Mazda CEO Explains Strategy While Simultaneously Breaking the Hearts of Rotary Fanboys Everywhere

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Mazda has big aspirations for the future. However, its immediate plans don’t appear to include a successor to the RX-8, despite Mazda’s continued development on its trademark rotary engine and other conflicting information.

Instead, CEO Masamichi Kogai says the company is going to focus on its push upmarket while diversifying powertrains and cementing itself as the sporting choice over its rivals.

Speaking to Automotive News with the help of an interpreter, Mr. Kogai explained his vision of Mazda’s more upscale future.

“We want to distinguish ourselves by being a little elevated above the other Japanese or mainstream brands,” he said.

“If the car itself is not attractive, we can’t command a higher price. So, for the Mazda 3, the Mazda 6 and the CX-3, they will all have major updates. And the CX-5 is undergoing a full model change. In that way, we keep improving the models all the time. Instead of just creating a buzz to come see a new design, we enhance the vehicle’s potential in performance and technology. That is something new we are implementing.”

Part of that implementation pertains to the company’s next generation of Skyactiv drivetrains, which include a diesel option on next year’s CX-5.

While the diesel version of the crossover will be coming to the United States, Kogai suspects most diesel sales will continue taking place in Japan.

“In the U.S., diesel is not necessarily the cheaper option. It’s about 8 percent more expensive than gasoline. But compared with high-octane gasoline, diesel is cheaper. We still have to pinpoint where people can find the advantage in buying diesel,” he explained.

Inevitably, Mazda’s partnership with Toyota will produce an electric powertrain too. The company thinks the safest play is to keep EV production at a low-volume and not abandon combustion engines too quickly. Mazda’s Head of Research and Development Kiyoshi Fujiwara asserts that by 2020, “five to ten percent of the market will be pure EV, while the rest will still use ICE. Therefore ICE is [currently] the most important technology in the world.”

Kogai’s take seems to be that electrification is inevitable and important for Mazda, especially in the form of its own unique hybrid. The company has long been hinting that the rotary engine might make a return — if not in the hypothetical RX-9, as a range extender for some type of EV.

“We ended production of the RX-8 with the rotary engine,” Kogai stated. “But if we were to restart production of the rotary engine again, we need to make sure it wouldn’t be just short-lived. We need it to meet future emissions regulations. We are still conducting our R&D activity to overcome any issues we have with emissions and fuel efficiency.”

When asked if the rotary would see the light of day as a supplemental power source for an EV or as a primary drivetrain first, he said that the zero-emissions vehicle mandate made electrification the clear priority. Kogai didn’t even suggest the rotary as a practical stand-alone option, not even in a possible RX car.

“I think that as a sports car option, the MX-5 1.5-liter or 2.0-liter conventional engine, with its power and acceleration, might be a more exhilarating experience.”

Putting the the final nail into the RX-9’s coffin was his single word response to if there were any plans to introduce a sports car larger than the MX-5.

“No.”

[Image: Mazda]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 51 comments
  • SCE to AUX How well does the rear camera work in the rain and snow?
  • MaintenanceCosts The Truth About Isuzu Troopers!
  • Jalop1991 MC's silence in this thread is absolutely deafening.
  • MaintenanceCosts Spent some time last summer with a slightly older Expedition Max with about 100k miles on the clock, borrowed from a friend for a Colorado mountain trip.It worked pretty well on the trip we used it for. The EcoBoost in this fairly high state of tune has a freight train feeling and just keeps pulling even way up at 12k ft. There is unending space inside; at one point we had six adults, two children, and several people's worth of luggage inside, with room left over. It was comfortable to ride in and well-equipped.But it is huge. My wife refused to drive it because she couldn't get comfortable with the size. I used to be a professional bus driver and it reminded me quite a bit of driving a bus. It was longer than quite a few parking spots. Fortunately, the trip didn't involve anything more urban than Denver suburbs, so the size didn't cause any real problems, but it reminded me that I don't really want such a behemoth as a daily driver.
  • Jalop1991 It seems to me this opens GM to start substituting parts and making changes without telling anyone, AND without breaking any agreements with Allison. Or does no one remember Ignitionswitchgate?At the core of the problem is a part in the vehicle's ignition switch that is 1.6 millimeters less "springy" than it should be. Because this part produces weaker tension, ignition keys in the cars may turn off the engine if shaken just the right way...2001: GM detects the defect during pre-production testing of the Saturn Ion.2003: A service technician closes an inquiry into a stalling Saturn Ion after changing the key ring and noticing the problem was fixed.2004: GM recognizes the defect again as the Chevrolet Cobalt replaces the Cavalier.fast forward through the denials, driver deaths, and government bailouts2012: GM identifies four crashes and four corresponding fatalities (all involving 2004 Saturn Ions) along with six other injuries from four other crashes attributable to the defect.Sept. 4, 2012: GM reports August 2012 sales were up 10 percent from the previous year, with Chevrolet passenger car sales up 25 percent.June 2013: A deposition by a Cobalt program engineer says the company made a "business decision not to fix this problem," raising questions of whether GM consciously decided to launch the Cobalt despite knowing of a defect.Dec. 9, 2013: Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew announces the government had sold the last of what was previously a 60 percent stake in GM, ending the bailout. The bailout had cost taxpayers $10 billion on a $49.5 billion investment.End of 2013: GM determines that the faulty ignition switch is to blame for at least 31 crashes and 13 deaths.It took over 10 years for GM to admit fault.And all because an engineer decided to trim a pin by tenths of a millimeter, without testing and without getting anyone else's approval.Fast forward to 2026, and the Allison name is no longer affiliated with the transmissions. You do the math.
Next