Buy/Drive/Burn: Oddball Semi-premium SUVs From 1998

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

The Buy/Drive/Burn series has been stuck in a time warp lately. After tackling domestic minivans from 1994 with luxury appointments, we moved on to 1997 and some nontraditional imported minivans.

Once again, we’re going to keep it in the ’90s and determine which of three imported, alternative semi-luxury SUVs should burn at the stake. Are you ready for gold badges and two-tone? Rhetorical question.

Acura SLX

The imported minivans article linked above discussed the Honda Odyssey, which was also sold as the Isuzu Oasis in its first generation. Here we have an Isuzu sold by the luxury arm of Honda. The SLX was on offer at Acura dealers between 1996 and 1999. The 1998 model year saw a visual refresh with larger grille and headlamps, and a change from 3.2 to 3.5 liters for the Isuzu V6 engine. All SLX models were loaded, and featured ruched leather on all five seats, wood, and a huge sunroof. The SLX was a stop-gap measure at a time when Honda wasn’t too keen on SUVs (remember the Passport?). There was no SLX replacement from Acura until 2001, when the MDX was finally readied for sale. Buyers should look out for that GM 4L30-E transmission, though — it doesn’t like motivating the heft of the SLX.

Land Rover Discovery I

The Land Rover is perhaps the most prestigious of our oddball luxury collection. It’s the reason 1998 is our selected year, because 1999 would see the dawn of the Discovery II. All three of our rides today were roughly at the end of their lives in 1998. Like above, Honda also rebadged a Discovery and called it the Crossroad for the Japanese market. On sale in the US since the 1994 model year, the Discovery gained luxury appointments throughout its development. All 1996 to 1998 Discovery models had the 4.0-liter Rover V8 under the hood. For our purposes, today’s Discovery is the top trim LSE. It features five regular leather-clad seats, and two jump seats in the back for people you dislike. Buyers should keep an eye on those Lucas electrics.

Mitsubishi Montero

The second generation Montero arrived in North America for the 1994 model year, replacing the very boxy and much less refined first-generation model. For 1998 the Montero got a slight visual update (revised cladding) and a simplification in trims (one model). Standard features include seven real seats and a split third row which folded up and to the side. Ours will be fully-loaded, with wood trim, leather seats, and an even larger sunroof than the SLX. The Montero has the added benefit of having a better ride quality than most vehicles in its class. All 1998 Monteros were powered by the 3.5-liter V6, making 200 horsepower. Honda did not rebadge the Montero, and buyers might watch out for oil leaks in various places under the hood.

Which of these two semi-forgotten import SUVs do you take home or borrow, and which one magically bursts into flames?

[Images: Acura, Land Rover, Mitsubishi]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 68 comments
  • 2000ChevyImpalaLS 2000ChevyImpalaLS on Mar 10, 2018

    Another round of congrats on the Ford, John. I know that has to be special to you. To answer the question, I'd buy the Montero. My previous employer had one that we all kind of used as a runabout. I'm not a Mitsubishi fan, but the one we had was dead-solid reliable and fairly comfortable to drive. Borrow the Discovery. I've never driven one, but I've heard bad things about their reliability. But it'd be interesting to try one for a while. Burn the Isuzu in an Acura costume. I've never liked the Trooper.

  • Asterix Asterix on Mar 11, 2018

    Owned the 1998 Disco so will still "take home" again. Wouldn't mind "borrowing" the Montero. The Acura (Trooper) can burn.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next