Used Car of the Day: 1986 Mercedes-Benz 300E

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Today's UCOTD is a project car. This 1986 Mercedes-Benz 300E has a "good engine and transmission", according to the seller, but it's not clear what that means.

Furthermore, it doesn't look cosmetically good in the one photo of the exterior.


Generally, we like to run listings that are more detailed, and this one is pretty sparse. But it's Monday and we're easing back into the workweek -- and really, I picked this car because I know these Mercs always get attention among those who love weird cars from the '80s.

The only other pieces of info we have here are that the car has 145,000 miles and it's for sale by the original owner. Oh, and the price is a bargain at $799.

So click here to take a closer look. Perhaps you can get this ride into nicer shape.

[Images: Seller]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 49 comments
  • ChristianWimmer ChristianWimmer on Oct 23, 2023

    Had the same engine in my 1985 Mercedes 300SE W126. Smooth, powerful and surprisingly fuel efficient (if you drove normally you could get 9-10 L / 100 km) and of course powerful. If anything can be saved from this car it’s the engine and maybe the transmission - provided the owner didn’t mess with either.

    • Jeff Jeff on Oct 25, 2023

      145,000 miles is low mileage for one of these I bet that if it is not running it could be made to run and likely with not much effort. Wouldn't put a lot of money into restoring it but if it were driveable it might make a decent commuter vehicle or as a backup vehicle.


  • Stephen Stephen on Dec 14, 2023

    In 2009 I moved to Australia from Canada and feared making an amature mistake on the "wrong side" of the road, so I purchased a 1987 300E. RHD turned out to be a false fear and our family bought a new SUV but I kept the Benz as it ran and drove so well. I even took it wild boar hunting where it crossed streams. I sold it to my mechanic when I moved back, he dropped us at the airport with it. At 263k km, it was great. I have had a couple other newer Benz, but miss the 300E the most.

  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
  • Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars
Next