Junkyard Find: 1971 Toyota Land Cruiser

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Every time I share photos of an old Toyota Land Cruiser I spotted in a junkyard, the anguished wails from readers commence. Nobody ever asks me where to find those doomed trucks so they can buy parts before The Crusher eats them, and only a few of the anguished wails come from Land Cruiser aficionados troubled by the demise of another old FJ. No, what upsets so many is the offense against reality on display, the demise of a truck worth 25 grand— no, 50 grand!— in any county, parish, or prefecture on the planet. Well, all I can say is that real-world values of vehicles often differ from what we think they should be, and today’s Junkyard Find proves this (again).

Yes, what we have here is a genuine, numbers-matching, early-production FJ55 Land Cruiser, among the Legacies and Jettas of the imports section of a big self-serve yard about halfway between Denver and Cheyenne. I’ve found some interesting machinery in this place, including a Vauxhall Victor, a ’60 Chevy Brookwood two-door wagon, and one of the first Audis ever sold in the United States.

Before a vehicle reaches the public inventory of a U-Wrench yard, plenty of knowledgeable professionals get the opportunity to buy it. When that vehicle is something like a post-C4 Corvette or Jaguar E-Type, it gets rescued. When it’s a rusty FJ55 … well, here it is.

Toyota was still license-building a lot of GM hardware in the early 1970s, including this 3.9-liter straight-six pushrod engine derived from the Chevrolet “Stovebolt” that powered so many cars and trucks from the 1920s through the 1960s. By 1971, the Toyota and GM designs had diverged enough that few parts would interchange, but Toyota was still paying licensing fees to The General. The two-speed Toyoglide transmission (based on the GM Powerglide) was still going into some Toyotas at this point, too.

No FJ55s got Toyoglides at the factory, however, or any automatic transmission. This one has a good old three-on-the-tree column-shift manual, the same kind of rig that went into millions of Stovebolt-powered Chevrolets of the 1940s and 1950s. American truck shoppers could get a new three-on-the-tree from GM all the way through 1987, but the Land Cruiser went to all floor-shift manuals much earlier than that.

The column-mounted shifter is what you need if you want to squeeze three people into the front bench seat without banging the middle passenger’s knees with every shift.

The Land Cruiser has always been more about sturdiness than luxury, which is why it’s finally getting the axe in North America. Few of us felt willing to pay six figures for a Warlord Grade truck with less snazz and a rougher ride than any number of cheaper luxury SUVs, regardless of the near-Century-grade build quality. However, even the early Land Cruiser wagons got some comfort upgrades, such as this heater beneath the front seats. Yes, that’s a bare heater core with exposed hoses and a crude steel box containing a fan; functional and easy to maintain, but better-suited for the mountains of Waziristan than the valet parking of Aspen.

The interior is done up in materials chosen more for longevity than cushiness, and the fact that this stuff still looks pretty good at age 50 tells us that Toyota chose well.

Has the world gone crazy, or is a well-worn early FJ55 not worth the investment of a few tens of thousands of bucks in restoration costs? These trucks sell for plenty in nice shape, as we all know.

Cruises at 85 miles per hour all day long, and you travel in seven-man, foam-seat comfort!

For links to 2,000+ additional Junkyard Finds, be sure to visit the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 26 comments
  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Feb 01, 2021

    Is that the handle for a manual choke on the instrument panel? As for longevity/durability, certainly manufacturer's should be rewarded for producing vehicles that can run reliably, with only regular maintenance for a decade. After that reasonable repairs for another 5+ years. Without having to go to extremes to get access. What would it cost to put better insulation on wires, sturdier connections (as per Murilee's Lexus), higher quality bolts/fasteners and metal rather than plastic parts? Perhaps as much as $500 per vehicle? Possibly about the same as dealers charge for all weather floor mats?

    • See 1 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Feb 01, 2021

      @Arthur Dailey, $500 in Material cost would go a long long long way in covering higher spec wiring, fasteners and parts. (Not adding parts, just upgrading to nicer parts.) Many people would be surprised how low the actual cost of Material is going into a typical vehicle (and it is all cost-specced within an inch of its life). Offering a double-DIN easily-replaceable radio on a newly-engineered model would have *no* piece cost associated with it. (The OEM's moved away from this because of planned obsolescence and that is the only reason.) [Picture a fighter jet where you open the access door and slide in the new module for avionics, etc.] @PeriSoft, "you can’t do that for the least expensive models" Some of the least expensive lower-trim models are barely profitable (or worse) for the OEM's, which means they really don't have any business making or selling them [see "some Ford cars"]. (Some OEM's are willfully blind to this fact until the overall profit results bite them in the butt.) @Everyone, Once a model has been in production for several years the failure points become apparent. Most OEM's don't address these; they move on to an entirely new design with all-new problems. Corporate ADHD. (Oooooh shiny!)

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Feb 02, 2021

    This might not be worth restoring but there are enough parts on it to make it a good donor vehicle for restoring another Land Cruiser. Contrary to some I would rather have an overbuilt vehicle like this than a vehicle that starts falling apart the day after you drive it off the lot. I don't think some of you will have to worry about most of today's new vehicles being overbuilt especially those with CVTs and water pumps enclosed inside the engine with timing chains and belts. Plastic door handles, plastic trim, paper thin carpet, and mismatched trim on many new vehicles assure that most new vehicles will not last. Lasting 10 years should be the minimum standard for new vehicles especially when the average price that new vehicles sell for is 40k. With the complexity of today's vehicles especially ICE vehicles you might be better off with an EV with less components to fail. I have more concern about spending 40k for a new vehicle that falls apart in a few years than a small appliance. My expectations for something I pay 40k are much higher than something I pay $100 or less. Maybe that is just me but I worked too hard for my money to waste it on a poorly made vehicle.

  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
  • Willie If both nations were actually free market economies I would be totally opposed. The US is closer to being one, but China does a lot to prop up the sectors they want to dominate allowing them to sell WAY below cost, functionally dumping their goods in our market to destroy competition. I have seen this in my area recently with shrimp farmed by Chinese comglomerates being sold super cheap to push local producers (who have to live at US prices and obey US laws) out of business.China also has VERY lax safety and environmental laws which reduce costs greatly. It isn't an equal playing field, they don't play fair.
  • Willie ~300,000 Camrys and ~200,000 Accords say there is still a market. My wife has a Camry and we have no desire for a payment on something that has worse fuel economy.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh NOBODY BUYS THEM SO NO
Next