Ford Trademarks ‘Lightstream’ Name, Could Portend Performance Truck

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Eagle-eyed fans of the Blue Oval brand have spied a new trademark filing, one which could hold promise for a future performance – street or off-road – variant of the Lightning pickup truck.


Showing up in government docs as the Lightstream, the word certainly doesn’t mean much in a vacuum. And, as we all know, car companies tend to trademark both names and product ideas all the time – few of which ever see the light of day. Sometimes this is to guard and protect an idea or innovation while other times it is to misdirect its competition (and media, it must be said).


Nevertheless, it’s an open secret that Ford would like to introduce different variants of the Lightning, including high performance model (as if 775 lb-ft of torque in a pickup isn’t enough) and an off-road beast. The latter, with knobby tires and lifted ride height, would surely play hell with official range estimates but the specter of a well-balanced Lightning tearing across desert dunes or doing all-wheel drive burnouts on a dry lakebed are too good not to mention.


It is this writer’s opinion that the Raptor designation would be a natural fit for such shenanigans, especially given all of the positive equity built up in that sub-brand. With the name spreading from the F-150 to the Bronco and now to its Ranger cousin, introducing it on the Lightning would be a logical step. And it’s not like Ford is afraid to court controversy with naming conventions – look at the ire they raised with the Mustang Mach-E. They're also not above making dad jokes, as proven by recently introducing the Lightning Flash.


The application for Lightstream was made in late November, suggesting at least someone at the Glass House has this thing at part of what is surely a too-long PowerPoint presentation. As for the filing itself, it unhelpfully describes the terms usage as relating to “Motor vehicles, namely, passenger automobiles, four-wheeled motor vehicles, sport utility vehicles, off-road vehicles, electrically powered motor vehicles, structural parts and fittings therefor.”


Again, that’s boilerplate stuff to throw us all off the scent of what they’re actually planning.


We’ll keep our ears to the ground and an eye on the forums for more details.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 23 comments
  • Mike-NB2 Mike-NB2 on Dec 06, 2023

    See? This is what I have been saying all along. This is what Ford needs. They need more trucks! There is room between the Maverick and the Ranger for at least two new platforms, and probably three between the Ranger and the F-150. And what about a truck between the F-150 and the Super Duty? Surely there is room for one more? And trims? Yes!! Hundreds of trims! Ford needs to be more creative with trims. Remember the Levis trimmed Jeeps from way back? Well Ford, how about a "Kirkland Jeans" trim? Cool! Put a price of $80,000 on it and you'll sell every one you can build. Ford, you can have that idea for free. It's just one of many I have. Contact me for more.


    What people are clamoring for are more trucks in the $60,000 to $100,000 range. Dealers can't get enough of them!

    • See 1 previous
    • Mike-NB2 Mike-NB2 on Dec 07, 2023

      SCE - I don't dispute that. If people assess their 'needs' and come up with a truck so be it.


  • El scotto El scotto on Dec 07, 2023

    A Ford Maverick Lightsabre! May the G-Force be with you! No Jedi mind tricks, just instant torque. These aren't the ICEs you're looking for.

  • Jkross22 I'd imagine there's a booming business available for EV station repair.
  • JLGOLDEN Enormous competition is working against any brand in the fight for "luxury" validation. It gets murky for Cadillac's image when Chevy, Buick, and GMC models keep moving up the luxury features (and price) scale. I think Cadillac needs more consistency with square, crisp designs...even at the expense of aerodynamics and optimized efficiency. Reintroduce names such as DeVille, Seville, El Dorado if you want to create a stir.
  • ClipTheApex I don't understand all of the negativity from folks on this forum regarding Europeans. Having visited the EU multiple times across different countries, I find they are very much like us in North America-- not as different as politicians like to present them. They all aren't liberal "weenies." They are very much like you and me. Unless you've travelled there and engaged with them, it's easy to digest and repeat what we hear. I wish more Americans would travel abroad. When they return, they will have a different view of America. We are not as perfect or special as we like to believe. And no, many Europeans don't look up to America. Quite the opposite, actually.
  • Dwford Let's face it, Cadillac is planning minimal investment in the current ICE products. Their plan is to muddle through until the transition to full EV is complete. The best you are going to get is one more generation of ICE vehicles built on the existing platforms. What should Cadillac do going forward? No more vehicles under $50k. No more compact vehicles. Rely on Buick for that. Many people here mention Genesis. Genesis doesn't sell a small sedan, and they don't sell a small crossover. They sell midsize and above. So should Cadillac.
  • EBFlex Sorry BP. They aren’t any gaps
Next