2024 Subaru Crosstrek Wilderness Review -- Easy Wheelin'

Subaru has given its popular Crosstrek crossover its most significant update in quite some time. The little SUV has been changed front, back, and sideways. But the change that grabbed all the headlines involved the expansion of the Wilderness lineup, which now includes the Crosstrek.


If you’ve been under a rock, the brand’s Wilderness models are the most “Subaru” Subaru makes. They’re more off-road oriented than others and often come with a recognizable shade of blue and some coppery-yellow accents. Wilderness models have become immensely popular since their introduction, so much so that during our briefing in a tent outside Zion National Park in Utah, we were told that one in five Outbacks and Foresters are sold as Wilderness models and that figures for the latest Wilderness model would be similar. As we set out into the Utah wilderness to see just how off-road ready a CUV with a CVT is, we were given one last look at what surely looks to be a recipe for sales success.

Disclosure: Subaru put me on an airplane to Zion National Park, tossed me the keys to the new Subaru Crosstrek Wilderness for a day, and fed me while they were at it. We were told that “hot” showers could be expected, and the air quotes indeed proved necessary at the glamping resort we stayed at, where Subaru left us some nice schwag. I’ll be donating mine to friends, family, or the homeless – though the memory of a tepid lever-operated shower in a 50-degree tent will be mine to keep forever.


Aesthetically, Subaru has done everything right with the smallest member of the Wilderness family. It just looks right with a roof rack on it – apparently, it’s supposed to. Subaru tells me that the designers actually started sketching the model with a basket on the roof, so frequent is customers' use of them. Of course, the visual mass is up high with this one, thanks mostly to a total of 9.3 inches of ground clearance. This is largely provided by new shocks and springs, and Yokohama Geolandar all-terrain tires mounted to a smaller 17-inch wheel.

The Wilderness gets its own unique look thanks mostly to plastic cladding. The logic there is that the stuff is going to get banged up off-road, so it might as well be unpainted and cheap to replace. Even the mirrors are plastic, and if you peek underneath you’ll find a skid plate too.


Updates for Wilderness models can be found inside, too. That coppery accenting worms its way inside, and you’ll find it just about everywhere you look. The floor mat in the rear hatch reads “SUBARU WILDERNESS” in a similar shade, and the seats are trimmed in stitching that matches the color. There’s also a final flash of it on the steering wheel. The whole thing feels more upscale than past Subaru models – a good thing when your brand’s whole schtick is providing a fully loaded product for a few thousand less than the competition’s best stuff. Other “rugged” changes include the seats, which are trimmed in a waterproof cloth/vegan leather mix called “StarTex.” That’s great for outdoorsy types, but it does have a drawback the average smiling Millenial family with a labrador may overlook. Those seats get you nice and sweaty because of their waterproof capabilities. So be prepared to put up with some back sweat in exchange for the ability to hose down your seats.

Storage capacity is standard for a Crosstrek. It’s big enough to fit any number of outdoor toys, and if you can’t fit it, the seats fold if that’s not enough. If that isn’t enough, you can tow it (up to 3,500 lbs). I like that the seats feature the same rubber material on the back as the floor mats, so your gear doesn’t mess up the seats too badly. The headliner is black for the same reason.


The rest of the Crosstrek Wilderness’ guts are familiar Subaru fare. What isn’t used by the company in its other models will be familiar to anyone who’s sat in a new Crosstrek, center touchscreen and steering wheel included. Thankfully, Subaru has finally fixed my biggest gripe with the tech – phone mirroring software like CarPlay now takes up the whole screen, rather than the small block it previously did. This greatly improves usability.


Speaking of tech, Subaru EyeSight, the brand’s suite of active and passive safety features, is standard on Wilderness models. This includes features like pre-collision braking, adaptive cruise control, lane-keep assist, and more. Knowing its customers, Subaru also ensured the system would work with modified and lifted Crosstreks.


Open the graphic-clad hood, and you’ll find the same 182 horsepower, 2.5-liter flat-four as in a number of other Subarus. It’ll be mated to the same continuously variable transmission that drives all four wheels, as in a number of other Subarus. Torque is an acceptable-for-the-size 176 lb-ft. This is on the more powerful end of the spectrum for the segment, matching the Ford Bronco Sport to within a few digits, but falling some 20 horsepower short of the Jeep Compass engine. However, load the car down with gear, and this athleticism could give way to asthma.


Regardless, power isn’t the star of the show. Wilderness models get even more mechanical changes to make them more suitable for, well, it’s in the name. This includes a more powerful radiator fan. Other changes include a shorter 4.11 final drive ratio, a transmission cooler, and an upgraded rear differential to better handle the elements.

The Wilderness also makes use of Subaru’s X-Mode system and hill-descent control. The former is special programming for the all-wheel drive system that comes in two varieties. Snow/Dirt and Snow/Mud modes use a brake-based torque vectoring system to get power to the wheels that have the most traction. In the Snow/Mud mode, this means allowing more slip in the system to get you through the tough stuff, while the other is more restrictive, focusing more on outright traction.


Let’s talk money while we’re here. For all this tech, you’re spending $31,995 MSRP. There is an optional upgrade package that you really ought to get, too. For $2,270, plus $1,295 for delivery, you’re looking at a $35,560 car. That optional package gets you a 10-way power driver’s seat, a 10-speaker Harmon Kardon sound system, and a power moonroof. In all, it’s pretty competitive considering the Bronco Sport Badland’s $38,390 price point.


To drive the Crosstrek Wilderness, in almost every situation but the extreme, is to drive a Crosstrek. If you’d like to know what that’s like, I will direct you to Chris Tonn’s lovely review of the 2024 Crosstrek. With its more off-road-focused tires and suspension, I’d consider this a feat all its own. However, the Wilderness is really all about the scenario in which the outdoor enthusiast will want for just a little more sauce. As with the previous Wilderness models, the Crosstrek happily provides.


Subaru set up a little off-road course for us to test this out on. It consisted of grades that, from the cockpit, felt more like the side of a skyscraper than a 45-degree incline, deep rutted roads, and muddy terrain. Starting with that last item, it is perhaps where the Crosstrek felt its most uncertain. Bathing the Wilderness in the slippery stuff made it very apparent that you’d want some more serious tires – not that the Yokos are going to break up the band.

X-Mode makes just about everything else easy – though it’s worth keeping in mind that Subaru’s own car had better perform on the course Subaru picked. It handled steep inclines with little fuss, and the traction control system could be felt working at its hardest only in very few scenarios. I’m extremely impressed with the way the Crosstrek handled itself off-road. The steering makes it clear where your wheels are pointing, and the extra clearance and protection are going to be enough for all but the most serious off-road aficionados.

I’m also happy with the car’s on-road manners. It’s just a Crosstrek, after all. While the seats could be more breathable and softer, the cabin is quiet, and the ride is smooth over anything but the nastiest pavement. Really, it’s almost impossible to fault the Crosstrek save for the above (and the occasional groan of the CVT).


The Wilderness trim is exactly what Subaru needed. I’ve got no witnesses, and everyone who drove the Crosstrek Wilderness alongside me has probably said the same thing at some point, but I said years ago that Subaru should lift the Crosstrek further because they’d sell enough to start building STI models again. Well, they have, and it looks like selling every last one of them is exactly what’s about to happen.


[Images © 2023 Chase Bierenkoven/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chase Bierenkoven
Chase Bierenkoven

Chase Bierenkoven has been writing about cars in his head since he was a child. Now, he does it for real, covering automotive news and producing reviews for outlets like Edmunds, Forbes Wheels and CarBuzz. Chase's career as an automotive journalist began in 2020, and he has already written scores of road tests. Some favorites of Chase's include the Dodge Challenger 392, Mazda Miata, Kia EV6 and Bentley Bentayga. Outside his work with cars, Chase is often found justifying his latest broken German sports car to anyone that will listen or enjoying the outdoor spaces of his native Colorado.

More by Chase Bierenkoven

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Legacygt Legacygt on Oct 03, 2023

    Great review. I've only driven one Wilderness model (an Outback provided as a dealer loaner) and I found the handling a little sloppy on-pavement. It's good to hear they managed to give the Crosstrek the Wilderness treatment without hurting the on-pavement experience.

    And this is the first time I've read a review that dared to criticize Star Tex seats. I find the material interesting and low maintenance and fairly comfortable but I totally agree that it rates very poorly for breathability. It's so bad that I think Subaru should offer it with some sort of ventilated option. 5 minutes on a hot day and you're sitting in a pool of sweat.

  • Zznalg Zznalg on Oct 04, 2023

    Now, a slam of Subaru. I own an Outback Wilderness. Subaru has capitulated to lawyers and the regulatory environment to render life with their vehicles quite unpleasant. A few cases in point: The vehicles won't allow you to drive one MPH without ALL the seatbelts fastened. You cannot pull a Subaru out of a garage or parking space with no seatbelt without the car screaming at you. First there is the annoying beeping. After a few seconds Subaru ups its game and raised the volume ridiculously. To get it to shut up, I've even had to turn off the car and open a door. It is not enough to put it into park. The beeping continues. I am Not talking about driving without a seatbelt. I'm talking about 1 MPH maneuvers in one's own driveway. Next, the car's auto-breaking is tuned to slow you down or even slam on your brakes at every possible opportunity. The other day, my Wilderness decided to do just that almost resulting in my being rear ended. For NO reason. Next, the Outback Wilderness' transmission is tuned to prevent forward motion. It does its best to NOT GIVE POWER in nearly every situation unless you keep the accelerator depressed for more than 1-3 seconds. This is actually unsafe. In fact at highway speeds, when one presses the gas, the car momentarily reduces power and slows down. The paddle shifters help. But overall, Subaru has so neutered the Outback Wilderness to make a potentially great vehicle quite a drag to own and actually unsafe, in the service seemingly of preventing lawsuits and satisfying the EPA. I know not all of this may apply to the Crosstrek Wilderness but if you test drive one, you would be advised to look for these flaws.

  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.
Next