Mercedes-AMG Brings Entry-Trim SL 43 to America

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Let’s be clear: this so-called ‘entry’ model of the tremendous SL roadster still costs six figures and has just 14 fewer horsepower than the vaunted R129-era V12 convertible – despite having precisely one-third the number of cylinders.

Set to be called the SL 43, this open-top 2+2-seater features a 2.0L turbocharged engine breathed upon by AMG and featuring an electric exhaust gas turbocharger. What’s that, you say? Glad you asked. Merc claims this technology is a “direct derivative” of developments used by the Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 team, a fact which can be used whilst bragging about your new car to buddies at the beach house in Malibu. 

Said to provide quick throttle response across the rpm range, the turbo is operated via the car’s 48-volt electrical system, a piece of kit which also feeds the belt-driven starter-generator. Electronically controlled, this drives the shaft of the turbocharger directly to accelerate the compressor wheel before the exhaust gas flow takes over the drive it in a conventional manner. Fun fact: the turbo can spin at speeds up to 170,000 rpm which seems to be the approximate speed of the blades on your author’s Lasko 3300 Wind Machine box fan on setting number three. All this – the turbo, not my cooling device in the garage – is good for an output of 375 horses and 354 lb-ft of twist. Exclusively rear-wheel drive, an AMG 9-speed automatic is part of the deal and 60 mph should appear in less than 5 seconds.


This inclusion of a small-displacement engine should not strike fear in the hearts of traditionalists. After all, the R129 was available for years with a six-pot engine making 228 ponies – just three more than a Mustang GT, at the time – though it could be had with a five-speed manual. Gearheads insist this configuration was actually the one to get, despite the V8 option grabbing all the magazine headlines. They were probably right.

This trim will retain many of the interior tricks which makes the current SL a treat, such as the 11.9-inch central touchscreen which may be electrically adjusted from 12 to 32 degrees during times when the California sun is being annoying. Heated and cooled seats, Nappa leather, LCD instrument cluster – all are present and accounted for. Having spent ample time behind the wheel of a more powerful variant, I can confidently assert it is a very nice place in which to while away the hours.


The SL 43 will be arriving in American dealerships this summer.


[Images: Mercedes]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 22 comments
  • RHD RHD on May 25, 2023

    It will get lots of compliments at the gas station and in the parking lot. Give me one with a manual transmission, please. The price is outrageous, though. The only purchasers will be elderly millionaires, trying to keep their 30-something gold digger around a little longer by buying her another trinket.

    • See 1 previous
    • RHD RHD on May 26, 2023

      In the box below, where it says "Share your car truths here!", write what you want to say, check it for spelling and grammar, and hit "Comment".


  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on May 25, 2023

    48 Volts?!? That is way too scary.

    Signed, Your Favorite OEM


  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next