2023 Honda HR-V EX-L AWD Review – Enticing Yet Flawed

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Honda HR-V EX-L AWD Fast Facts

Powertrain
2.0-liter four-cylinder (158 horsepower @ 6,500 RPM, 138 lb-ft @ 4,200 RPM)
Transmission/Drive-Wheel Layout
Continuously-variable automatic, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
25 city / 30 highway / 27 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
9.4 city / 7.8 highway / 8.7 combined (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$28,950 (U.S.) / $37,130 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$30,590 (U.S.) / $39, 563.50 (Canada)
Prices include $1,245 destination charge in the United States and $2,133.50 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Once upon a time, the Honda HR-V was a nice little affordable urban runabout with a cramped interior, unremarkable dynamics, and boring styling.

The 2023 Honda HR-V is a much nicer package, with a roomier, nicer cabin and styling that will get noticed – though not necessarily in a good way.


It also offers handling that actually has some verve – Honda remembered that they’re Honda – and a comfy ride. Now, let’s talk about giving that engine some more guts. And giving this crossover some better tires.

The 2.0-liter four-cylinder makes 158 horsepower and just 138 lb-ft of torque, and that’s disappointing. There’s a lack of passing punch here, and merging takes some planning. The HR-V could be a fun little urban commuter if it had, say, 200 lb-ft of torque. Maybe even 175. But there’s just not enough grunt here.

The other thing that’s lacking is rubber – the tires here give up the ghost a bit too easily when pushed, especially if the pavement is a bit wet. Yes, yes, we know – few folks are slaloming a small crossover around an autocross. But even accounting for vehicle type and use case, Honda should shoe the HR-V with grippier tires.

Especially since the handling here is good enough that you might want to have a little back-road fun, crossover or not. For reference, my test car had the available all-wheel drive system.

Credit the MacPherson strut suspension up front and rear multi-link for this. The electric power steering manages to feel actually connected to the road and not too artificial.

At least the continuously-variable automatic transmission doesn’t annoy. Most of us disdain CVTs but this is one of the better ones.

The HR-V’s interior will be familiar to anyone who has spent time in the Civic, and that’s a good thing. It looks classy, it’s functional, and everything just sort of works. There’s leg- and headroom a plenty, and the seats are comfy. The only downside is that some materials feel cheap, especially in the top-trim EX-L I drove – a vehicle that costs $30,590. Oh, wait, there’s one more downside – the tacked-on infotainment screen.

Honda gave the HR-V new styling, and it’s more than a tad polarizing, thanks to the snub-nose shape. It looks better in person than in pictures, but it’s still a bit of a puzzling choice. Similarly puzzling was the decision to not include a power tailgate – something competitors offer.

My test unit – a top-trim EX-L with all-wheel drive – had a base price of $28,950. That price included features such as leather seats, heated front seats, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, blind-spot information monitor, rear cross-traffic monitor, driver attention monitor, Bluetooth, satellite radio, USB, keyless starting, wireless phone charger, dual-zone climate control, 17-inch wheels, LED headlights and taillights, keyless entry, remote start, adaptive cruise control, collision-mitigation braking, lane-keeping assist, road-departure mitigation, and traffic-jam assist. The only option was the $395 Nordic Forest paint.

Taken as a whole, I found the HR-V to be a pretty decent choice as a small crossover – and it’s certainly a more appealing choice than it was before. It needs a bit more power, a better tire choice, and some nicer interior materials to really stand out. As for the divisive looks, well, keep in mind you don’t have to see the grille while driving.

Honda took a huge step in the right direction with this generation of the HR-V. A few tweaks and the company will have one of the stronger entries at this price point.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Tonycd Tonycd on Jul 11, 2023

    Tell me about it. I have a family member whose CR-V has been soldiering on for over 20 years now.

  • Joel Sturm Joel Sturm on Jul 20, 2023

    My 2011 CR-V continues on--like new. In all this time, with lots of kilometers, two items have "given up"--the a/c compressor and the actuator in the passenger front door. This isn't bad for a pleasurable, reliable vehicle entering its teenage years. I've owned and driven autos from GM, Ford, Chrysler, Honda, and Mercedes-Benz. My current buddy, the '11 CR-V, is by far the most reliable and most pleasurable to drive--especially in a blizzard, grin. I believe that my CR-V and I will will be "friends" well into its "twenties".

  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next