Audi Urbansphere: A Trojan Horse

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Back when everyone still bought into the hype surrounding self-driving cars, automakers were releasing concept vehicles framed as a “lounge on wheels.” The theory was that once autonomous vehicles hit the mainstream, companies would begin dropping futuristic models with swanky interiors because drivers would no longer be responsible for piloting the car for the duration of its journey. However, the public eventually learned that autonomous driving technologies had failed to progress as promised and would likely come with a host of restrictions plenty of drivers wouldn’t be interested in once the wrinkles had been ironed out.

But there are a whole host of markets to be tapped, the public has a relatively short-term memory, and there’s always a chance that some major headway was made during the last few years of development. So we’ve seen a resurgence of mobility talk from the industry, especially as it relates to all-electric vehicles. Case in point is the Audi Urbansphere — an autonomous concept vehicle designed for “Chinese megacities” but allegedly perfect for a metropolitan area near you.

“Systematically designed from the inside out, Audi has unveiled plans for the Audi urbansphere [sic] concept car. Designers and engineers initially created the Audi urbansphere for use in traffic-dense Chinese megacities, although the concept is also suitable for any other metropolitan center in the world,” the manufacturer explained. “In these urban areas, where personal space is in particularly short supply, the concept car offers the largest interior space of any Audi to date. It intelligently coordinates this with technologies and digital services that appeal to all the senses and offer a whole new level of experience.”

The Urbansphere is effectively a minivan (MPV to our European readers) and a clear evolution of the brand’s 2021 Grandsphere and Skysphere concepts. It’s an undeniably cool premise, embodying the best aspects of what self-driving can offer. But it remains difficult to imagine a world where such vehicles exist without there being massive changes to existing safety regulations and a meaningful leap forward in relevant technologies. Mapping, sensing hardware, and machine learning have all improved — it’s just not obvious they’ve reached the point where SAE Level 4 (or better) autonomous driving is realistic.

But concept cars only exist to foreshadow real products some of the time. Plenty take the stage as a way to draw attention and prove that the brand has an abundance of vision. The Urbansphere seems to fit more neatly into the latter category — though we wouldn’t be shocked to see some of its features and design elements eventually appearing in future production models. Sadly, they probably won’t be the kind of things you’re actually interested in.

From Audi:

“To make e-mobility even more attractive, we think about it holistically and from the customer’s needs,” says [Audi chairman] Markus Duesmann. More than ever before, it is not just the product that is decisive, but the entire ecosystem. That is why Audi is creating a comprehensive ecosystem with services for the entire car. The Audi urbansphere concept also offers everyone onboard a wide range of options to use that freedom to provide a highly-personalized in-car experience: communication or relaxation, work or withdrawal into a private sphere as desired. As such, it transforms from being strictly an automobile into an “experience device.'”

Thanks to Audi’s own options and the ability to integrate digital services from other providers, the possibilities are nearly endless. These can be used to access a wide range of services related to the current trip. The vehicle also takes care of everyday tasks that go beyond the ride itself – such as making dinner reservations or shopping online from the car. In addition, the autonomous Audi urbansphere concept picks up its passengers at home and independently takes care of finding a parking space and charging the battery.

Customized infotainment offerings are also available, such as the seamless integration of onboard music and video streaming services. Audi will also offer customers exclusive perks, including access to concerts, cultural events, and sporting events based on their individual preferences.

The whole industry is leaning hard into the whole “goods-as-a-service” concept and is eager to charge customers for features via numerous subscription schemes. The vehicle is becoming less important than how companies can use it to package services in a way that’s the most financially lucrative. That means full-time connectivity will be essential on vehicles like the Urbansphere with the manufacturer having more control over the car than the person whose garage it lives in.

Automakers have loads of industry-sanctioned euphemisms for making vehicles more like smartphones and less like traditional automobiles and Audi utilized several in its press release (e.g. e-mobility). But the ultimate goal remains the same, regardless of the terminology: Leveraging internet connectivity to harvest customer data which can then be sold and recycled to create targeted marketing to stream right back into the vehicle. This also highlights the true value of autonomy — a totally captive audience.

As for the Urbansphere. It’s another autonomous luxury concept with suicide doors and two rows of seats that can be made to face each other. Despite there being oodles of room, occupancy is limited to four individuals to maximize legroom. Those not interested in socializing can bring down a privacy screen that isolates the person’s eyes and ears from the rest of the cabin. The back seats also come with the kind of adjustments one would expect on a La-Z-Boy recliner, including an entertainment mode for when passengers want to watch something collaboratively on the retractable, transparent, OLED screen that drops from the glass ceiling (or the individual screens embedded in the front headrests).

There’s a water dispenser that comes with its own cups, a swiveling center console, fun exterior lighting displays (including a red-carpet mode), and the obligatory retractable steering wheel and pedals. The opulence is overkill. But it does showcase what can be done with modern technologies, assuming autonomous driving manages to join them. It’s just unfortunate that so many of the good ideas are being undermined by invasive technologies you frankly couldn’t pay me to have installed on my car.

The most glaring example was Audi proudly proclaiming that the concept qualifies as a “wellness zone” due to some of the “innovative digital options that emerged in no small part through input from the co-creation process with Chinese customers.” This includes an adaptive program that uses facial scans and voice analysis to determine how passengers are feeling in real-time. Audi framed this as “stress detection” and said the system offers personalized suggestions for relaxation via meditation apps or other features linked to the various screens found in the vehicle. Though it has to be said that China’s growing number of traffic enforcement data centers have been wanting automakers to implement full-time monitoring of vehicle occupants for some time — making the concept a bit of a trojan horse.

[Images: Audi]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 12 comments
  • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Apr 19, 2022

    Just when I thought I’ve seen the greatest extent of bovine excrement in the guise of marketing material..there’s this!

    • RHD RHD on Apr 21, 2022

      Automakers are giving up on self-driving cars and will now turn their creative expertise to creating flying cars. The future is just around the corner! What could possibly go wrong?

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Apr 19, 2022

    "How am I doing today, Alexa?"

  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
  • Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
Next