Turbocharged 2.5-liter Appears in Japanese-market Mazda CX-5

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

According to California Air Resources Board (CARB) certification documents, the Japanese won’t be the only ones enjoying the gutsy turbo 2.5-liter that just landed in that country’s CX-5 crossover. The hotter inline-four would be just the thing to bring additional customers to Mazda’s best-selling model, and it seems the automaker’s U.S. arm has done the groundwork for a potential launch.

Getting the kids to daycare faster is nice, but the changes coming to Japan’s CX-5 aren’t solely about horsepower.

Of course, it’s still worth touching on. The Skyactiv-G 2.5T engine is already available in the U.S.-market CX-9 and as an upgrade in the Mazda 6, but this is the first application of the engine in Japan. Odd that they’re getting it first. From its well-aspirated innards comes 250 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque — a very healthy upgrade from the current 2.0-liter CX-5’s 156 hp and 150 lb-ft, as well as the 2.5-liter’s 187 hp and 186 lb-ft.

The CX-5 is universally regarded as the practical, mass-market crossover to own if you’re at all a driving aficionado. Mazda’s compact CUV earns high marks for its handling and looks, but not that many accolades for its power.

With the updates coming to Japan’s CX-5, Mazda covers both bases. In addition to the new engine, the automaker has added an upgraded torque vectoring system named G-Vectoring Control Plus. Besides tinkering with the torque sent to each wheel, GVC Plus adds braking to the stability system’s functions.

From Mazda:

GVC Plus uses the brakes to add direct yaw moment control for further enhanced handling stability. As the driver steers out of a corner by returning the steering wheel to the center position, GVC Plus applies a light braking force to the outer wheels, providing a stabilizing moment that helps restore the vehicle to straight line running. The system realizes consistently smooth transitions between yaw, roll and pitch even under high cornering forces, improving the vehicle’s ability to accurately track sudden steering inputs and crisply exit corners

To say the CX-5 is Mazda’s most important vehicle would be an understatement. In the U.S., sales of the CX-5 are more than double that of the next best-selling model (the 3 sedan and hatch). Over the first nine months of 2018, the CUV’s volume rose 26.1 percent, outselling the other model by 65,432 units.

[Image: Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Juehoe Juehoe on Oct 11, 2018

    There is no lack of power with the 2.2 Turbo Diesel - which is not available in all markets. We (living in Thailand) drive the CX-5 Diesel versions since it's introduction. It is the car with most power in the market - far more powerful than the Honda CR-V. European brands are also available - but they are twice as expensive because of the import taxes and fees. But I will probably change to the new 2.5 l Turbo - depending on price, features and fuel economy.

  • Roadscholar Roadscholar on Oct 12, 2018

    I used to be a manuals-only guy. After two Evo SST's and a WRX auto I'm done with manuals. Even the M2 I drove this week would have been more fun with a dual-clutch auto.

  • EngineerfromBaja_1990 A friend from college had its twin (2003 Cavalier 2dr) which fittingly re-named the Cacalier. No description needed
  • Lorenzo GM is getting out of the car biz, selling only trucks, EVs and the Corvette. They're chasing the bigger margins on lower volume, like the dealer trying to sell a car for $1 million: "I just have to sell one!"
  • SCE to AUX "The closeness of the two sides"56-44 isn't close, if that's what you mean.
  • Jalop1991 expensive repairs??? I've heard that EVs don't require anything that resembles maintenance or repair!So let me get this straight: as EV design and manufacture technology, and as battery technology, improves over time, the early adopters will suffer from having older and ever-rapidly outdated cars that as a result have lower resale value than they thought.And it's the world's obligation to brush their tears away and give them money back as they realize the horrible mistake they made, the mistake made out of some strong desire to signal their virtue, the mistake they could have avoided by--you know--calmly considering the facts up front?Really? It's Tesla's obligation here?If Tesla continued to manufacture the Model 3 (for example) the same way it did originally when the Model 3 was introduced, Tesla would not have been able to lower prices. And they wouldn't have. But they invested heavily in engineering in order to bring prices down--and now the snowflakes are crying in their cereal that the world didn't accommodate their unicorn dreams and wishes and wants and desires.Curse the real world! How dare it interfere with those unicorn wishes!
  • Canam23 I live in southwest France and I am always surprised at how many Teslas I see on the road here. Mind you, I live in a town of 50k people, not a big city so it does seem unusual. On the other hand I also see a lot of PT Cruisers here (with diesel engines) so there's that...
Next