Argo AI Shuts Down

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Autonomous vehicle start-up Argo AI is set to shut down.


The company started with a $1 billion investment in 2017. Now, it's on the way out, with Ford and Volkswagen, the company's two main backers, set to absorb it.

Employees were reportedly told that they get a severance package with insurance plus two different bonuses. One bonus would be an annual award and the other would be based on the transaction with Ford and VW. Some employees will get offers to work for Ford or VW, and those that don't will receive termination and severance pay and health insurance. Reports indicate that the package was generous.

Those same reports say that company founders spoke to the company's over 2,000 employees.

Argo put out a statement: “In coordination with our shareholders, the decision has been made that Argo AI will not continue on its mission as a company. Many of the employees will receive an opportunity to continue work on automated driving technology with either Ford or Volkswagen, while employment for others will unfortunately come to an end.”

This news comes shortly after Ford said it would shift resources towards advanced driver-assistance tech and away from autonomous vehicles. A third-quarter $2.7 billion non-cash, pre-tax impairment on Ford's investment in Argo AI led to an $827 million net loss in the quarter.

Ford also apparently struggled to get new investors for Argo AI.

Ford CEO Jim Farley: “But things have changed, and there’s a huge opportunity right now for Ford to give time — the most valuable commodity in modern life — back to millions of customers while they’re in their vehicles. It’s mission-critical for Ford to develop great and differentiated L2+ and L3 applications that at the same time make transportation even safer.”

Farley also said Ford might buy autonomous-vehicle tech down the road: “We’re optimistic about a future for L4 ADAS, but profitable, fully autonomous vehicles at scale are a long way off and we won’t necessarily have to create that technology ourselves.”

A company statement suggested that Ford isn't completely jumping out of the AV game: “Development and customer enthusiasm for benefits of L2+ and L3 ADAS warrant dialing up the company’s near-term aspirations and commitment in those areas.”

Whether that's true or just a bit of reassuring copy in the wake of Argo's end remains to be seen.

Volkswagen, for its part, plans to use its Cariad software and partnerships with Bosch and China's Horizon Robotics to work on AVs.

Ride-share service Lyft had a small stake of 2.5 percent in Argo, and also had plans to launch 1,000 AVs across several markets over the next half-decade. Lyft says its plans remain on track.

“We will continue working with our other partners to advance the safety and commercialization of AV technology. Lyft is the current leader in paid AV rides in North America with over 100,000 rides completed. We’re well positioned to win the AV transition through the combination of our hybrid network, marketplace engine and fleet management capabilities,” the company said in a statement.

Argo wasn't Lyft's only AV partner. It also works with Motional and Waymo.

Argo had raised $2.6 billion, mostly from Ford and Volkswagen, since the initial investment in 2017. The development of autonomous vehicles has been very challenging, but Argo seemed to be working towards advancing the use of the tech. Most recently, Argo AI was working up a system to support the use of autonomous vehicles for commercial deliveries and use as robotaxis.

[Image: Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 5 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Oct 27, 2022

    This was predictable, obvious, and inevitable.


    Ford is using weasel words here. They're going to refine their L2 and L3 stuff because it's technically possible, but they've realized that the liabilities associated with L4 or L5 are too much to bear - even if the tech could work.


    The funny part is, the dudes who started Argo AI made bank when Ford came knocking. They go home rich, Ford gets a write-off, and everyone in between suffers.


    Looks like the AV myth is blowing up very publicly.



    • MachoMansSoftSide MachoMansSoftSide on Oct 28, 2022

      I couldn't agree more. I was part of the hybrid/alternative fuels programs at Ford over 25 years ago. For all my efforts, it felt more like a marketing program rather than an engineering one as Toyota walked away with the hybrid advantage. Seeing these monkeys again not understanding technology and its limitations surprising in no way whatsoever. The entire industry needs fresh eyes/blood.


  • Zipper69 Zipper69 on Oct 27, 2022

    Well, SOMEBODY walked away with a bundle...

  • EngineerfromBaja_1990 A friend from college had its twin (2003 Cavalier 2dr) which fittingly re-named the Cacalier. No description needed
  • Lorenzo GM is getting out of the car biz, selling only trucks, EVs and the Corvette. They're chasing the bigger margins on lower volume, like the dealer trying to sell a car for $1 million: "I just have to sell one!"
  • SCE to AUX "The closeness of the two sides"56-44 isn't close, if that's what you mean.
  • Jalop1991 expensive repairs??? I've heard that EVs don't require anything that resembles maintenance or repair!So let me get this straight: as EV design and manufacture technology, and as battery technology, improves over time, the early adopters will suffer from having older and ever-rapidly outdated cars that as a result have lower resale value than they thought.And it's the world's obligation to brush their tears away and give them money back as they realize the horrible mistake they made, the mistake made out of some strong desire to signal their virtue, the mistake they could have avoided by--you know--calmly considering the facts up front?Really? It's Tesla's obligation here?If Tesla continued to manufacture the Model 3 (for example) the same way it did originally when the Model 3 was introduced, Tesla would not have been able to lower prices. And they wouldn't have. But they invested heavily in engineering in order to bring prices down--and now the snowflakes are crying in their cereal that the world didn't accommodate their unicorn dreams and wishes and wants and desires.Curse the real world! How dare it interfere with those unicorn wishes!
  • Canam23 I live in southwest France and I am always surprised at how many Teslas I see on the road here. Mind you, I live in a town of 50k people, not a big city so it does seem unusual. On the other hand I also see a lot of PT Cruisers here (with diesel engines) so there's that...
Next