New Land Rover Discovery Is Ugly - Why? Land Rover Design Boss Blames License Plate Thickness

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The new 2018 Land Rover Discovery (née LR4) is not the automatically handsome successor to the Discovery 4 you assumed it would be.

The front end is visually softened. Viewed from the side, there’s enough bodywork between the windowline and wheelwell to empty the paint shop. The need to maintain a traditional Discovery shape was compromised in part by aero demands, and the result is flat rather than boxy. The C-pillar leaning far forward is more reminiscent of a Lexus RX than a Discovery Series I.

But it’s around the back where Land Rover’s own design boss, Gerry McGovern, has his own problem. “Overall, I like the design of the back of the Discovery for its asymmetry,” McGovern tells Auto Express, “because it’s tipping its hat to the Discoveries of the past.”

The problem then, Mr. McGovern? License plates. Yes. License plates.

As always, apply your standard style-is-subjective qualifier. But then search “new Discovery ugly” on Twitter and be astounded at the wide array of results, of which we’ve only selected a tiny fraction.

The Diagnosis

Sorry LR but your new interpretation of the discovery is plain ugly. It looks as if all the airbags went off at once and puffed up! Shame

— Snakey (@oilandtoil) August 22, 2017

The Critique

Not sure who designed or OK’ed the design of the rear of the new @LandRover Discovery but the words pig ugly spring to mind. 😮

— Martin Baldwin (@marti_b) April 5, 2017

The Angle

Nope not for me, the back is ugly on the new discovery 😝 pic.twitter.com/AB2mUY9faH

— Aidan Chiselle (@AidanChiselle) May 2, 2017

The Comparison

Oh dear. The New Discovery is ugly. What a shame – reminds me of the Ssangyong Rodius 😬 What’s with the back window? pic.twitter.com/4lToxGQCoM

— Will O’Hara (@willohara) February 11, 2017

The Joined-Twitter-Just-For-This

@LandRover_UK Sorry, but that new LandRover Discovery is one seriously ugly vehicle, particularly at the rear. Very disappointed…..

— Mark (@sasnalinkai) September 28, 2016

The Verdict

Just drove past the new @LandRover Discovery. It’s so ugly, someone needs firing.

— Christian (@christiandavvy) June 20, 2017

Land Rover’s design chief, however, believes too many UK dealers are slapping on taller-than-ideal number plates. McGovern feels the Discovery’s new rear end was designed for slimmer license plates. Of course, that theory flies out the window on this side of the Atlantic, where all new Discoverys will wear taller plates. McGovern doesn’t believe the Discovery is in need of a design rethink. “I don’t want to change that asymmetry,” he says.

“But we do need to do something about the number plates.”

Given Land Rover’s recent global success, it’s easy to believe the brand could design very nearly anything and still sell it so long as the vehicle wears the green and white oval. But Land Rover’s clearly not under that impression, otherwise McGovern wouldn’t feel the need to so vehemently defend the new Discovery.

Earlier this year, for instance, McGovern was asked about criticism of the new Discovery. “I’m a professional designer and they’re not,” McGovern said of the critics. “I think it hangs together really well,” he told Motoring. Indeed, McGovern continued by criticising the previous model, saying it featured “a design that didn’t resonate with a lot of people. It was very polarising.”

Regardless, McGovern feels now that proper license plates will cure all ills. Twitterer Mark Smyth? He has a different view.

In related news, the DVLA set to release a statement saying the rear design of new Discovery makes their number plates look ugly. https://t.co/fo5RUky1k8

— Mark Smyth (@Motorscribe) September 19, 2017

[Images: Land Rover]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Tstag Tstag on Sep 20, 2017

    I'm not mad on the tail gate but the rest of it looks good. Also it's a practical car first which is something that appeals more to me tha. The style

  • White Shadow White Shadow on Sep 21, 2017

    Thickness? Did you mean height? All the difference in the world...

  • Varezhka Dunno, I have a feeling the automakers will just have the cars do that without asking and collect that money for themselves. Just include a small print in your purchasing contract.I mean, if Elon Musk thinks he can just use all the Teslas out there for his grid computing projects for free, I wouldn't be too surprised if he's already doing this.
  • Varezhka Any plans yet for Stellantis to wind down some of their dozen plus brands? I mean, most of their European brands (except Fiat and Maserati) are not only 80~90% European sales but also becoming old GM level badge jobs of each other. Lots of almost identical cars fighting within the same small continent. Shouldn't they at least go the Opel/Vauxhall route of one country, one brand to avoid cannibalization? The American brands, at least, have already consolidated with Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep/RAM essentially operating like a single brand. An Auto Union of a sort.
  • Namesakeone I read somewhere that Mazda, before the Volkswagen diesel scandal and despite presumably tearing apart and examining several Golfs and Jettas, couldn't figure out how VW did it and decided then not to offer a diesel. Later, when Dieselgate surfaced, it was hinted that Mazda did discover what Volkswagen was doing and kept quiet about it. Maybe Mazda realizes that they don't have the resources of Toyota and cannot do it as well, so they will concentrate on what they do well. Maybe Mazda will decide that they can do well with the RWD midsized sedan with the inline six they were considering a few years ago
  • IH_Fever A little math: An average, not super high end EV (like a model 3) has 70 kwh of storage assuming perfect fully charged conditions. An average 2-3 person home uses roughly 30 kwh per day. So in theory you have a little over 2 days of juice. Real world, less than that. This could be great if your normal outage is short and you're already spending $50k on a car. I'll stick with my $500 generator and $200 in gas that just got me through a week of no power. A/c, fridge, tv, lights, we were living large. :)
  • EBFlex No. The major apprehension to buying EVs is already well known. The entire premise of the bird cage liner NYT is ridiculous.The better solution to power your house when the power goes out is a generator. Far more reliable as it uses the endless supply of cheap and clean-burning natural gas.
Next