Cheap Electronics: 2020 Mini Cooper SE Pricing Announced

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Our big concern for Mini’s upcoming electric hatchback was that it wouldn’t have sufficient range to make sense in the United States. The company seemed to be more interested in producing a rambunctious urban runabout, rather than something that could serve as a do-anything, go-anywhere EV. But we figured we’d wait to see where BMW Group planned on pricing the thing before folding arms and furrowing brows.

As it turns out, the Mini Cooper SE’s starting MSRP will be $30,750 (including destination). While that undercuts the cost of some “rival” models by several grand, the Mini EV brings less to the party.

The front-wheel-drive SE makes 181 horsepower and 199 lb-ft of torque, pulling the entirety of that energy from a 32.6-kWh battery pack. Zero to 60 takes a relatively brisk 6.9 seconds and the car tops out at 93 mph. Recharge times are said to be an enviable four hours, using a 7.4 kW home AC charging port, with fast-charge stations returning 80 percent of the vehicle’s maximum range in just 35 minutes.

Our own Environmental Protection Agency usually tamps down Europe’s WLTP testing-cycle estimates, meaning the 146-mile range Mini has promised for the SE will likely come down a bit when the car goes on sale in the United States. Nissan’s base Leaf is priced within a few bucks of the electric Mini and comes with a larger 40 kW battery pack that’s guaranteed to deliver more miles per charge.

While that makes it look like an easy victory for the Leaf, and every other EV offering superior range for a few thousand extra dollars (Tesla Model 3, Chevrolet Bolt, etc.), Mini believes the brand’s fun factor and upscale appeal will help see it through. It’s acceleration could be trumped by a Leaf Plus… but the handling should be a lock. BMW Group has suggested the Mini Cooper SE has retained the gas-driven Hardtop’s nimble demeanor — making it ideal around town, where its diminished range will be less of an issue. The manufacturer also said it views the smaller battery as an opportunity to save weight. But we would liked to have seen something larger and more practical, consequences be damned.

New standard features include a smartphone app that allows you to control the vehicle’s climate settings from afar, new 5.5-inch digital gauge display (above), heated front seats, and a driver assistance suite the company plans on explaining in greater detail closer to its American launch.

We’ll see how receptive the public is next year. Expect to see the 2020 Mini Cooper SE going on sale in March.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Oct 28, 2019

    This will be an interesting test case. The 80-mile crop of compliance cars like the original Leaf, e-Golf, Focus Electric, etc. clearly didn't have enough range even to be a useful second car for many people. But I think this is enough range for a second car, and it's usefully cheaper than long-range EVs. It should also be eligible for a tax credit that will make its net price $25k or so for well-heeled buyers. I suspect it might sell decently, taking into account the malaise that's affecting the Mini brand overall since the cars turned into restyled 1-series.

  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Oct 29, 2019

    I support their choice of a smaller, lighter battery to retain some semblance of handling characteristics. As a commuter car, it would likely suffice to plug into a standard outlet every day or every other day. I like the styling and retro interior of the Mini, though I would have preferred a sub 6 second 0-60.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next