Junkyard Find: 1973 Buick Century Gran Sport

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

After writing about more than 2,000 discarded vehicles during the past 13 years, I haven’t found many legitimate machines from the Golden Age of the Detroit Muscle Car. I believe this era started with John DeLorean’s brilliant marketing of the 1964 Pontiac GTO and ended at some point during the 1972-1974 period, depending on how many beers you’ve consumed before beginning the debate about the edge-case vehicles.

Today’s car meets most of the requirements: a GM A-Body coupe with spiffy graphics, a thirsty big-inch V8 engine, and school-of-hard-knocks small chrome bumpers.

Even the most tedious car fanatic agrees that the Buick Skylark Gran Sport, built for the 1965 through 1972 model years, qualifies as an A-list Golden Age Muscle Car, particularly when you’re talking about the ridiculously powerful GSXs. When GM stopped using the Skylark name after 1972, the old Century name got dusted off and applied to the Skylark’s A-Body platform. Naturally, the Skylark Gran Sport became the Century Gran Sport that year.

You could get the ’73 Century Gran Sport with a 350 cubic-inch (5.7-liter) Buick V8 rated at 190 horsepower, a 455 cubic-inch (7.5-liter) Buick V8 rated at 225 horsepower, or a wilder 455 with 270 horses. This appears to be a 455, though it could also be a 400 or 430 that got swapped in. Keep in mind that while those horsepower numbers seem low (compared to the inflated gross power numbers of earlier years, as well as to the very powerful engines of the present day), all of the 1973 Buick 455s made high-300s torque numbers and moved the just-under-two-tons Century pretty well.

This car sat outdoors with the windows down (or busted out) for decades, and probably ceased being worth restoring before the 1980s were through. Still, some car lot tried — and failed — to move this iron for $999.

I found this car last winter in the San Jose yard with one of the best taco trucks in the San Francisco Bay Area. While California cars tend to avoid cancerous rust, they don’t fare so well when they bake in the sun every summer and fill up with rain every winter.

Corrosion like this isn’t so hard to repair, of course, but the return on your investment would be much higher if you started with a 1965-1970 Skylark GS.

I could tell at a glance that this clock would be frozen solid inside, so I didn’t buy it for my collection. I have the Cadillac version already, anyway.

With Accu-Drive like the big Buicks and time-modulated choke (whatever that is). Buick borrowed the “Luxus” trim level name from Opel that year… which ended badly for sellers of big, gas-swilling machines thanks to certain geopolitical events beyond the control of Detroit.

The 1973 Buicks looked good, so buying one sight unseen wasn’t complete madness.

For links to all the other Junkyard Finds, visit the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Namesakeone Namesakeone on Aug 14, 2020

    I wonder if those one-year-only taillights would be worth something. If they're not pitted beyond redemption. If they weren't crushed with the car by now.

  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Aug 14, 2020

    I liked the pontiac version. My parents didn't have a Grand Am, they had the Grand Prix. Same 455, I think, and the local mechanic would lean it out before the state inspection....we'd barely make it, stalling in traffic, nothing off the line, pass, go back, screws turned out, car ran endless torque....

  • Billyboy The Big Three, or what used to be the Big Three, have been building sedans in the FWD unibody mold since the 80’s to compete with the Japanese - and failing. The Taurus was the only decent attempt, and even that fizzled out after a few years. Back to GM, There’s no reason to choose a Malibu over a Camry or Accord for normal buyers. The story was the same when it was the Citation, Celebrity, Lumina, and Impala, as it was the same with Ford and Chrysler. GM knows this, as does Ford, and doesn’t care - and rightfully so. Better to cede this time-worn commodity segment to others and focus to where the market has shifted.
  • CanadaCraig You are not wrong. Or a dummy for that matter. I also think it's foolish of GM to kill off the Malibu. That said... I think there needs to be full-sized plain jane sedans for sale. And there are none. And haven't been for a long time. A basic BIG car. With room for six. Bench seat and all. Nothing fancy. And a low price to go along with it. I would buy one.
  • OCcarguy Back in the 1980s the Mitsubishi Cordia was one of my favorite cars. I would love to see them make cars we could get excited about again.
  • Chris I dislike SUVs. I think they are clunky looking and not much in the handling department. I'll take an Audi A4 or BMw three series or even a VW Jetta over any SUV. It I need more interior room for a shot time, I'll rent something bigger.
  • Amwhalbi I have a sedan and an SUV, and for pure driving and riding enjoyment, I'll pick my sedan every time. But yes, SUV's are generally more practical for all around usage, particularly if you have only one vehicle. So I think the perfect answer is the sedan hatchback (a la the last Buick Regal) which can still yield the drive and ride or a sedan, yet provide a greater modicum of practical, accessible cargo capacity. Most of the sedans made could (with minor styling changes) easily become 4 door hatchbacks. Oh, yeah, I forgot - Americans don't like hatchbacks, even if they do in Europe...
Next