How to Make Money From GM's Chapter 11

Ken Elias
by Ken Elias

There are winners in every financial disaster. There are always a few folks– heroes or scoundrels depending on how they make their profits– who understand that the Chinese symbol for danger and opportunity are one and the same. GM’s impending bankruptcy (and likely Ford as well) will produce some winners. But not without serious financial and psychological risk to those who seek their fortune from misfortune. For those of you with a robust constitution, here’s one potential game plan for GM’s C11. First, some background for those uninitiated in the ways of the American automobile business…

The new car business has always been a boom or bust industry. There’s no such thing as steady growth; sales go up or down in multi-year cycles. During the last decade, Detroit’s fobbed-off excess production on rental car companies, commercial fleets and retail buyers. The strategy helped maintain cash flow. But it distorted sales levels and became a pattern of value destruction. Worse, the automotive sales cycle is now at new lows, with as many as four million units sliced off a “false” peak of nearly 17 million units just a few years ago.

The car business depends on the availability of credit at every level. GM will have to obtain new financing– either from the government or private debt/equity–- to remain in business in North America. Its dealers will need floorplan and buyers of retail paper. It’s a chicken or egg scenario. No one will lend to GM-brand dealers and customers if there’s any question of whether the parent company can stay in business. Even then, it’s still riskier than lending to Toyota dealers and customers. The only variable will be product pricing; GM’s vehicles will have to be priced accordingly to make up for the extra cost of the financing and bankruptcy risk.

And that’s the opportunity. Buy Chevrolet and Cadillac (and Ford) dealerships now and into 2009 at fire sale prices from distraught dealers. It’s the bottom of the sales cycle and credit is not available. A firestorm of distress that will pass. One just needs the capital to survive the first few months after the filing. New car sales will still be depressed overall, and even worse for GM and Ford due to consumer and lender uncertainty. But that’s temporary– especially if GM follows the previously predicted prescription and launches a series of massive TV advertising and cut-rate pricing (like distress sale levels). Honor the warranty. Keep the flag raised – don’t surrender.

Within eighteen months or so, the recession will end. Banks will again lend and get greedy to find new revenue streams. GM will still be around, producing fewer cars only for its two remaining brands. But those brands will have the best vehicles from across the entire GM lineup.

Chevy will offer the following: Aveo, Cruze, Malibu, Impala, Lucerne (nee Buick), Camaro and Corvette. And maybe a Volt or two. Its Traverse, Tahoe, Avalanche, and Suburban models also remain. But the truck business– that’s where GM will still score (as will Ford) big profits. The housing business drives the pick up truck market and it still belongs to the domestic brands. Housing will come back and so will the truck market. Chrysler will no longer be alive to bother anyone. Chevy will still fight with Ford for light pickups, but at least GMC down the street will be boarded-up and closed.

Likewise, Cadillac will remain as a luxury brand incorporating the best in engineering and design from Detroit. No corners are scrimped, no more Cimmaron mistakes. Rededicated to its roots as the “Standard of the World,” GM’s ability to reshape its mark will continue, especially free from the distraction of the GM dysfunctional brand family.

The surviving GM dealers will have two brands offering complete and distinct vehicles without suffering from internecine warfare. GM, under new executive management and with new owners (maybe even private equity players) will be smaller in North America. But they’ll have products that meet or beat the foreign competition. And with its restructuring, GM can again be profitable at smaller volumes.

It’s a classic “buy low, sell high” strategy. There will be no shortage of Chevrolet and Cadillac stores for sale soon, most for real estate value only or less. Better stores, within markets having significant units in operation already, have a base of customers needing warranty work and service that can keep a store alive. And the used car business, when run right, provides a stream of profits as well.

Assuming GM it makes it through Chapter 11, avoiding Chapter 7 liquidation, the value of remaining Chevrolet and Cadillac stores will soar. Easy money– if you know how to run a car dealership and can stomach the risk. Anyone ready to bankroll me?

Ken Elias
Ken Elias

More by Ken Elias

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Kjc117 Kjc117 on Oct 17, 2008

    Once Obama becomes Prez he and the Democraps wil bail out GM, Ford, and Chrysler. With Lutz, RW, BN, JL, MF, and company laughing all the way to the bank. This is how you make money off the peoples!

  • George B George B on Oct 19, 2008

    Why would a customer buy a new domestic car in the next couple years? There are too many good used cars on the market for customers with cash or good credit. For living paycheck-to-paycheck customers, Toyota can finance deals in ways Detroit can't. I see a better business in independent off-warantee vehicle repair for customers who are delaying the purchase of new cars. The opportunity is hiring away the best service technicians from dealers for failing brands. Top talent will be on sale.

  • SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
  • Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.
  • JRED My dad has a 2005 F-150 with the dreaded 5.4 that he bought new. 320k miles on the original engine and trans and it's still not only driving, but driving well. He's just done basic maint, including spark plugs and ignition modules. Interior is pretty ratty now but who cares? Outlier I know, but that is a good truck.
  • MaintenanceCosts It is nearly 20 years later and this remains the most satisfying Hyundai product I've driven. It got a lot of middling reviews at the time but the 3.3 V6 was buttery, the transmission shifted well, and the ergonomics were fantastic.
  • Steverock PT Cruiser with the 2.4 turbo. I bought one new in 2004, and it was quick. It was kind of dorky, but it was fun to drive and had lots of room for stuff. My wife drove it to work one day with the parking brake on, and it was never the same after that. Traded it in on a 2005 Mazda6 wagon.
Next