Smell Ya Later: Detroit Council Urges Stellantis to Buy Area Homes

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

In the latest development of what’s been a long-running saga involving strange odors from the Detroit Assembly Complex - Mack facility, city council members in Detroit are calling on Stellantis to relocate some residents who have been impacted by the issue.


According to Automotive News and other sources, the council has authorized a decision urging the automaker to “offer home buyouts at fair market value.” Note they are not requiring them to carry out this plan, instead making something of a strong suggestion. Whether the company will follow this guidance is, at present, unclear but Stellantis has apparently set aside $1.8 million to equip some homes near the plant with new windows, HVAC gear, and air monitors. As anyone who has ever taken on a home reno will tell you, that amount will likely be consumed very quickly.


Issues stem back a couple of years to the start of production at Mack. Neighbors were soon complaining of odd smells they felt were related to vehicle paint products, and Stellantis was quickly on the receiving end of half a dozen violations relating to air quality – not all of which were confined to the Mack facility. While spox insist the place is within permitted limits and their interim solutions have been effective, it would seem the problem is persistent.


In its present form, Mack is home to the production of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, its 4xe variant, and the long-wheelbase Grand Cherokee L. Roughly 2.5 million square feet of floor space on 178 acres provide employment for nearly 5,000 hourly workers and over 200 salaried personnel. To put it mildly, the place is important to Jeep and the UAW. The space was once used for powertrain assembly before Stellantis plowed about $1.6 billion into it for Grand Cherokee production. Automotive activity on the site dates all the way back to 1916 when the Michigan Stamping Company set up shop.


Part of that $1.6 billion investment was an all-new facility set to be used as a paint shop – ostensibly the place from which the obnoxious paint smells are emanating. Stretching almost a million square feet over five floors, this place handles all aspects from a phosphate e-coat to primers, base coats, and final clear coats. Which part of the process is causing these issues has yet to be publicly identified.


[Image: Stellantis]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Glennbk Glennbk on Feb 14, 2023

    Why aren't the dealing with the source? Doesn't it make sense for Stellantis to filter and scrub the emissions before they exit the plant.

  • IBx1 IBx1 on Feb 14, 2023

    A polluting factory should be held accountable; they make all that money so they can eat that cost if they don't want to cut their pollution.

  • JK Savoy Blue is a thing, but Sestriere White? Sestriere is a ski town near Turin, so I guess it meant to conjure up thoughts of snow. Pretty car. I hope Pininfarina has success. The industry in and around Turin has taken a big hit and is a shadow of its former self.
  • Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
  • TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
  • John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
Next