Mazda USA Senior VP Robert Davis 'Reassigned' After A Rough 2016

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Mazda’s U.S. senior vice president for operations has been reassigned to a role in special assignments.

It does not appear to be a promotion.

Robert Davis, who held the position for more than half a decade, will no longer oversee all operations but will rather “lead teams in the ever-growing areas of recall compliance and cybersecurity, ” as well as legislation, regulations, and compliance.

Preaching patience, Mazda’s North American CEO Masahiro Moro revealed just last summer that, “ it will take Mazda two complete generations of new vehicles to fully transform itself.”

Patience may have waned, however, as the U.S. auto industry surged to an all-time record sales high in 2016 and Mazda volume tumbled 7 percent, driving the brand’s market share down to just 1.7 percent.

That was no way to successfully follow-up 2015’s performance, when Davis-led Mazda USA grew volume to a 21-year high.

2016 certainly had potential for Mazda, with a new MX-5 Miata picking up steam, a highly regarded replacement for the CX-9 after the first-generation was allowed to linger for nearly a decade, and a full calendar year for the new CX-3.

But the MX-5 is a niche player. The CX-9‘s ramp-up has been slow; only twice did Mazda report more than 2,000 monthly CX-9 sales in 2016, a feat the automaker accomplished six times with the thoroughly outdated first-gen CX-9 in 2013. And the CX-3, despite explosive growth in the subcompact crossover segment, hasn’t caught fire.

The bigger problem, of course, is that Mazda’s car sales plunged. While the symptoms are similar across the market, industry-wide volume was down 9 percent. Mazda’s already-small car lineup slid 14 percent compared with 2015. The Mazda 3 and Mazda 6 combined to lose nearly 25,000 sales.

Added to the 53-year-old Davis’s new role will be the coaching of a next generation of executives. Masahiro Moro said these changes are occurring so Mazda can “seize more than our fair share of this market shift,” and “to mentor new leaders and give those leaders a chance to play a part in the next chapter of the company’s success in the U.S.”

Moro says he will be “leaning heavily on Robert Davis to tap into his nearly 30 years of Mazda experience.”

Meanwhile, Mazda’s Ron Stettner, who was the vice president for sales and retail operations, has left the company. His replacement is Tom Donnelly. All of the changes are effective immediately.

A replacement for Robert Davis has not yet been announced.

When Davis was installed in as senior vice president for U.S. operations, Mazda’s then-North American CEO Jim O’Sullivan, said the organization was being reshaped “to fully realize Mazda’s U.S. growth potential in the next few years.”

O’Sullivan retired at the end of 2015.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • Jthorner Jthorner on Jan 27, 2017

    Give it up Mazda. Focus your energies on markets where you have a chance. You gave it the good fight in the USA for a long time, but you are now largely irrelevant. The rise of Hyundai/Kia and the resurgence of US based brands made second and third tier Japanese brands irrelevant. You are in the company of Isuzu and Mitsubishi now. Toyota, Honda and Nissan more than cover your market segment. Subaru successfully created a large niche brand of its own by being steadfastly different: boxer engines and all wheel drive for everything.

  • Ricky Spanish Ricky Spanish on Jan 27, 2017

    Great product doesn't matter if pricing is out of whack with the market, especially the lower end of the market.

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next