Nissan Leaf Range Upgrade Remains a Mystery of Our Time

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A week after the unveiling of the second-generation 2018 Nissan Leaf, we know for sure that value, value, value! is the upgraded model’s strongest selling point.

No longer offering a paltry 107 miles of range, the new Leaf sports a just-good-enough 150 miles of driving distance, or so Nissan believes. Of course, knowing that Chevrolet’s Bolt and Tesla’s Model 3 offer significantly better range, the Leaf’s priced to sell. For $29,990 plus delivery, and minus a $7,500 tax credit, Nissan figures the base S model is enough to tempt cost-conscious EV buyers who don’t want it all.

But there’s a longer-ranged Leaf in the works. For 2019, buyers can opt for a stepped-up 60 kWh battery, but just how far a so-equipped Leaf can drive on a single charge differs depending on the Nissan exec doing the talking.

Speaking at the second-gen Leaf’s Tokyo unveiling, Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa promised a range of more than 300 miles, Automotive News reports.

Holy cow, the casual listener might think. The top-drawer Leaf can lap the Bolt and Model 3! Tap the brakes (or lift off the e-Pedal), son. Japan’s testing cycle assigns vastly superior ranges to electric vehicles, meaning that figure stands to receive quite a haircut on the EPA cycle. A Nissan spokesperson later told Automotive News that U.S. Leafs won’t reach 300 miles, though hypermilers might hit that distance before going dark.

The last word on the issue comes from Daniele Schillaci, Nissan’s executive vice president of sales and marketing. Schillaci told the trade journal that a 2019 Leaf with 60 kWh battery will exceed 225 miles on the EPA cycle, but wouldn’t pin down an exact estimate. Even if the 225 figure stands, that’s better than a base Model 3’s 220 miles. However, the Bolt’s 238-mile range seems like a tantalizing figure to beat, assuming Nissan engineers have the ability.

Still, range isn’t everything with the Leaf. For its upcoming marketing campaign, Nissan is reportedly planning to drop the tired “save the planet”/”this uses no gas” template and focus instead on value-for-money. Apparently, buyers know what an electric car is. Besides the one-pedal driving experience offered by the brand’s e-Pedal, the 2018 Leaf arrives with Nissan’s ProPilot semi-autonomous driving technology — both highly marketable bits of kit.

The 2018 Leaf goes on sale in a (very) truck- and SUV-hungry America in early 2018.

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 32 comments
  • JohnTaurus JohnTaurus on Sep 11, 2017

    "....we know for sure that value, value, value! is the upgraded model’s strongest selling point." Because that worked out SO WELL for Honda and their second gen Insight. No, not a dedicated electric, but still a "green" model. It seems to me that buyers in the market for these types of cars are not as willing to put up with less performance (as in range or MPG) in exchange for a lower entry price point. This does not bode well for Nissan's strategy. I think they'd be better off with a more competitive model, in terms of range, than just going with the "but its cheaper!" proposition. With selling off its battery-producing assets, and this half-ass redux of the Leaf, I think Nissan is trying to quietly and slowly step away from the ultra-competitive BEV market.

    • See 3 previous
    • PandaBear PandaBear on Sep 11, 2017

      I can't speak for other market but at least in California, the major incentive to EV is the HOV lane, and office charging for free. It would take at least a round trip range to be safe in case you cannot charge at work (i.e. overcrowded parking or limited charging hours like 3 hr per person per day). People will pay a premium for EV to avoid traffic in long commute, and today's EV range is borderline useful for a lot of commutes. A few grand extra is not a big deal and if you cannot do a round trip back all electric. That's why you see a premium for plug in hybrid over an early model low range leaf when they are both 3-5 years old.

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Sep 11, 2017

    225 miles is the likely answer for the 60 kWh Leaf. What's amazing is Nissan's lackluster production schedule for this car, given their long experience and the fact that it's not even all-new. However, after Leaf 1.0, I no longer trust Nissan's range claims, and I certainly would doubt the resale value of an EV with an air-cooled battery. Depreciation on Leafs is akin to Fiat 500s - abysmal. People opting for the Bolt or Model 3 will get a lot more value and lower total cost of ownership, IMO.

  • Jalop1991 You do realize, you can get a $1 lease payment on any vehicle from any manufacturer, for any term.Just make a big enough "down payment". But hey, at least you have bragging rights, right?I keep seeing this insanity being marketed. "Polestar, only $399 month!" (with a huge "down payment"). Are people really this stupid?$7500 to enter into a lease just so you can say "but the payment is only $559!"??? Good God. And when some car full of Kia Boyz slams into you and totals it as you drive it off the lot, what then? The dealership will laugh at you as they count your $7500 and you stand there on the street looking like a fool.Why do people who lease, put any money down on a depreciating and very easily totalled asset like a car?
  • EngineerfromBaja_1990 A friend from college had its twin (2003 Cavalier 2dr) which fittingly re-named the Cacalier. No description needed
  • Lorenzo GM is getting out of the car biz, selling only trucks, EVs and the Corvette. They're chasing the bigger margins on lower volume, like the dealer trying to sell a car for $1 million: "I just have to sell one!"
  • SCE to AUX "The closeness of the two sides"56-44 isn't close, if that's what you mean.
  • Jalop1991 expensive repairs??? I've heard that EVs don't require anything that resembles maintenance or repair!So let me get this straight: as EV design and manufacture technology, and as battery technology, improves over time, the early adopters will suffer from having older and ever-rapidly outdated cars that as a result have lower resale value than they thought.And it's the world's obligation to brush their tears away and give them money back as they realize the horrible mistake they made, the mistake made out of some strong desire to signal their virtue, the mistake they could have avoided by--you know--calmly considering the facts up front?Really? It's Tesla's obligation here?If Tesla continued to manufacture the Model 3 (for example) the same way it did originally when the Model 3 was introduced, Tesla would not have been able to lower prices. And they wouldn't have. But they invested heavily in engineering in order to bring prices down--and now the snowflakes are crying in their cereal that the world didn't accommodate their unicorn dreams and wishes and wants and desires.Curse the real world! How dare it interfere with those unicorn wishes!
Next