Ford Hires a Chief Transition Officer

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Last month, we brought you news about Ford CEO Jim Farley lamenting to investors that his company was number one – in recalls. At the time, he refused to place all the blame at the convenient feet of the world’s supply chain, instead pledging some company overhauls – perhaps at the personnel level.


Enter one John Dion, a corporate boss who has apparently implemented so-called ‘lean systems’ at other large companies. His title? Chief Transition Officer.


According to the company, Dion will oversee the global deployment of methodologies and tools based on Lean manufacturing and related concepts, capabilities that are central to realizing the value-creation and growth potential of the company’s Ford+ plan. That’s a lot of PR word salad, but the upshot is the company seems intent on righting the ship in terms of quality and production consistency.


“Henry Ford was doing Lean manufacturing decades before anyone even defined the term,” Farley said. “High value and quality, continuous flow, rooting out waste,” he continued. “John’s an expert in all of the principles of Lean, and he and his team will provide our culture the urgency, guidance and support we need to reassert and raise Ford’s reputation for excellence, thrift and growth.”


Cars appear nowhere on Dion’s resumé, which could be very good or very bad. Past outsider hires in this industry have been a mixed bag at best. His most recent role was VP at a fabrication and specialty gas-control technology company; prior to that, he spent 24 years at a global science and technology company called Danaher. It was in that job he directed the application of kaizen-based Lean manufacturing. This is what he’s hired to do at Ford, reporting directly to Farley. 


An estimated 60 percent of Ford’s electric vehicle customers are said to be new to the brand, with Dearborn’s EV growth coming at about twice the rate of the all-electric segment in general. Work needs to be done in most corners of the enterprise, however, with EVs not immune to quality problems (see: F-150 Lightning battery flap) and some of their most popular gasoline-powered models failing to even come close to meeting demand (here’s lookin’ at you, Bronco).


Dion starts his new job on April 3.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Mar 22, 2023

    His tenure will be commensurate with the authority he wields. There will be groups and individuals who don't like his suggestions:

    • 'no problems in my department'
    • 'that change costs money'
    • 'that change costs jobs'
    • 'we've used that supplier for years'
    • 'I'll miss my bonus objective if I do that'


    Ford needs to stop talking about Henry and the F-Series.


    Speaking of the F-Series, 26% of the F-150s within 200 miles of me are 2022 or older. Demand is waning.

    • EBFlex EBFlex on Mar 22, 2023

      How is that indicative that demand is waning?



  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Mar 23, 2023

    Ford is near #1 in recalls in North America.

    Another numb-nut in the C-Suite is an attempt to avoid responsibility.

    Instead of spending money on another layer of mis-management, how about spending the money on the vehicles!!


    "STOP THE HURT"

    "STOP THE PAIN"

    "I DON"T WANT MY CAR SPENDING MORE TIME AT THE DEALERSHIP AGAIN"

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next