Google's Waymo Accuses Uber of Stealing Its Autonomous Secrets
Waymo is suing over claims that a former employee stole the design for one of its LIDAR systems and brought it to a competitor. The alleged theft of Waymo’s intellectual property came to light after the company was accidentally privy to an email chain that described an Uber design for a LIDAR circuit board that looked very familiar.
So familiar, in fact, that the Google-backed Waymo filed a lawsuit on Thursday in a California federal court. The suit accuses former Google employee Anthony Levandowski of stealing its tech for the LIDAR sensor used by the Otto autonomous startup company. Unfortunately for Waymo, Uber paid $680 million for Otto last August and is currently using the potentially stolen designs.
According to a blog post written by the Waymo team, Levandowski downloaded over 14,000 confidential and proprietary designs for its current software six weeks before leaving Google. Those files included designs for the LIDAR and circuit board.
“Mr. Levandowski searched for and installed specialized software onto his company-issued laptop. Once inside, he downloaded 9.7 GB of Waymo’s highly confidential files and trade secrets, including blueprints, design files and testing documentation. Then he connected an external drive to the laptop. Mr. Levandowski then wiped and reformatted the laptop in an attempt to erase forensic fingerprints,” claims the Waymo posting. “Months before the mass download of files, Mr. Levandowski told colleagues that he had plans to ‘replicate’ Waymo’s technology at a competitor.”
The company also says it thinks other former employees have left its ranks to join Otto and Uber’s self-driving efforts, bringing valuable trade secrets with them. Waymo says it’s all part of one big collaborative plan to steal its intellectual property.
The court filling includes patent infringement, unlawful misappropriation of industrial secrets, and unfair business practices. Waymo wants an injunction to end the use of what it believes are its own designs, and is demanding a trial over the matter.
[Image: Waymo]
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 1995 SC I am going to reserve judgement until we see if we get some different versions. The prelude was always a bit of a technological showcase back in the day so the drivetrain makes some sense. Hopefully we get some different versions. A high revving NA motor would be my preferred choice, but seems unlikely. But I'm not going to knock anyone bringing a coupe to market in 2025 if I can help it.
- JMII As an ex '89 Prelude Si owner I want nothing to do with this mess. It looks decent but no manual, no turbo = no fun. If you are only giving me two doors you better make up for the lack of interior space with something that is actually engaging to drive. Simulated shifts? $42k price? UGH. Seems Honda didn't learn anything from the CR-Z debacle.
- ToolGuy™ Nice.(What happens if I can't turn it off, asking for a friend.)
- Slavuta And BTW. There is nothing special about this car besides the name. And people who might get some feelings invoked by "Prelude" are already in a different league. Many even died. Or driving either BMW or Soul, depending on income.
- Slavuta "At an estimated $42,000 USD a pop, Honda is likely to sell more than a few Preludes on the basis of nostalgia alone. " -- right now that will get you a nice Z. And Z has MT. I mean, only a fool IMHO will pay 42K for this hybrid. Who said GR86? (0-60 6.1 sec)
Comments
Join the conversation
"Show me the blueprints." "Show me the blueprints." "Show me the blueprints." "Show me the blueprints!"
Once the ambulance chasers take over the shop with all their clueless, self righteous childishness, no wonder the engineers are leaving. Levandowski knew as much about autonomous tech as anyone. His brain wouldn't magically be erased by leaving his Waymo office. If he did bring actual documents, the only role they served were one of convenience. Not having to retype all the stuff, and rerun the experiments, at a new place. The value add of Otto was never a circuit board design for a technology (Lidar) that, with the current fashionableness of all things "self driving," are obsoleted every six months anyway. Instead, the value add was application of knowledge gained in the context of a more general solution to "'se;d driving," to one more specifically aimed at a much simpler subset of the problem(s) Levandowski worked on at Google/Waymo: That of heavy trucks driving on highways. Waymo could have specifically targetted trucks as well, and Levandowski would never have left. But they didn't, so he did, and in the process helped make "self driving" something with a least a sliver of potential to be something more than just hype. Which is more than any lawyer, investor, manager nor other self promoting semi literate neither have, nor ever will, accomplish. Which, of course, won't stop them from doing the only thing they are capable of: Trying to get the power of the state to help them stick their useless, grubby fingers into value chains created and fed by those that are actually trying to do something useful with their lives.