Hyundai Motor America Looking for Another CEO

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After barely a year in the biggest office at Hyundai Motor America, CEO Kyung Soo Lee has returned to South Korea, leaving the automaker’s American arm looking for a new boss. Lee served as an interim leader after Hyundai sacked former CEO Dave Zuchowski in December 2016, taking on the top spot last September.

The CEO search comes as Hyundai attempts to reverse falling sales in the United States with a product offensive. There’s also a engine fire problem the feds want Hyundai to answer to.

According to a Hyundai spokesperson, there’s no named replacement. The former CEO will serve as an advisor to the company after returning to the automaker’s home base. One thing’s for sure — Lee won’t have to appear before the Senate Commerce Committee on November 14th alongside a representative from the automaker’s Kia sister division.

In late June, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration launched an investigation into non-collision fires in certain Hyundai and Kia models. Safety groups have called for a massive recall of 3 million vehicles from the 2011 to 2014 model years. At this point, neither Hyundai nor Kia have agreed to appear before the committee.

After being caught off guard by the crossover wave sweeping the American populace, Hyundai unveiled a product plan flush with the high-riding vehicles. No longer able to count on Elantras, Accents, and Sonatas for American volume, the automaker introduced the Kona subcompact crossover earlier this year, following it up with a larger Santa Fe as a replacement for the Santa Fe Sport. The old Santa Fe, renamed the Santa Fe XL, disappears next year, replaced by a brawnier vehicle that’ll probably carry the Palisade name. There’s also a slightly refreshed Tucson appearing for the 2019 model year.

While Lee’s departure from HMA was the top Hyundai headline in the U.S. on Monday, it wasn’t the only news making ripples. The automaker announced Monday that it will create two new business units — one focused on mobility and emerging technologies, the other on hydrogen fuel cell vehicle development.

[Source: Automotive News Europe] [Image: Hyundai]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
 5 comments
  • Salmonmigration Salmonmigration on Oct 29, 2018

    "The automaker announced Monday that it will create two new business units — one focused on mobility and emerging technologies, the other on hydrogen fuel cell vehicle development." They have built two new altars on which to sacrifice virgin dollars and won. Hoping to appease the gods of "market forces".

  • Xtoyota Xtoyota on Oct 29, 2018

    Hyundai needs to improve their gas mileage numbers. Toyota and Honda cars and SUV's are much better. New 2019 Santa Fe AWD gets 24 mpg .... new Rav4 and CRV are in the 30+mpg

    • See 2 previous
    • Bd2 Bd2 on Oct 30, 2018

      The Santa Fe competes against other "tweeners" like the Murano and Edge. Honda will be entering the segment with the revived Passport nameplate. And really depends on model and powertrain. For instance, CR observed combined 33 MPG for the Fit EX, Rio S and Accent SEL; and 32 MPG for the Yaris LE. CR also CR observed 33 MPG for the Elantra SE and Forte LX (note: the new Forte w/ the iVT gets better fuel economy) whereas the Corolla LE Plus and Civic LX get a combined 32 MPG. Where H/K fall behind is w/ the Sonata and Optima (2.4L) - combined 28 MPG while the Camry LE gets 32 MPG and the Accord EX (1.5T) gets 31 MPG. But both Toyota and Honda recently updated their powertrains. The 2.4L and 2.0T in the Sonata and Optima are at the end of the their life-cycle and will soon be replaced by a new (more powerful and efficient) 2.5L and 2.5T. H/K likely will stick to the 8 spd AT on the next Sonata and Optima instead of going w/ a CVT like much of the competition. The Sonata also is currently available w/ the 1.6T and DCT combo which is very fuel efficient.

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next