Hertz CEO Leaves After Buying 100,000 Teslas

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Almost all of us have made a boneheaded purchase or three in our lives. But few are notable as the debacle at Hertz, a company which most gearheads know decided to buy tens of thousands of electric vehicles only to bin them at severely subvented prices. Now, the CEO is stepping down from his role.

Readers will recall Hertz made the decision in 2021 to go all-in on electric vehicles, committing to buying a hundred thousand Tesla cars which would clearly expand its fleet of EVs by leaps and bounds. Just over two years later, the company cited low demand and high repair costs as some reasons for divesting large swaths of its EV fleet. This flood of product on the used car market surely didn’t help valuations of the things, though nor did Tesla itself during a round of its own price cuts.


Thoughts on why the EV experiment at Hertz didn’t work are all over the map, with extreme reactions from both ends of EV fandom being as annoying as they are predictable. The truth, as always, likely lies somewhere in the middle. Our own Matt Posky rightly points out it’s a function of how rental cars are generally used, where it is not unusual for renters to pile on 700 miles in a day. This can be difficult in an EV.


Also not helping matters is that Hertz seems to have invested in the cars but not any supporting infrastructure. If, as most reports indicate, the company took equal approach to an EV’s returning state of charge as it does with an ICE car’s fuel level, that means renters would have been required to loiter at a Level 3 charger prior to returning the thing. Raise your hand if you’ve ever skidded sideways into the last gas station before hitting the rental place, having forgotten to fuel up with only a short amount of time before yer flight leaves? Exactly. If Hertz had baked something into their plans which plunked numerous Level 3 DC chargers at each location, along with provisions in the rental agreement for bringing the thing back with few electrons in the battery, things might have turned out differently.


But they didn’t, so it hasn’t. And, as a result, CEO Stephen Scherr is out on his ear. Don’t feel too badly – it is reported in 2022 he raked in $182.1 million including $178 million in stock awards and a salary of $1.27 million. A filing by Hertz is said to have stated “Mr. Scherr’s wages for 2022, calculated for purposes of his Form W-2 issued by the company, were $27,181,395.”


[Image: Hertz via video screenshot]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 61 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 20, 2024

    He should have bought the used Teslas with his stock options. How many used Tesla dealers are there? He could have started a national chain!

    • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Mar 21, 2024

      If he had been real smart, he should have started a franchise of repair shops specializing in Teslas and other EVs. Cannibalize all those extra Teslas for spare parts, one week turn around, 60 day guarantee!! Folks would have been lined up at the garage door!!


  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Mar 21, 2024

    Another problem with Teslas as rental cars: Their unusual ergonomics take some time to figure out. When you get into a rental car, you want to quickly come up to speed on the basic controls so you can be on your way. This is not so easy in a Tesla.

  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
  • Willie If both nations were actually free market economies I would be totally opposed. The US is closer to being one, but China does a lot to prop up the sectors they want to dominate allowing them to sell WAY below cost, functionally dumping their goods in our market to destroy competition. I have seen this in my area recently with shrimp farmed by Chinese comglomerates being sold super cheap to push local producers (who have to live at US prices and obey US laws) out of business.China also has VERY lax safety and environmental laws which reduce costs greatly. It isn't an equal playing field, they don't play fair.
  • Willie ~300,000 Camrys and ~200,000 Accords say there is still a market. My wife has a Camry and we have no desire for a payment on something that has worse fuel economy.
Next