Stuff We Use: Smoked Side Markers

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

On our never-ending quest to improve this place by listening to feedback from the B&B, we are taking a new tack with these product posts, choosing instead to focus on items we use and have purchased with our own meager income. After all, if we’re giving you the truth about cars, we ought to give you the truth about car accessories.


This one’s a little bit different than some of the other Stuff We Use missives which pass through our domain name twice a month. Instead of a universal product like battery boosters or jack stands, we’ll walk ya through the installation of an accessory placed on one of our cars just the other week.


Styling is a perpetually subjective thing, with some of us preferring a completely standard look to our hoopties while others enjoy something that’s just a little bit different than what’s available on the showroom floor. The writer is definitely in the latter camp, though only to a point. You won’t find stick-on chrome from Manny, Moe, & Jack on any of my whips, nor will the make or model be emblazoned on the windshield in foot-high stickers. If something I’ve added (or removed) from my car makes onlookers question if it rolled out of the factory that way, all the better.

First, a dose of history. Back in 1968, federal regulators decreed that new cars on our nation’s roads must abide by a new requirement for side-marker lights, appearing as amber colored lamps up front and red ones for the rear. This caused consternation in design studios, since adding these markers to some cars of the day was akin to taking a Sharpie to the Mona Lisa. Ok, that’s being a bit dramatic – but the point stands.


Some brands tried to stick it to The Man by only adhering to the letter of the law, begrudgingly placing the tiniest of amber/red side markers on their cars. The 1968 Dodge Charger is a perfect example of this thumb-in-the-eye to government. Still, someone in Washington must have twisted some arms (or at least defined a minimum number of square inches for side markers) because check out the amber/red honkers on the Charger just one model year later.

These days, modern LED technology makes it easy to incorporate these federally mandated units into a car’s design, with creative ideas cropping up like kudzu. Some modern machines, like the post-facelift Dodge Charger, did a respectable job of incorporating the illumination into its styling cues by having them trace the outline of front and rear wheel arches. But yer author’s five-year-old Dodge Challenger never received such a treatment, leaving what amounts to a set of amber and yellow popsicle sticks glued to the side of his car.


Enter the smoked lenses cribbed off the internet. Available from common sources like Amazon or eBay Motors, these things are intended to rid my car of the side marker scourge and blend in much more seamlessly with the Pitch Black paintwork. They arrived decently quickly through regular mail, showing up in a box that had been wrapped several times in plastic to discourage theft, a sadly prevalent occurrence in your humble author’s experience with envelopes arriving ripped asunder and magazines shredded beyond readability. This is not an issue with couriers in our area.

Anyway, installing these lights couldn’t have been easier. Gone are the days of my father’s 1978 Blazer whose side markers were affixed with exposed silver Phillips head screws, replaced with far more discreet clips on the lights’ anterior sides. Simply sliding under the Challenger was enough to find the clips for its rear lights, requiring an easy push on its fore fastener which permitted the rear fastener to slide right out. All that remained was unplugging the light from its factory harness, a task slightly easier said than done thanks to five years of accumulated road grime.

With the factory light removed, installation – as they used to say in Chilton’s manuals – was reverse of the removal. Not s single tool was required to make this upgrade, a delight in this modern age where some cars require the disassembly of their front fascias in order to replace a headlight bulb. The aftermarket lamp appears completely black when off, shining a bright red when illuminated. We’ve all seen aftermarket LED stuff go dim after a few months of use, so I’ll be keeping an eye on these things for any shenanigans. All’s well so far.


Up front on the Challenger, removal of the factory lights was equally simple – on the passenger side. Reaching down through the engine compartment to that side’s lamp and pushing out the fasteners was as easy as it was on the car’s aft quarters, but the driver side required removing the cone air filter and sticking my arm down through the intake box. This took but a moment of logical thought, though I am confident there are ample numbers of YouTube tutorials on this topic. The fasteners on this final lamp were easy to manipulate once I snaked my arm down through the intake and around to the back of its front fender.

So far, I give this upgrade full marks for ease of installation and satisfaction with results. Take that, regulators of 1968!

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 10 comments
  • JMII JMII on Apr 25, 2024

    I did them on my C7 because somehow GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. These are brighter then OEM despite the smoke tint look.



    I got them here: https://www.corvettepartsandaccessories.com/products/c7-corvette-oracle-concept-sidemarker-set?variant=1401801736202

    • Redapple2 Redapple2 on Apr 26, 2024

      ..................GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. 1) GM is spelled gm. (they think little of themselves.) 2) Corvette is one of the very few - good ones. The rest is vile rubbish. IE- Silverado is widely considered 4th best truck. (or near the bottom) Wise people would ask -- why near the worst in pickups?. I mean pick up sales + Tahoe, they must be making more than 2x as many as Ford of the super profitable trucks at $20,000 profit each. You d think they have enough $ left over to design a decent pick up. BINGO !!! They think their customers are stupid. It s a Rotted company. Evil gm Vampire.



  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Apr 26, 2024

    Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.

  • NJRide My mom had the 2005 Ford 500. The sitting higher appealed to her coming out of SUVs and vans (this was sort of during a flattening of the move to non-traditional cars) It was packaged well, more room than 90s Taurus/GM H-Bodies for sure. I do remember the CVT was a little buzzy. I wonder if these would have done better if gas hadn't spiked these and the Chrysler 300 seemed to want to revive US full-size sedans. Wonder what percent of these are still on the road.
  • 28-Cars-Later Mileage of 29/32/30 is pretty pitiful given the price point and powertrain sorcery to be a "hybrid". What exactly is this supposed to be?
  • MRF 95 T-Bird I own a 2018 Challenger GT awd in the same slate gray color. Paid $28k for it in late 2019 as a leftover on the lot. It’s probably worth $23k today which is roughly what this 2015 RT should be going for.
  • Mike978 There is trouble recruiting police because they know they won’t get support from local (Democratic) mayors if the arrests are on favored groups.
  • FreedMike I'm sure that someone in the U.S. commerce department during the 1950s said, "you know, that whole computer thing is gonna be big, and some country is going to cash in...might as well be us. How do we kick start this?" Thus began billions of taxpayer dollars being spent to develop computers, and then the Internet. And - voila! - now we have a world-leading computer industry that's generated untold trillions of dollars of value for the the good old US of A. Would "the market" have eventually developed it? Of course. The question is how much later it would have done so and how much lead time (and capital) we would have ceded to other countries. We can do the same for alternative energy, electric vehicles, and fusion power. That stuff is all coming, it's going to be huge, and someone's gonna cash in. If it's not us, you can damn well bet it'll be China or the EU (and don't count out India). If that's not what you want, then stop grumbling about the big bad gubmint spending money on all that stuff (and no doubt doing said grumbling on the computer and the Internet that were developed in the first place because the big bad gubmint spent money to develop them).
Next