Sergio Warms up to Electrification, Even As FCA's Light-duty Diesels Get the Green Light

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s no secret that hybrids and fully electric vehicles are about as appealing to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles CEO Sergio Marchionne as a crisp, button-up shirt. The FCA boss once famously railed against his company’s sole electric offering — the tiny, money-losing Fiat 500e — for losing $10,000 for every unit sold. Placating California doesn’t come cheap.

Still, Marchionne isn’t alone in distrusting the plug. Subaru and Mazda have shown a similar aversion to electrification, though even those automakers concede it’s a losing battle. In a conference call with investors late last week, Marchionne admitted defeat, outlining a plan to add electric motors to a significant chunk of FCA’s fleet in the coming years. One division stands to go the way of Volvo, with electric motors planned for each new car introduced after 2019.

What prompted the shift in thinking? Diesel, and the public’s growing distrust in compression-ignition engines.

While Marchionne’s plan isn’t yet fleshed out on paper — a five-year plan bows early next year, covering the company’s product timeline through 2022 — the investor’s call counts as an official beginning.

“What makes [electrification] mandatory now is the fate of diesels,” he said, noting the growing crackdown by various regulators on the technology. “We have been reluctant to embrace that avenue until we saw clearer the path forward.”

The Environmental Protection Agency delivered a big wake-up call back in January, denying certification for U.S.-market Jeep Grand Cherokee and Ram 1500 models powered by the 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. A Justice Department lawsuit ensued. Only on Friday did the EPA relent, granting certification to 2017 models equipped with revised emissions software.

It’s not just regulators with fine-toothed combs weighing on Marchionne’s mind. Jurisdictions around the globe have soured on diesels, with several European cities planning a ban of oil burners in the near future. The writing’s on the wall. The company needs to look elsewhere for fuel economy and emissions savings.

Despite the company’s new direction, the same fears persist. One reason Marchionne shied away from electrification in the past was the technology’s high development cost, and he’s still not confident the company won’t get burned.

“If the cost of batteries doesn’t come down, there will be a huge increase in pricing in 2022 and that will cause shrinkage in demand,” Marchionne told investors.

Besides the recently introduced Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivan, the next “regular” FCA vehicle destined for the hybrid treatment is the next-generation Jeep Wrangler (though talk of this version seems to have dried up in recent months). Expect plenty more where this came from. While FCA’s five-year plans have proven notoriously variable, Marchionne claims 50 percent of the company’s lineup will feature some form of electrification by 2022.

At Maserati, however, that number should hit 100 percent, and much sooner. The luxury halo brand will adopt electrification on a mass scale, he said, with nearly all of its R&D dollars funneled into electric powertrain development. Whether it’s hybrid variants of existing products, such as the Levante SUV, or all-electric sports cars, like the Alfieri concept car-inspired roadster anticipated for 2020, all Maseratis will boast some measure of electric propulsion in two short years.

It remains to be seen where FCA takes the strategy on the low end of its product range, especially in North America. Lately, the automaker’s biggest investments involve the production of new generations of the Ram 1500 pickup and Wrangler. Profitable and popular, but hardly green vehicles. Assuming stable gas prices, it’s hard to see much demand for low-volume hybrid versions of these utilitarian vehicles.

Global products like Jeep’s Compass, on the other hand, almost scream for a competitive hybrid variant.

[Sources: Wards Auto, Autocar] [Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 21 comments
  • DonInYYC DonInYYC on Jul 31, 2017

    When interviewed at the Hungarian F1 race, he hinted that Maserati would be the electric brand within the FCA stable.

    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jul 31, 2017

      Well Alfa Romeo has worked out so well, why not take Maserati to electric? Wait... what do you mean we're out of money?

  • Dmoan Dmoan on Jul 31, 2017

    Maybe he should focus on making reliable vehicles before jumping to more hybrids or EV.

    • Vulpine Vulpine on Jul 31, 2017

      And what makes you think FCA's products are unreliable outside of obsolete personal reputations and biased review magazines? I've found them to be significantly better than their obsolete reputations OR CR and JDPower state. So have many other owners and certain FCA products are among the top sellers in their respective classes.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next