Ford Reaches Tentative Deal With UAW, Workers Return

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Striking Ford employees are heading back to the assembly line today after the United Auto Workers (UAW) union reached a tentative labor deal with the company late on Wednesday. While the agreement has yet to be ratified by union members and all details have yet to be made public, we know it includes a 25 percent wage hike over the life of the four-year contract, improved benefits, and the elimination of some of the tiered wages the union had been fighting against.


Say whatever you want about Ford. But this makes the brand look exceptionally good to the general public. Despite not having the best financial portfolio of the Detroit automakers, the Blue Oval was consistently offering the union the sweetest deals and can now take credit for being the company that finally paid up in hopes of ending the strike.


“For months we’ve said that record profits mean record contracts. And UAW family, our Stand Up Strike has delivered. What started at three plants at midnight on September 15, has become a national movement,” stated UAW President Shawn Fain. “We won things nobody thought possible. Since the strike began, Ford put 50 [percent] more on the table than when we walked out. This agreement sets us on a new path to make things right at Ford, at the Big Three, and across the auto industry. Together, we are turning the tide for the working class in this country.”


Time will tell whether or not the deal works for Ford in the long term. However, the short-term benefits provide the company with an opportunity to claim it cares more about the domestic workforce than its rivals. It also gets to reactivate stalled assembly lines while General Motors and Stellantis continue contract negotiations with the UAW.


Meanwhile, the union gets to do some bragging of its own and made sure to do so in a press release issued Wednesday evening:


The gains in the deal, as outlined by Fain and [UAW Vice President Chuck Browning], are valued at more than four times the gains from the 2019 contract, and provide more in base wage increases than Ford workers have received in the past 22 years. The agreement grants 25 [percent] in base wage increases through April 2028, and will cumulatively raise the top wage by over 30 [percent] to more than $40 an hour, and raise the starting wage by 68 [percent], to over $28 an hour.
The lowest-paid workers at Ford will see a raise of more than 150 [percent] over the life of the agreement, with some workers receiving an immediate 85 [percent] increase immediately upon ratification.
The agreement reinstates major benefits lost during the Great Recession, including Cost-of-Living Allowances and a three-year Wage Progression, as well as killing divisive wage tiers in the union. It improves retirement for current retirees, those workers with pensions, and those who have 401(k) plans. It also includes a historic right to strike over plant closures, a first for the union.


President Fain has frequently been accused of showboating and trying to create a spectacle by his opponents. But the strategy seems to have worked rather well for the union and comes at a time when some members were starting to get antsy about the ramifications of a strike that extended into November. There was a push from within the union to vote on at least one of the deals proposed by the industry going into this week and it appears those members have gotten their wish.


There will also undoubtedly be reports discussing how far away this is from the 40 percent wage increase over four years the union had originally demanded. However, that target was clearly chosen to highlight industry disparities in executive pay. The UAW presumably understood matching the recent pay bumps issued to upper management would have been unsustainable and chose the number as a way to force everyone into talking about the widening disparities in compensation. It also happened to give contract negotiations a lot of overhead.


Compared to previous contract negotiations, the above represents a major victory for the UAW. For all the grandstanding Fain has been accused of, the guy appears to have delivered a major victory for the union.


We’ll see how things play out for Ford. While increased worker pay may encourage automakers to continue offshoring jobs, there’s not a survey in history showing Americans actually support the concept. Gallup polls dating back to 2007 show that roughly 80 percent of the country feels that outsourcing is bad for the U.S. economy and Ford already likes to promote itself as “the most American of all car companies.”


The contract deal represents a golden opportunity for Blue Oval to underline that statement and apply pressure to General Motors and Stellantis. They’ll now have to take on the UAW without a third party shouldering some of the burden.


"We are pleased to have reached a tentative agreement on a new labor contract with the UAW covering our U.S. operations," Ford CEO and President Jim Farley said in a statement.


[Image: UAW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 61 comments
  • Analoggrotto Analoggrotto on Oct 27, 2023

    Goddess Mary Barra is going to teach UAW a lesson.

    • See 2 previous
    • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Oct 28, 2023

      Such Decorum from Jeff!


  • Bullnuke Bullnuke on Oct 29, 2023

    The UAW needed Red Robbo to get that 46%

  • 3-On-The-Tree Old news if it is even true. But from m my time as Firefighter/EMT fighting vehicle fires when it catches fire it is very toxic.
  • Akear Chinese cars simply do not have the quality of their Japanese and Korean counterparts. Remember, there are also tariffs on Chinese cars.
  • 3-On-The-Tree My experience with turbos is that they don’t give good mpg.
  • GregLocock They will unless you don't let them. Every car manufacturing country around the world protects their local manufacturers by a mixture of legal and quasi legal measures. The exception was Australia which used to be able to design and manufacture every component in a car (slight exaggeration) and did so for many years protected by local design rules and enormous tariffs. In a fit of ideological purity the tariffs were removed and the industry went down the plughole, as predicted. This was followed by the precision machine shops who made the tooling, and then the aircraft maintenance business went because the machine shops were closed. Also of course many of the other suppliers closed.The Chinese have the following advantagesSlave laborCheap electricityZero respect for IPLong term planning
  • MaintenanceCosts Yes, and our response is making it worse.In the rest of the world, all legacy brands are soon going to be what Volvo is today: a friendly Western name on products built more cheaply in China or in companies that are competing with China from the bottom on the cost side (Vietnam, India, etc.) This is already more or less the case in the Chinese market, will soon be the case in other Asian markets, and is eventually coming to the EU market.We are going to try to resist in the US market with politicians' crack - that is, tariffs. Economists don't really disagree on tariffs anymore. Their effect is to depress overall economic activity while sharply raising consumer prices in the tariff-imposing jurisdiction.The effect will be that we will mostly drive U.S.-built cars, but they will be inferior to those built in the rest of the world and will cost 3x-4x as much. Are you ready for your BMW X5 to be three versions old and cost $200k? Because on the current path that is what's coming. It may be overpriced crap that can't be sold in any other world market, but, hey, it was built in South Carolina.The right way to resist would be to try to form our own alliances with the low-cost producers, in which we open our markets to them while requiring adherence to basic labor and environmental standards. But Uncle Joe isn't quite ready to sign that kind of trade agreement, while the orange guy just wants to tell those countries to GFY and hitch up with China if they want a friend.
Next