, and there was no reason beyond shear greed and chicanery for his interest rates and payments. He qualified for multiple discounts and incentives that they just didn't bother applying. They didn't even bother trying to stretch out the loan terms to make it "look" like a good loan. They jacked up his rates to sky high on a 66 month term on a new T&C. He managed to refinance with better terms, but it was shocking to see. Basically he walked in, negotiated good terms, went home with his van. A week later they called back, said financing had fallen through, but they had found a new finance company that was close to his original figures. He came back sign a few extra papers to finalize. They rigged the new papers without all his discounts and previously agreed to terms, and trusted that he wouldn't catch all the changes, wouldn't remember everything he previously fought for. When he noticed a a few things were off they hit him with, "these are the changes the new finance company insisted on,". Finally they trusted that'd he'd just sign the papers instead of trying to turn in a van that he'd already been driving for two weeks, that had already picked up about 1000 miles and a couple kid-spills and small scratches. This is becoming a very common thing; people driving off in a new car, only to be called in a week or two later and told that the financing had fallen through, had to be modified. If I ever buy a new car, I'm going to leave it parked in front of the dealership door until ALL paperwork is signed and finalized. If they so much as look at me wrong, "Here's your car back, shrinkwrap and all. Piss off and die."

    • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Feb 28, 2017

      A NYC Toyota dealer did exactly that to my mom. She bought an MR2 post divorce (Mom's Baby Ferrari, we called it-red, too) and the dealer called her in a week with that exact story. Not realizing that he wasn't dealing with a bubblehead, they were surprised that that was her response. "Oh, if there are any changes, I don't agree to them, I don't want to cause you any trouble, so you can send someone to pickup the car today. I'll leave the keys with the doorman". They didn't call back.

  • Rrp138519787 If Jeep wanted to re-introduce the Wagoneer name, they just should have named the Grand Cherokee L the Wagoneer instead, and done a little bit more styling differentiation. They could have done a super deluxe version as the Grand Wagoneer. But all Wagoneers would have been the three row version as the primary product differentiation. And would cause less confusion for consumers overall.
  • D The only people who have TDS, which I assume is Trump Derangement Syndrome, are the MAGOTS who have been brainwashed to love him. They Know Not What They Do.
  • The Oracle The updated Model Y beat this copy to market.
  • ToolGuy™ I respect what the seller is doing, but this vehicle is not for me. (Seller doesn't care, has two people lined up already.)
  • SCE to AUX How well does the rear camera work in the rain and snow?
Next