Porsche Becoming Volume Brand

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While it may not be on the cusp of supplanting Toyota in terms of sales, the Porsche brand has enjoyed relatively consistent growth since 2009. Despite 2020 representing a poor sales year for just about everyone who wasn’t producing vaccines, the German manufacturer weathered the storm better than most and came back to break a few records the following year.

By the end of 2021, Porsche had sold nearly 302,000 vehicles globally. It also managed to break its previous sales records in China and the United States. Considering that global production volumes have remained suppressed by supply chain problems, it was an impressive accomplishment. However, Detlev von Platen, Executive Board Member Sales & Marketing at Porsche AG, believes the automaker can still outdo itself in 2022.

Speaking with Automobilwoche, von Platen indicated the 40,000-person company would be seeking to hire another 400 pairs of hands to help with elevated demand. With the right kind of people and a little luck, he suggested this year could be the best the company has ever had. But, even if the stars fail to align perfectly, von Platen isn’t worried about volume.

“When I look at the current orders, I’m confident for 2022. Growth in sales could reach a similarly high level this year as in 2021,” he told the outlet, adding that wait times certain on models had reached 12 months.

Porsche spent decades as a low-volume automaker specializing in high-performance vehicles. But it has historically made attempts to improve its volume, often resulting in short-term successes that foreshadow an evaporating market share.

It’s been a while since we’ve seen a collapse. Minus the previous recession, sailing has been relatively smooth ever since the automaker launched the Porsche Cayenne in 2002. The company has since moved into manufacturing fewer sports coupes to focus on the Panamera sedan and Macan crossover, both of which outsell the iconic 911 by huge margins. Though it would be a lie to suggest that deliveries of the brand’s two-door options were poor.

Porsche’s quest for volume has also been helped by its merger with Volkswagen, which offered access to its vast manufacturing capabilities and technology borrowed from the Audi brand. In fact, Porsche’s best-selling model (the Macan) shares a platform with the Audi Q5 while the larger Cayenne overlaps with the Q7.

But the company has committed itself, along with the rest of Volkswagen Group, to swiftly transition into selling EVs. While this remains a dangerous proposal if those products fail to deliver, sales of the Porsche Taycan doubled in 2021 (vs 2020) and now rival 911 volumes in markets where they’re sold together. The automaker is planning to launch an electrified Macan in 2023, followed by battery-powered versions of the 718 Boxster and Cayman.

But it remains to be seen if the adoption rate of EVs will keep pace with Porsche’s plan to implement them. Despite the electric segment enjoying some healthy growth of its own, EVs still only represent 3 percent of the total market. With Porsche having grown quite a bit over the last two decades and plans to dive headlong back into motorsport, it needs to figure out how to sell alternative-energy vehicles without nuking volume or alienating its customer base in the short term.

[Image: Tishomir/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Feb 09, 2022

    An electric Macan, if they give it decent range, will cost over $100K. It's hard to get excited about cars in that price range.

  • Bullnuke Bullnuke on Feb 09, 2022

    In 1971 I was perusing the brochure for 911s at the Porsche dealership in Salt Lake City. One of the pages in the brochure depicted the hand-crafted care in building "your new 911" with a car on a rotisserie having undercoating brush-applied by a white coated technician at their factory. These days that factory must have a large number of brush-toting undercoating robots working on a ferris wheel of rotisseries to deal with being a volume brand. What a world. EDIT: I ended up passing on the 911 and purchased a '68 912. I wonder if 912s were hand-crafted and brush coated?

  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next