QOTD: Something About My Benzo?
Up on Housing Project Hill
So let’s say you’re idly thumbing through the CarMax listings looking for CLS63 AMGs in a copper color. (Guilty as charged: they have one, and it’s more than I should spend, so I’m not going to add a garagemate for the 911 and Boxster any time soon.) Well, the CLS63 in the current body style is still expensive. Let’s drop down a bit to $59,998. What can we get for this money? Why, only the very worst and the very best Benzo you can buy in this country most of the time, in AMG trim.
No matter how many journalists return from the south of Spain singing the praises of the CLA45, we here at TTAC will likely remain unconvinced of the virtues of this over-pressurized Volkswagen Jetta-alike. As far as we can tell, the only real difference between this and a Stage ZZXX99-Something Mitsubishi Evo is that you can’t have the CLA with a stick-shift or a full helping of fast-and-furious street cred.
The CL63, on the other hand… well, sir, this is a proper motorcar. Ignore the fact that its predecessor, the strangely graceful and well-assembled C215 CL55, was the vehicle of choice for various disreputable idiots ranging from Cannonball-catheter crackpot Ed Bolian to, um, myself. Since the days of the 380SEC, the S-Class coupe has always struck just the right balance between conspicuous consumption and outrageous ostentation. There’s never been a reason to get one, which is why it’s so wonderful. Buying the coupe instead of the sedan costs you more up front, gets you less at trade-in, and frankly marks you as a bit of an odd bird. It’s a pure style move, and the CL63 makes it perfectly, from the wide, featureless grille up front that only the cognoscenti immediately recognize as the big coupe to the surprisingly subtle dropped tail and bland-but-tasteful lamps. In the middle, of course, you get the real reason any romantic buys the big Benz: it’s a pillarless coupe, known as a “hardtop” to most folks. The preferred coupe configuration in the pre-Colonnade era.
This car could ring the cash register for over $150K just four years ago, but now it’s yours for just over a third of that. Why would you even think of buying the CLA instead? Well, there’s the tiny matter of maintenance and repair. The old 380SEC was famous for durability: this 600,000-mile example isn’t even the most well-traveled 380SEC in the United States. The modern cars don’t have quite the same moxie, or so we’re told.
Which would you pick, dear reader? The car-of-the-moment CLA45, all FWD-based and humpback-whale-shaped? Or the elegant but potentially troublesome CL63? I’d go with the coupe, no questions asked. Except one, maybe: “The extended warranty is as good as they say, right?”
More by Jack Baruth
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- ToolGuy™ I have always resented how GM did not consult me on styling choices.
- ToolGuy™ Ford produces 6,819 vehicles in about 17 minutes.
- ToolGuy™ Yes, but No. And Maybe. With upscale soft-touch interior materials, especially below the armrest.(I am training to be an Automotive Journalist.)
- Orange260z In 2007 we drove from Regina SK to LA via Flagstaff, and Las Vegas, returning via Sam Francisco, Reno and Northern NV. The Montana "reasonable and prudent" had been repealed by then, and Montana actually had the slowest highway speeds of our trip.Through Utah, Arizona, and Nevada we were quite surprised to see a steady flow of traffic at speeds of approximately 100mph on I15, I40, and I80, but also Hwy89, Hwy93 and other non-interstate highways. Many of the vehicles doing these speeds were full-size SUVs and pickup trucks - having owned Suburbans and Yukons I get that they are comfortable cruisers at high speed, but good luck braking or swerving at 100mph.Also had a similar experience driving back to Ontario from Dallas TX - much of the daytime interstate traffic was moving in the 85-100mph range (speed limits were generally 70--75mph).
- Normie What IS this website doing that results in now-you-see-me-now-you-don't comments? And not just mine.
Comments
Join the conversation
My answer is neither. If I was in the market for a Benz, I'd get a W111, not a German Camaro.
To the point that some people are making about "old vs. new", I'd say sometimes the old product is genuinely superior to the new product, at least in ways that matter to the purchaser. Although I'm not in the market for cars like a Mercedes, the last car they made that impressed me was the W126. While not exciting or cutting edge, it seemed solid as a rock and absolutely unflappable. I have no idea if they are ultimately utter piles of junk or if they are truly amazing cars as they seemed to be when new. To make the "old vs. new" argument more personal, I own a 2006 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon Unlimited. To me it is a better vehicle than the current 2007+ Jeeps that replaced it. I prefer the smooth power delivery of the inline-6 and I like the tidier dimensions (especially width) of the older model. Finally, I like the more "classic" styling of the older model - I can see the clear lineage of the old CJ-5 and CJ-7 in my vehicle. The 2007+ vehicles got a more radical body change and that lineage is lost to me - it's just too different. Considering that TJ Wranglers hold their value exceedingly well, other people must feel the same way I do.