Hammer Time: Keys

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

$2, $20, $200. $2000. Which one of the four would you like to pay? I always liked to opt for that simple $2 key. A crafted piece of metal cut to fit another crafted piece of metal. Turn the key for 20 years and enjoy a simple solution. But not everyone thinks that way.

Certain manufacturers like to put little chips in their keys to prevent theft. GM has been a long time practitioner of this art. Ford began in earnest around 1998. How do I know about Fords? It’s an absolute pain to get chip keys for a Taurus these days. You have to bring the vehicle to the dealer and have them program it. If it’s older than a 2000 you’re doubly screwed. Ford’s key database is kaput for vehicles before Y2K, which means you better have a first name relationship with a local locksmith.

Toyota used to be the kings of simple… before they created Lexus. Then a lot of the cost DNA started to go into regular Toyota products. The $2 key that I used for my 1994 Toyota Camry is peanuts compared with the $100+ key/fob for my mom’s 2003 Toyota Camry. Yet that’s child’s play compared with the $700 key/fob combination for a 2005 Lexus LS430.

What’s the difference? Nothing except a couple of vague piece of anti-theft technology and a few clickers. I have yet to see any cost benefit study that justifies the dealer prices for a chip key and fob. Between losing a loyal customer and replacing cheap metal, silicon and plastic for a 60,000% profit, which one’s worth more?

The key is of course! Then there are the uber-keys. You lose a key to a Saab and you better be praying to St. Anthony, Patron Saint of Lost Things. Check out the discount prices for a pair of Saab keys. Most Saabs on the road now aren’t worth that much.

Bad Swedes have bad keys. Volvo keys of recent vintage also tend to be a bit on the pricier side. Most Volvo dealers will charge about $300 for two ounces worth of dealer serviced metal and plastic. Not bad at all for late model vehicles. Especially compared to the Saab. But keep in mind you can also buy about 3000 pounds worth of a scrapped Volvo 240 or 850at an impound sale for the same price… with a key.

One of my family members, more than likely the dog, misplaced the keys to a Mercedes S500 a year ago. I ended up in hock to Mercedes for $200 thanks to that cosmic screw up. Every six months or so I have to deal with this headache called lost keys. The $10 for an old Toyota or Chrysler doesn’t bother me at all. $100 for a Ford or Buick chip key bothers me a bit. Anything more and I’m ready to pray, and surprisingly it works most of the time. Just not for a Mercedes.

Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Corey Lewis For those who would enjoy some long-form Wagoneer video content, Vice Grip Garage has an installment on a 1967 model with an interesting combination: The Buick Dauntless V8 and a three-on-the-tree manual.Derek incorrectly cites in the video that the Dauntless arrived in 1968, it was actually 1966 ( Directory Index: Jeep/1966_Jeep/1966_Jeep_Wagoneer_Brochure). Likely he looked at the Wiki, which is incorrect. However, he is correct in saying the V8 would've been paired only to an automatic transmission. This three-speed manual Borg Warner with V8 was a hurried build with what was available, or some sort of special order at the time. What surprised me was the incredible smoothness of the ancient Buick V8.https://youtu.be/hXu4MS-IKsk?si=dVd-E8hHGtCiQW2Z
  • Slavuta --------- 1990 Honda Prelude -- 2026 Honda PreludeWeight 2,700 lbs -- 3,242 lbsEngine 2.0L inline-four, 135 hp -- 2.0L hybrid inline-four, 200 hpTorque 130 lb-ft -- 232 lb-ft0-60 mph 7.5 seconds --- 6.5 secondsQuarter Mile 15.4 seconds --- 15.3 seconds---Basically, with all the refinements, only marginal gain in performance. But I am sure that there is huge loss of feel.
  • Slavuta The whole point of a car like this is the manual transmission. Rest is history
  • Buickman Bag Man Wheels
  • The Ayatollah of Rock n Rolla For $4000 more you can get the Civic Type-R which has 100 more HP, a legit manual transmission, and is much more practical for every day driving. They decided to make a less practical car with none of the benefits of being less practical. People don't buy sporty coupes for economy. They buy them for style and performance. Neutering this thing with less horsepower and less fun due to the omission of a proper manual is the dumbest move I've seen Honda ever do. They'll probably say they did it to not cannibalize type-R sales, but really, the two models would appeal to two different buyers if their specs were comparable. The Civic would appeal to the 30 something dads who want something practical but still fun. The Prelude would appeal to the 20 something single guys, as well as the 40 something empty nesters who no longer require the practicality and want something fun.Way to completely miss the mark Honda. What's next? Gonna reintroduce the S2000 as an EV using the Nissan Leaf powertrain?
Next