2019 GMC Sierra Headed for March 1 Debut in Detroit

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

We’ve shown you the spy photos already, but your first glimpse of the real thing is now less than a month away. The wraps come off the next-generation GMC Sierra in Detroit on March 1st, Automotive News has learned, providing us with yet another new truck in a year that, so far, has brought little else.

Both the 2019 Sierra and luxo-barge Sierra Denali will appear in the Motor City next month, complimenting the next-gen Chevrolet Silverado that debuted last month. While the GMC is expected to gain the full complement of powertrain hand-me-downs, its styling will head in a different direction.

Up front, at least. From what we’ve seen of the new model, there’s little difference to be found in a side-on view, leaving the Sierra’s face as the big question mark. It looks like GMC plans an evolution of the design that’s served it well over the past many years, with new headlights, foglights, and a bolder grille to set it apart from its Chevy twin.

Certainly, the camouflaged face we saw last month seems less divisive than the Silverado’s. Time will tell if that’s actually the case.

The same weight-saving measures that shaved about 450 pounds from the Silverado will appear in the Sierra, aiding fuel economy. There’s a handful of tricks in store for that goal. For 2019, GM’s using Delphi’s Dynamic Skip Fire cylinder deactivation system on its 5.3- and 6.2-liter V8 engines, and a 10-speed automatic joins the model line for the first time. Like the Silverado, the Sierra will surely make use of the Flint-built 3.0-liter inline-six diesel announced last month.

We’re still waiting on specs for that intriguing mill, though GM hopes to top the fuel economy of Ford’s just-announced 3.0-liter diesel V6.

With truck sales making up an ever-greater slice of GM’s revenue pie, a redesigned full-size line should help the automaker compete in an age of rapidly declining car sales. In 2017, Sierra sales fell 1.7 percent, nearly the exact opposite of the Silverado’s sales performance.

[Images: Brian Williams/SpiedBilde]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Sub-600 Sub-600 on Feb 02, 2018

    I hope they didn’t take the ugly stick to this one, that black grille may extend all the way down.

  • Brumus Brumus on Feb 02, 2018

    Dear TTAC, Could you please get the complimenting/complementing thing right? With compliments, Harold

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next