Ford Halts F-150 Lightning Production for the Rest of 2024

by Chris Teague

Published: October 31st, 2024

ford halts f 150 lightning production for the rest of 2024

The Ford F-150 Lightning debuted to strong demand and long wait times, but the truck has since seen a slowdown. The Blue Oval has seen lower-than-expected demand for the electric pickup, leading it to halt production through the end of the year.

Ford said it would shutter production for seven weeks starting at the end of the day on November 15. It has already informed suppliers of the decision and said, “We continue to adjust production for an optimal mix of sales growth and profitability.”

This is the second Lightning-related production pause this year. At the beginning of 2024, The Blue Oval slashed output by half, cutting around two-thirds of its workforce at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center. Following that, the truck saw a stop-ship order while Ford worked to remedy an undisclosed quality issue.

Despite those challenges, Ford has actually seen an increase in Lightning sales this year, with a jump of 86 percent through September. That said, the Tesla Cybertruck overtook it as the best-selling electric truck in America, and new electric trucks are hitting the market from legacy automakers that offer better range and newer tech.

Ford has backtracked a bit on its EV plans but said it still feels confident its approach is the best among its rivals. Earlier this year, the Blue Oval announced that it would slow EV output to focus on hybrids and plug-in hybrids, which delayed its next planned electric truck model indefinitely.

[Images: Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Ford #FordModelE #FordF150lightning

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 40 comments

Bd2 on Nov 01, 2024
Farley needs to meet the fate of those youtube influencers.

1 Reply
Varezhka on Nov 01, 2024
From CAFE standpoint Ford is probably better off upping their production of F-150 and Explorer hybrids. But they do still need to meet that CARB ZEV requirement. I’m guessing they’ve met the goal for the year so no need for more money losing toys till the next MY?

1 Reply

Recent Comments

Lou_BC I've had my collision alert come on 2 times in 8 months. Once was when a pickup turned onto a side road with minimal notice. Another with a bus turning left and I was well clear in the outside lane but turn off was in a corner. I suspect the collision alert thought I was traveling in a straight line.I have the "emergency braking" part of the system turned off. I've had "lane keep assist" not recognize vehicles parked on the shoulder.That's the extent of my experience with "assists". I don't trust any of it.
SCE to AUX A lot has changed since I got my license in 1979, about 2 weeks after I turned 16 (on my second attempt). I would have benefited from formal driver training, and waiting another year to get my license. I was a road terror for several years - lots of accidents, near misses, speeding, showing off - the epitome of youthful indiscretion.
Lou_BC Jellybean F150 (1997-2004). People tend to prefer the more square body and blunt grill style.
SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.