BMW Boss: Big Screens To Be Replaced By Big HUDs

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Automotive technology is developing at a dizzying pace, but that rapid progress has created quite a few side effects along the way. Take screens, for example. It’s illegal to even hold a cell phone while driving in many states, yet there’s a large screen on the dash of almost every new car today – sometimes more than one. BMW’s board chair has thoughts on the issue and believes we’ll see a big shift in how screens are used in the next few years.


Automotive News reports that at CES 2023, Oliver Zipse said, “In 10 years, that is gone. Probably the regulator will not allow it,” speaking of the touchscreens and displays in the center consoles of new cars. He also noted that distracted driving is a more significant source of accidents than speed.

BMW is working toward that vision and will roll out a new head-up display system in vehicles by 2025. The technology will expand the size of BMW’s HUD systems with more information and visuals that can be seen by everyone in the car.


A large display splattered across the windshield sounds slightly more distracting than a touchscreen in the center stack, but BMW is working toward a just-in-time display that shows information only when it’s needed. The company showed an early version of the system in its Dee concept car. The visuals accompanying the car show a display that stretches the width of the windshield but only at the bottom. The driver controls the system using a touch slider on the dash.

[Images: BMW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 10 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 06, 2023

    "Automotive technology is developing at a dizzying pace"

    Is it? Or just starting to catch up with the rest of the world after decades of relative stagnation?

    • See 1 previous
    • Slavuta Slavuta on Jan 07, 2023

      It is step forward and 1.5 back. As usual. Lets say we want to improve efficiency. Ok. The manufacturers spend time and money to pull that 1 mile extra per gallon. They make cars incredibly more expensive for that. And spend a lot of actual energy to produce the additional sophisticated engine components.

      Then, they go and put those cheap tires and brake rotors that last 30K miles. Now, you need to replace these and manufacturers need to spend additional energy and material to produce new, and recycle old. Because most economical way is when part lasts longer on the car.


      How do digital screens improve my life in the car? - they don't.

  • Wheatridger Wheatridger on Jan 09, 2023

    Rather this this, I'd rather have a car with just a speedo, gas gauge and some warning lights. My problem is I don't regard driving as a data-driven activity. I rarely need data, I just need to maintain my attention and situational awareness. The most important screen in my car is the one the Brits call "the windscreen."

  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next