Scorpio Review

Agent K
by Agent K

Test driving a vehicle on India’s rugged roads requires a different set of priorities. Put it this way: after two weeks and over 4000kms in the "all-new" Mahindra & Mahindra Scorpio, no part of my body was crying out for chiropractic manipulation. This proves two things. First, the Scorpio is an extremely comfortable long-distance cruiser over tortured tarmac. And second, I'm not getting signs of early arthritis; I’ve just been driving the wrong car.

The latest incarnation of Mahindra's home-grown utility vehicle is better looking machine than the previous gen. While M&M haven’t altered to the Scorpio’s basic shape or proportions, new details add some much-needed aggression. The Indigo Marina-style “tower lamps” adorning the Scorpio’s D-pillars are particularly dramatic (sadly, they’re simple reflectors rather than variable brake force indicators), while the Subaru-style hood scoop is a surprisingly effective (if only visually) addendum.

Inside, M&M opted for a two-tone look. Although the Scorpio’s fire-resistant beige and floral seating fabric may be a bit feminine for your average SUV driver, the combination of light colors accentuates the cavernous space within. Your eight and bit lakhs buys you all the mod cons: an MP3-compatible stereo with SD card and USB ports (an Indian first), two phone charging jacks, enough cupholders and cubbies for a major expedition, heated this, adjustable that, power so on.

I certainly could have lived without the Scorpio’s “voice assist;” an electronic nanny that reminds you when the doors aren’t shut properly, your seat belt isn’t securely fastened or the fuel tank’s sucking on fumes. The Americans roundly rejected this endlessly annoying idea back in the ‘80’s; this is not the time or place to bring it back. At the very least, Mr. Mahindra should sample that chick from the TV adverts (so to speak).

The oil burner nestled in the Scorpio’s Jeep-like nose (roots!) remains unchanged– which is no bad thing. Mahindra’s 2.6-liter turbo-charged and intercooled common rail diesel is a reliable engine that develops 115bhp @ 3800rpm. More importantly (at least for a two-and-half-ton SUV), the mill stumps up 28.3kgm of torque between 1700-2200rpm. That’s enough twist to put 140kmph on the clock and help the Scorpio pass slower traffic with relative ease.

That’s provided you can engage third gear. Every now and then, the Scorpio’s five-speed gearbox refused to surrender this cog. It didn't happen that often, but it happened often enough (to three drivers) to make overtaking a more nerve-racking experience that needs be. Equally worrying, the Indian SUV isn't exactly gainly above 100 to 110 kph. Karma lives between 70 and 90 kph, where both on-road composure and fuel efficiency are maximized.

Although Mahindra’s advertising claims 43 changes from old Scorpio to new, there’s only one really worth mentioning: the model’s new multi-link rear suspension. For that alone, the 'All-New' tag is fully justified.

The last gen Scorpio handled like an old-school American luxury car; the SUV’s suspension simply couldn’t cope with the immense physical loads generated through the turns. The new Scorpio handles more like an American SUV, albeit a more modern example.

The roly-poly Scorpio wouldn’t be my first choice for the ghats around Chiplun on the NH17, but it’s a whole lot safer and more predictable in its responses than the old brick. During the routine "avoid getting crushed by a bus" swerves on Kerala’s narrow roads, I never felt I was in any danger of examining the road surface from the side window.

At Muzhipallingad, the Kerala tourism department graciously afforded us the opportunity to drive on the beach. A combination of 16” tubeless tires and plenty of low-down grunt kept us from getting bogged down. A brief swim in the Arabian Sea didn’t halt our progress. It did, however, leave an engine bay full of sand— which may account for the speedo (mechanical not swimwear) going wonky for a bit.

Afterwards, the Scorpio climbed the surrounding hills on some truly terrible roads with no major issues. The coil springs gobbled up broken surfaces without complaint, or, as I’ve mentioned, torturing our spines. Equally important, when we weren’t enjoying sea breezes, the Scorpio’s powerful aircon kept both front and rear passengers calm, cool and collected.

On the Western Express Highway, the Scorpio feels massive. As do the fuel bills. We achieved around 11 to 12km per liter of diesel. The Hyundai Terracan with its bigger (and better) engine delivers the same fuel economy.

Still, the Mahindra and Mahindra Scorpio is a complete package: a refined cruiser, a capable mountain mule, and a competent highway cruiser. It’s no surprise BBC World Wheels named the Scorpio their car of the year back in ’03, or that M&M figures the diesel Scorpio will find willing customers in the United States. Provided they price it right, I feel comfortable with its chances.

What would you pay for this vehicle in the U.S.?


Click here to vote


Click here for poll results

Agent K
Agent K

More by Agent K

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 33 comments
  • ThisWas ThisWas on Jul 05, 2007

    Someone mentioned the Isuzu Trooper. I bought a new '88 Trooper II with a 2.6L four. Basic transportation, and we kinda liked it. Isuzu split with me the cost of an expensive cylinder head repair. But what finally convinced me to dump the truck was the constant breakage of the wheel studs. These were expensive to repair (labor, not parts) and although I drove around a lot with only 4 studs on one or more hubs I had to have them all in place to pass inspection. Moral of the story is that expensive repairs make a cheap truck an albatross. Lots of my neighbors bought a Trooper; no one bought a second one. No Mahindras for me.

  • CRConrad CRConrad on Jul 20, 2007

    The author, via Frank W:

    ...depending on the Dollar-Rupee exchange rate, which isn’t terribly good for the Rupee right now.to which "Seldomawake" replies:Frank, my understanding is that the rupee is doing quite well, mostly because the dollar is saggingGuys, I think the author meant precisely that the dollar is "sagging": From an exporting-to-USA standpoint, a *strong* Rupee is bad for the Indians. It means that they won't get as many Rupees for each car they sell in the USA, where they get paid for them in US Dollars.
  • SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
  • Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.
  • JRED My dad has a 2005 F-150 with the dreaded 5.4 that he bought new. 320k miles on the original engine and trans and it's still not only driving, but driving well. He's just done basic maint, including spark plugs and ignition modules. Interior is pretty ratty now but who cares? Outlier I know, but that is a good truck.
  • MaintenanceCosts It is nearly 20 years later and this remains the most satisfying Hyundai product I've driven. It got a lot of middling reviews at the time but the 3.3 V6 was buttery, the transmission shifted well, and the ergonomics were fantastic.
  • Steverock PT Cruiser with the 2.4 turbo. I bought one new in 2004, and it was quick. It was kind of dorky, but it was fun to drive and had lots of room for stuff. My wife drove it to work one day with the parking brake on, and it was never the same after that. Traded it in on a 2005 Mazda6 wagon.
Next