Junkyard Find: 1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The branches of the Chrysler K-Car Family Tree are far too numerous to describe here, since so many different K-derived cars and minivans were built from the 1981 through 1995 model years for the North American market. One of the rarest types is the 1985-1989 Dodge Lancer, and I've found an example in a Silicon Valley self-service wrecking yard.

The Lancer was the Dodge-badged version of the Chrysler LeBaron GTS hatchback sedan, priced between the Aries and 600 sedans.

The Lancer name has plenty of Chrysler history. For 1961 and 1962, the Lancer name was used on Dodge-badged twins of the Plymouth Valiant (because the Dart name was being used on big Plymouth Fury siblings at the time).

Mitsubishi began using the Lancer name in 1973, and Lancers with Dodge Colt badges appeared in the United States for the 1977 model year. Prior to that, the Colt had been Galant-based. For the 2002 model year, Mitsubishi Lancers finally arrived on this side of the Pacific.

Though Mitsubishi engines were available in plenty of K-Cars and their relatives, all of the 1985-1989 Dodge Lancers came with Chrysler 2.2- or 2.5-liter straight-four power.

This car is a top-trim-level ES with the optional 2.2-liter turbocharged engine, rated at 146 horsepower and 170 pound-feet.

A lot of 1980s cars had phony hood vents, but this one really does deliver cold air to the engine.

You see?

A five-speed manual was base equipment, but this car has the optional three-speed automatic (of course).

The final odometer reading is impressive, getting close to the 300,000-mile mark.

The MSRP for this fine Sterling Heights machine?

The base price was $10,322, which is about $29,015 in 2023 dollars. The turbocharged engine cost $628 ($1,764 today) while the automatic transmission added $504 ($1,415 now).

The Lancers just can't be kept in the showroom, so strong is their sense of 1980s rebellion.

It is the performance sedan that will thrill you all the way to the redline, hold you to the dotted line, cover you down the line, and impress you with its bottom line.

8.6 percent financing or $500 cash back!

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Nov 07, 2023

    Surprised that the K-car that made it this long was a turbo. The most reliable engine in these was also the least powerful - the NA 2.2. (But the turbo 2.2 was still better than the Mitsu 2.6, an awful engine in every way.)

  • Carlos Munoz Carlos Munoz on Apr 10, 2024

    I'm lookinfor an 1985 Chrisler Lebaron or Lancer For Buy if some one have one For sale here is My mail carl6979@hotmail.com My phone Number : 442 270 6804 i'm from California.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh so what?? .. 7.5 billion is not even in the same hemisphere as the utterly stupid waste of money on semiconductor fabs to the tune of more than 100 billion for FABS that CANNOT COMPETE in a global economy and CANNOT MAKE THE US Independent from China or RUSSIA. we REQUIRE China for cpu grade silicon and RUSSIA/Ukraine for manufacturing NEON gas for cpus and gpus and other silicon based processors for cars, tvs, phones, cable boxes ETC... so even if we spend trillion $ .. we STILL have to ask china permission to buy the cpu grade silicon needed and then buy neon gas to process the wafers.. but we keep tossing intel/Taiwan tens of billions at a time like a bunch of idiots.Google > "mining-and-refining-pure-silicon-and-the-incredible-effort-it-takes-to-get-there" Google > "silicon production by country statista" Google > "low-on-gas-ukraine-invasion-chokes-supply-of-neon-needed-for-chipmaking"
  • ToolGuy Clearly many of you have not been listening to the podcast.
  • 1995 SC This seems a bit tonedeaf.
  • 1995 SC Well I guess that will be the final nail in the Mini EV's coffin here. It was already not especially competitive, had no range and was way overpriced for what you get, but I like to get stuff like that used and well depreciated on occcasion though I likely would have passed anyway due to the Chinese manufacture.
  • MKizzy If China-branded vehicles arrive on these shores filling the gaping hole of sizes, body styles, and price points largely abandoned by established automakers, they will immediately find an interested customer base among those low/middle income consumers whose parents were (un)happily puttering around in old Hyundai Excels and Yugo GVs. Personally, I do think BYD or another of their major automakers will eventually circumvent the tariffs by building in Mexico and sending vehicles north.
Next