Junkyard Find: 1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The branches of the Chrysler K-Car Family Tree are far too numerous to describe here, since so many different K-derived cars and minivans were built from the 1981 through 1995 model years for the North American market. One of the rarest types is the 1985-1989 Dodge Lancer, and I've found an example in a Silicon Valley self-service wrecking yard.

The Lancer was the Dodge-badged version of the Chrysler LeBaron GTS hatchback sedan, priced between the Aries and 600 sedans.

The Lancer name has plenty of Chrysler history. For 1961 and 1962, the Lancer name was used on Dodge-badged twins of the Plymouth Valiant (because the Dart name was being used on big Plymouth Fury siblings at the time).

Mitsubishi began using the Lancer name in 1973, and Lancers with Dodge Colt badges appeared in the United States for the 1977 model year. Prior to that, the Colt had been Galant-based. For the 2002 model year, Mitsubishi Lancers finally arrived on this side of the Pacific.

Though Mitsubishi engines were available in plenty of K-Cars and their relatives, all of the 1985-1989 Dodge Lancers came with Chrysler 2.2- or 2.5-liter straight-four power.

This car is a top-trim-level ES with the optional 2.2-liter turbocharged engine, rated at 146 horsepower and 170 pound-feet.

A lot of 1980s cars had phony hood vents, but this one really does deliver cold air to the engine.

You see?

A five-speed manual was base equipment, but this car has the optional three-speed automatic (of course).

The final odometer reading is impressive, getting close to the 300,000-mile mark.

The MSRP for this fine Sterling Heights machine?

The base price was $10,322, which is about $29,015 in 2023 dollars. The turbocharged engine cost $628 ($1,764 today) while the automatic transmission added $504 ($1,415 now).

The Lancers just can't be kept in the showroom, so strong is their sense of 1980s rebellion.

It is the performance sedan that will thrill you all the way to the redline, hold you to the dotted line, cover you down the line, and impress you with its bottom line.

8.6 percent financing or $500 cash back!

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Nov 07, 2023

    Surprised that the K-car that made it this long was a turbo. The most reliable engine in these was also the least powerful - the NA 2.2. (But the turbo 2.2 was still better than the Mitsu 2.6, an awful engine in every way.)

  • Carlos Munoz Carlos Munoz on Apr 10, 2024

    I'm lookinfor an 1985 Chrisler Lebaron or Lancer For Buy if some one have one For sale here is My mail carl6979@hotmail.com My phone Number : 442 270 6804 i'm from California.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next