Ford, GM Pausing Production in Michigan Over Parts Shortage

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford Motor Co and General Motors will be individually suspending production in Michigan next week due to supply chain constraints. However, it’s difficult not to notice that the chosen facilities are responsible for lower-volume models they could probably afford to idle.

GM is stalling Lansing Grand River Assembly and Stamping, citing a parts shortage it said had nothing to do with the ongoing deficit of semiconductor chips. The company later stated that the Russo-Ukrainian war had not played a factor, abandoning the two most popular excuses for why something isn’t being done in 2022. Meanwhile, Ford has said the chip shortage has everything to do with its temporary closure of Flat Rock Assembly.

“The global semiconductor shortage continues to affect Ford’s North American plants – along with automakers and other industries around the world,” the Blue Oval explained. “Behind the scenes, we have teams working on how to maximize production, with a continued commitment to building every high-demand vehicle for our customers with the quality they expect. All of our North American plants will run the week of April 4, except Flat Rock Assembly Plant.”

Ford’s latest closures will only affect the Mustang, which has become a lot less popular since 2015. North American deliveries currently represent about half of what they would have six years ago, suggesting that the company may have opted to let the Mustang take the hit in lieu of having to suspend truck production yet again. The manufacturer even issued a warning last month that the semiconductor shortage would continue to be an issue for the brand, followed by an announcement that it could lead to a decline in quarterly output.

General Motors suspending activities in Lansing will also have its production hit landing on the chin of some of its least-popular models – including the Cadillac CT4, CT5, and Chevrolet Camaro.

The CT5 sedan has failed to be a hit with Americans thus far, garnering only 14,711 U.S. deliveries in 2020 (it’s first full year on sale) and a paltry 9,446 in 2021. But the Cadillac CT4 is the model that really made me lose faith in the brand (along with the XT4) and has attained even fewer orders than its larger counterpart.

Meanwhile, the Camaro has suffered a fate similar to the Mustang with sales volume declining consistently since 2014. Despite both being solid performance automobiles, tastes have shifted and there’s less room for fun-focused coupes in an era where the wealth gap has broadened and there are fewer members of the middle class willing to purchase what are frequently secondary rides. This may also explain why the more-practical Dodge Challenger has managed to retain its volume better than Ford or Chevy’s pony cars.

Speculative to be sure. But both Ford and GM have recently hinted at plans to rejigger their production efforts to prioritize models with superior margins and reliable sales – basically, vehicles that cost less to produce, move reliably, and can be sold for juicier profits. This is especially important now that pandemic-induced sales conditions have mostly ended and there’s less willingness from the public to be gouged by dealerships devoid of product. As a result, companies have continued deprioritizing sedan and coupe sales in favor of more financially robust crossovers, pickups, and SUVs.

Analysts are expecting elevated vehicle pricing to persist regardless, citing rising material costs, ongoing supply constraints, and various industries’ say-so. However, they’ve also begun discussing manufacturers evolving their priorities in a bid to run lean and dealerships that will want to continue enjoying enhanced profitability per transaction for as long as possible.

Unless these are components unique to the above models that have gone absent, my guess is that GM and Ford are tired of having to press pause on their highly lucrative pickup trucks and needed to choose which products would take the hit. Assembly of the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 went down in Indiana last week due to absent semiconductors. Ford stalled production of the F-Series in Kansas City last February for the same reason. But it was hardly the first time either manufacturer idled truck assembly and probably won’t be the last until supply chains return to normal or manufacturers start building more of their own components.

Both plant closures are scheduled to commence on April 4th. GM said it expects Lansing Grand River to remain down until the 11th, adding that employees will still get paid at least 75 percent of their compensation from unemployment. Ford was less clear on when it expects Flat Rock to be back in action, though it likewise stated that it’ll do everything in its power to make up for product shortfalls – assuming there’s a need.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 75 comments
  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Apr 03, 2022

    It's late, and I only have the energy to skim the comments. Same group of monkeys flinging poo at each other. Yawn.

  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Apr 04, 2022

    Tim Healey are you still doing your job? Have you seen what is passing for comment on this site? It it pretty much accepted that a Russian troll farmer was posting here regularly prior to the invasion of Ukraine. And many of the alt-right/anti-vax/conspiracy theorists consistently endorsed and agreed with the disinformation being posted by an agent of a non-friendly nation. Now we see someone trying to drag this site down to the lowest common denominator. Flinging insults the same way that a monkey might throw their own feces.

    • See 1 previous
    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Apr 04, 2022

      Or is it more that you are used to flinging the poo and don't like it when some hits you.

  • Mason Had this identical car as a 17 year old in the late 90's. What a ball of fun, one of many I wish I still had.
  • FinnEss At my age, sedans are difficult to get into without much neck and hip adjustment.I apologize sincerely but that is just the way it is. A truck is my ride of choice.Pronto
  • Ajla The market for sedans is weaker than it once was but I think some of you are way overstating the situation and I disagree that the sales numbers show sedans are some niche thing that full line manufacturers should ignore. There are still a sizeable amount of sales. This isn't sports car volume. So far this year the Camry and Civic are selling in the top 10, with the Corolla in 11 and the Accord, Sentra, and Model 3 in the top 20. And sedan volume is off it's nadir from a few years ago with many showing decent growth over the last two years, growth that is outpacing utilities. Cancelling all sedans now seems more of an error than back when Ford did it.
  • Duties The U.S . would have enough energy to satisfy our needs and export energy if JoeBama hadn’t singlehandedly shut down U.S. energy exploration and production. Furthermore, at current rates of consumption, the U.S. has over two centuries of crude oil, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/exclusive-current-rates-consumption-us-has-more-two-centuries-oil-report.Imagine we lived in a world where all cars were EV's. And then along comes a new invention: the Internal Combustion Engine.Think how well they would sell. A vehicle HALF the weight, HALF the price that would cause only a quarter of the damage to the road. A vehicle that could be refueled in 1/10th the time, with a range of 4 times the distance in all weather conditions. One that does not rely on the environmentally damaging use of non-renewable rare earth elements to power it, and uses far less steel and other materials. A vehicle that could carry and tow far heavier loads. And is less likely to explode in your garage in the middle of the night and burn down your house with you in it. And ran on an energy source that is readily extracted with hundreds of years known supply.Just think how excited people would be for such technology. It would sell like hot cakes, with no tax credits! Whaddaya think? I'd buy one.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic I just road in a rental Malibu this past week. Interior was a bit plasticity, but, well built.Only issue was how “low” the seat was in relation to the ground. I had to crawl “down” into the seat. Also, windscreen was at 65 degree angle which invited multiple reflections. Just to hack off the EPA, how about a boxy design like Hyundai is doing with some of its SUVs. 🚙 Raise the seat one or two inches and raise the roof line accordingly. Would be a hit with the Uber and Lyft crowd as well as some taxi service.🚗 🚗🚗
Next