Hyundai CEO Ordered To Pay His Company $60m For Money-Losing Deals

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

For years, TTAC has argued that General Motors suffers from a profound lack of accountability. Specific instances include the $2b “Fiatsco,” most of Roger Smith’s tenure, and cars like the Pontiac Aztek and Cadillac Cimmaron. Incidents like these helped GM along its decades-long plunge into bankruptcy, unchecked by the lax corporate governance of what came to be called its Board of Bystanders. Hyundai’s CEO may have received similarly lax treatment from South Korea’s criminal justice system, but at least the shareholders are standing up for their investment.


AFP [via Google] reports that Hyundai Motor Chairman, Chung Mong-Koo, has been ordered by a South Korean Seoul Central District court to pay $60 million in damages to Hyundai Motor Company. The suit was brought forward by 14 minority shareholders of Hyundai Motors and a non-governmental group called “Solidarity for Economic Reform.” This suit was brought about because shareholders believe that Chung Mong-Koo and Kim Dong-Jin brought huge losses on the company when, in 2001, Hyundai Motors participated in share sales of affiliates in the Hyundai Chaebol (Hyundai Airspace & Aircraft Co. and Hyundai Hysco).

“The court has recognised the fact that Chung made Hyundai Motor participate in the share sales to head off any threat to the Hyundai Group’s managerial rights, even though it could inflict damage on his company,” Yonhap news agency quoted the judges’ ruling as saying. “This is a case that reveals the problem of family-run management that focuses on the interests of major stockholders and the executives of Hyundai Motor.” If only GM’s investors had taken such proactive steps about the firm’s inept and insular management years ago, they might not have been wiped out in the government’s bailout/takeover.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Detroit-Iron Detroit-Iron on Feb 08, 2010

    Just like voting for the board, every shareholder should get to punch these guys once for every dollar they have lost.

  • Don1967 Don1967 on Feb 09, 2010

    Hyundai's corporate history is certainly nothing to brag about. But shareholders taking the CEO to task is a lesson the rest of the world could learn from; a positive example of free market capitalism.

  • 1995 SC On the plus side, I found a sedan I want to buy
  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Next