Nissan Prices Murano for 2024, Drops Base Trim

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

As the calendar flips into 2024, Nissan is staying the course with just a few tweaks to its midsize Murano crossover, a machine that has been on sale largely unchanged for about the last 10 years.


Soldiering into this model year, the least expensive Murano is now the front-wheel drive SV model which pastes an asking price of $37,920 on its Monroney, a sum just a couple hundred simoleons more than last year. However, the el-cheapo S trim has hit the bin, meaning the price of entry has risen by a couple of grand. We suspect the SV and SL are Murano’s volume trims anyway, so Nissan’s choice to leave the S on the factory floor shouldn’t raise too many eyebrows. Elsewhere, the SL now gets a powered panoramic sunroof as a standard kit, bumping its price to $41,880, while the top-rung Platinum commands $45,930.

This rig’s powertrain specs are familiar for ’24, showing up as a 3.5-liter engine rated for 260 horsepower and 240 lb-ft of torque. This is lashed to a continuously variable transmission, operating under the Xtronic banner and depressingly recognizable to anyone who’s been in a Nissan showroom over the last decade. Front-wheel drive is standard but all-wheel drive is available for 1,700 smackers across the board.


The departure of the S means Nissan’s suppliers no longer need to deliver cloth seats for this thing, nor do they need to fire up the milling machines for basic wheels or even manually adjusted passenger perches. Gauges remain analog when most competitors have long switched to digital real estate and an 8-inch infotainment screen is among the segment’s smallest. Still, modern touches like USB-C ports and the like crop up around the interior, though this gotta be one of the few machines in 2024 to come standard with a CD player on some trims.

Cynical readers will say this sort of feature consolidation is a harbinger of the model’s impending cancellation – and combined with the lack of meaningful updates in recent years to the Murano, plus an industry’s obsession with electrification, they may have a point. Still, compared to other Nissan models, it’s not like the Murano is stuck to showroom floors; through the first half of 2023, the brand moved 21,188 of the things, far and away from the 147,745 Rogue crossovers but well ahead of the hulking Armada. For comparison, the also-outdated Ford Edge sold 46,484 units during the same time frame.


[Images: Nissan]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • CoastieLenn CoastieLenn on Sep 04, 2023

    I’m coming to this article 4 days late because I currently have a ‘19 SV as a rental here on Maui. I can’t believe how well mannered this is, even with the CVT. It’s a little bit sluggish off the line when you boot it, but every other circumstance, it’s great. 33k rental miles is equivalent to 100k normal miles, and aside from some loud tires, it’s whisper quiet over bumps and no squeaks/rattles in the interior. My boss has a ‘23 Altima SV as a rental and her seats are much more comfortable, but the units in my Murano are perfectly adequate.


    Im pleasantly surprised! Surprised enough to add it to my list of potential purchases when I move back to the mainland and have to sell my ‘12 Fusion that I absolutely love.

  • Redapple2 Redapple2 on Sep 05, 2023

    Little off topic. New Rogue is good looking.

  • 2ACL My girlfriend currently drives a 2018 SE hatch. Automatic, but I've been handling the fluid services (looking to do another along with the filter soon) and it's been a solid runner for her. My only issue with its dynamics is the transmission's gingerly kick down out of corners (the SEL is the lowest trim that offers manual control functionality IIRC). Otherwise, none of the quirks that've blighted the Powershift's reputation have manifested.A stick would drastically extend its life expectancy. I know she isn't as committed to stick life though, which influenced my approval.
  • MaintenanceCosts GM hasn't put any effort into any Cadillacs except the Blackwings and the electrics. They're getting out what they put in. Pretty simple, really.The XT4/5/6 are all just slightly up-styled versions of Chevy products, but priced as if they were on dedicated luxury platforms like the BMW and Benz competitors to the larger two. The XT6 is especially embarrassing.Even the Escalade is just a Tahoe/Suburban with a few trick design touches and a halfhearted materials upgrade. The good news for Cadillac is that the Tahoe/Suburban are seen as upscale enough that a half-a$s upgrade to them can be a legitimate luxury car.Where's the "gotta have it" factor? Where are the dazzling interior designs? Where's the swagger? Until those show up the brand is just a set of memories.
  • Dwford The problem with Cadillac is that the only Cadillac they sell is the Escalade. Cadillacs are supposed to be large imposing vehicles that are visually impressive. Only the Escalade meets that standard. Everything else Cadillac sells are knock off BMWs. Cadillac shouldn't be in the business of selling compact 4 cylinder crossovers. Dime a dozen vehicles. You'd be better off buying a high trim version of any mainstream crossover than an XT4. Why does a CT4 start at the same price as a Camry XSE? Why do Buicks have nicer interiors than Cadillacs? Why to CHEVYS have nicer interiors than Cadillacs?
  • EBFlex “Insatiable demand” Pretty sad when even the Uber deranged EU doesn’t want EVs.
  • Jbltg Had a rental like this once, stock of course. NYC to Vermont. Very smooth and quiet, amazing fuel economy. Not the best for interior space though. Back seat and trunk barely usable.
Next