Dash Cam Test: ThinkWare F200 Pro

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Dash cams give you the chance to to protect yourself, in a liability sense, after a collision. They also give you the chance to review your driving should you do some spirited back-road running on a weekend.

To that end, earlier this year I tested the ThinkWare F200 Pro.

Much earlier this year. Sometimes we back-burner a story, and sometimes it ends up buried in the pantry. My bad.

I am no dash cam expert, so I am coming at this test -- and any other future dash-cam tests -- from a novice perspective. What I am looking for here is how easy it was to mount, how easy it was to use, and other aspects like that, along with how clear the picture is and that sort of thing.

Mounting proved to be the first challenge -- our initial plans to test a ThinkWare U1000 were scuttled since that camera only has permanent mounts. I didn't want to leave adhesive on the windshield of a press car, so we switched to the F200 Pro. However, that camera, too, shipped only with a permanent mount -- so that meant acquiring a suction cup mount for the camera. The cost? $14.99 plus shipping, so about $23 total.

(Full disclosure: ThinkWare loaned me a F200 Pro to use for this, and I used a press car as my test vehicle. Some costs incurred during the loan -- shipping, mainly -- were paid by ThinkWare. Other costs were paid by our parent company, VerticalScope.)

The good news is the suction-cup mount was painless to use -- I had no trouble setting it up and plugging the camera in. The F200 Pro is small and lightweight -- it won't block much of your field of vision.

For just shy of $200, you get a camera with front and rear views, and a long list of features.

Features such as full HD (1920 x 1080) @ 30 fps, a 140-degree wide-angle view, anti file-corruption, night vision, parking surveillance mode, time-lapse recording, speed- and red-light camera alert, built-in Wi-Fi, an app for iOS and Android, and support for micro-SD cards up to 128GB.

The bad news is that some of these features can only be accessed if you hardwire the cable, which likely requires professional installation. Others require you to purchase the optional GPS antenna.

The worst part of my test -- and this is on me -- is that the camera's compact size and minimalist interface means that you'll need to RTFM before you use it. Something I did not do. I just plugged it in, heard the proper beeps, and off I went.

If you want to read the manual, as you should, it's easy to do via ThinkWare's Web site or via their mobile app. Which I should've downloaded and didn't.

For the most part, this wasn't a problem, though it did cause me to not realize it was already recording, so I accidentally turned it off during my run down my favorite curvy road.

Then again, considering my speed and statutes of limitations, I may have used my own stupidity to save myself from, uh, myself.

That said, the rest of the videos, which saved in one-minute-long clips, are generally clear, and it was easy to get them downloaded to my PC.

One note: Because I didn't read the f-ing manual, I didn't play with certain settings, so the date on the videos shown here is incorrect. While I tested the camera longer ago than I care to admit, it wasn't as long ago as 2022.

There was one setting I had no trouble figuring out. I found it easy to turn the audio pickup off -- I didn't want to have to strip out audio when editing this post. You may want to leave it on so that you can hear your V8 roar or capture any conversations with Johnny Law.

The F200 Pro offers a lot of features for the money and gives a clear picture. It's lightweight, easy to mount if you don't want to deal with hardwiring and/or adhesives, and won't block too much of your vision. Its minimalist design will, however, force you to spend some time with the manual if you want to set it up just right. Trying to plug and play and learn on the fly, as I did, will keep you from maximizing its potential.

Again, that's on me. ThinkWare obviously wanted to keep this camera small, and the easiest way to do so is to minimize the amount of buttons. When the user spends time learning how to use the device before actually using it, this works well. When the user is impatient and just tries to learn as he goes, the learning curve is a little steeper.

My own idiocy aside, I was impressed with the picture quality and ease of use when it came to suction-cup mounting. The price isn't prohibitive, either, though it sucks that not only will you need to pay more for a suction-cup mount, you will also need to pay more for the GPS antenna and/or hardwire mounting in order to fully access all the features.

If you're looking for an inexpensive dash cam with a decent suite of features, the F200 Pro will do just fine. Most drivers are probably looking for something simple like this -- something they can use to prove they aren't at fault after an accident, or just to re-live a fun drive up Mulholland.

Other dash cams, including others sold by ThinkWare, will offer things like 4K HD or motorsports-specific features that you'd want to use at the track. For those just looking for a basic dash cam at an affordable price, the F200 Pro works well.

Just remember to actually read the manual before using.

[Image: ThinkWare. Videos: The author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Mebgardner Mebgardner on Dec 29, 2023

    I am curious about the frame rate. Is 30 Hz fast enough? Accidents usually happen at fast rates, and I think maybe a higher frame rate might be valuable. The tradeoff is, getting to 60 Hz means doubling the storage size for the 99.999% of the time you don't care about the data. But, I could live with that trade: storage is cheap, lawsuits are not.

  • Robert Robert on Jan 04, 2024

    Would like to see what a rear view looks like. With the existing built in storage, How long does it record before cycling through and create a new recording?

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next