Is Jeep Shifting Gears? Rumors Fly Over Automatic-Only Wrangler

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

There’s been plenty of digital ink spilled over the forthcoming JL Wrangler, due out in 2018. Jeep is a huge cash cow for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, so the pressure is on to design a Wrangler which appeals to the general public and placates the hordes of rabid Jeep fans — who are known to gather torches and pitchforks at the mere suggestion of even the slightest design change.

A diesel option has been widely speculated, along with the chance of a turbocharged four-cylinder powerplant, both hooked to eight-speed automatics. Now, Andrew Collins over at the Truck Yeah arm of Jalopnik speculates the new JL could be offered solely as an automatic.

The automatic-only option was one of several possible scenarios put before the buying public at the 2016 Overland Expo. FCA representatives were clearly gathering consumer feedback before making a decision, one way or the other.

It’s an interesting notion, as more than a few offroaders consider an automatic to be the better choice for trail busting, and people who buy Wranglers with no offroad intent gravitate towards the automatic anyway. Take rate of the manual reportedly hovers between 10 and 20 percent, making it only slightly more popular than broccoli flavored ice cream at a kindergarten birthday.

At what stage does FCA stop offering an option simply for the sake of tradition?

Case in point: the Wrangler’s signature fold down windshield. With each successive iteration, the act of flipping the windshield down has become prohibitively more difficult, to the point where it’s now easier to drop the top on a Citroen Pluriel than it is to have a bugs-in-yer-teeth Wrangler experience. It begs the question whether FCA will bother engineering a drop windshield into the new JL when it will only be used by 0.0001 percent of Wrangler owners, history be damned.

It’s not a stretch to think FCA’s engineers are giving similar considerations to the Wrangler’s stick shift.

Having driven several examples, I enjoy a manual transmission Wrangler, even if its shifter does feel like a Louisville Slugger with only the most tenuous of attachments to anything inside a gearbox. Our Managing Editor feels differently, calling it “garbage,” “undriveable,” and stating that the Wrangler is one of the very few vehicles where a manual option makes no sense.

He may have a point. After all, we live on a planet where the entire Ferrari catalog is unavailable with three pedals and the rest of the world is rapidly following suit.

What say you, B&B? Does the prospect of a slushbox-only Wrangler send you into a rabid froth? Or do you tire quickly of needing three legs to drive slowly offroad?

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 99 comments
  • Mikein08 Mikein08 on May 26, 2016

    The ONLY advantage of a manual tranny in off-road situations is when you are descending a very steep hill using compound low. You'll go slower. If you have an automatic in such a situation, you just ride your brakes. New brakes are a lot cheaper than clutches. The biggest advantage of an automatic tranny off-road is that you can concentrate of driving instead of shifting. And yes, I've driven both in really rough off-road situations.

  • Pete Zaitcev Pete Zaitcev on May 27, 2016

    Chrysler was preparing the public for this for many years by doing two things: they installed garbage manuals into jeeps and denied the 3rd hand kit in JK.

  • Plaincraig 1975 Mercury Cougar with the 460 four barrel. My dad bought it new and removed all the pollution control stuff and did a lot of upgrades to the engine (450hp). I got to use it from 1986 to 1991 when I got my Eclipse GSX. The payments and insurance for a 3000GT were going to be too much. No tickets no accidents so far in my many years and miles.My sister learned on a 76 LTD with the 350 two barrel then a Ford Escort but she has tickets (speeding but she has contacts so they get dismissed or fine and no points) and accidents (none her fault)
  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
  • ToolGuy If I were a teen under the tutelage of one of the B&B, I think it would make perfect sense to jump straight into one of those "forever cars"... see then I could drive it forever and not have to worry about ever replacing it. This plan seems flawless, doesn't it?
  • Rover Sig A short cab pickup truck, F150 or C/K-1500 or Ram, preferably a 6 cyl. These have no room for more than one or two passengers (USAA stats show biggest factor in teenage accidents is a vehicle full of kids) and no back seat (common sense tells you what back seats are used for). In a full-size pickup truck, the inevitable teenage accident is more survivable. Second choice would be an old full-size car, but these have all but disappeared from the used car lots. The "cute small car" is a death trap.
  • W Conrad Sure every technology has some environmental impact, but those stuck in fossil fuel land are just not seeing the future of EV's makes sense. Rather than making EV's even better, these automakers are sticking with what they know. It will mean their end.
Next