Ford Plans Affordable EV Models and Promises Profitability

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Ford hasn’t had the best luck with profitability on its electric vehicle business, but the automaker is not shying away from aiming at the cheaper end of the EV spectrum. CEO Jim Farley recently confirmed that the company would purse sub-$30,000 electric models with its next-generation product line, and said that its existing models would become better in the meantime.


Farley noted that company executives are aware of buyers’ desire for more affordable EVs, noting Ford’s recent price cuts on the Mustang Mach-E, which gave the SUV a striking sales bump. The automaker’s hybrid models are quite popular, however, driven to a large degree by its expansive fleet business.


Ford’s gas-vehicle business, particularly its trucks, continues to generate strong revenues, giving it an advantage over electric-only automakers like Tesla, which has reportedly wavered in its desire to create an affordable electric car. Despite its struggles with EV profitability, the company feels confident that its lower-cost models won’t push it further into the red, as Farley expressed his belief that Ford would figure things out in the next few years.


CEO optimism is nothing new, as it’s often the only thing propping up companies’ stock prices. Tesla CEO Elon Musk recently announced a robotaxi program that will debut in August but also noted that the company would focus on accelerating more affordable model development. At the same time, it’s unclear how Ford plans to reach profitability with cheaper vehicles, as it’s slowed investments in new factories and other related areas.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 58 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Apr 25, 2024

    I'd like to believe, I want to believe, having had good FoMoCo vehicles - my aunt's old 1956 Fairlane, 1963 Falcon, 1968 Montego - but if Jim Farley is saying it, I can't believe it. It's been said that he goes with whatever the last person he talked to suggested. That's not the kind of guy you want running a $180 billion dollar company.

  • V8-1 V8-1 on Apr 26, 2024

    Go hybrid and wait for Toyota to finish its hydrogen engine and generator/separator.

    • See 1 previous
    • Jalop1991 Jalop1991 on Apr 28, 2024

      Jesus, Vo5. You must be a hoot at parties.


  • MacTassos Bagpipes. And loud ones at that.Bagpipes for back up warning sounds.Bagpipes for horns.Bagpipes for yellow light warning alert and louder bagpipes for red light warnings.Bagpipes for drowsy driver alerts.Bagpipes for using your phone while driving.Bagpipes for following too close.Bagpipes for drifting out of your lane.Bagpipes for turning without signaling.Bagpipes for warning your lights are off when driving at night.Bagpipes for not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign.Bagpipes for seat belts not buckled.Bagpipes for leaving the iron on when going on vacation. I’ll ne’er make that mistake agin’.
  • TheEndlessEnigma I would mandate the elimination of all autonomous driving tech in automobiles. And specifically for GM....sorry....gm....I would mandate On Star be offered as an option only.Not quite the question you asked but.....you asked.
  • MaintenanceCosts There's not a lot of meat to this (or to an argument in the opposite direction) without some data comparing the respective frequency of "good" activations that prevent a collision and false alarms. The studies I see show between 25% and 40% reduction in rear-end crashes where AEB is installed, so we have one side of that equation, but there doesn't seem to be much if any data out there on the frequency of false activations, especially false activations that cause a collision.
  • Zerocred Automatic emergency braking scared the hell out of me. I was coming up on a line of stopped cars that the Jeep (Grand Cherokee) thought was too fast and it blared out an incredibly loud warbling sound while applying the brakes. I had the car under control and wasn’t in danger of hitting anything. It was one of those ‘wtf just happened’ moments.I like adaptive cruise control, the backup camera and the warning about approaching emergency vehicles. I’m ambivalent  about rear cross traffic alert and all the different tones if it thinks I’m too close to anything. I turned off lane keep assist, auto start-stop, emergency backup stop. The Jeep also has automatic parking (parallel and back in), which I’ve never used.
  • MaintenanceCosts Mandatory speed limiters.Flame away - I'm well aware this is the most unpopular opinion on the internet - but the overwhelming majority of the driving population has not proven itself even close to capable of managing unlimited vehicles, and it's time to start dealing with it.Three important mitigations have to be in place:(1) They give 10 mph grace on non-limited-access roads and 15-20 on limited-access roads. The goal is not exact compliance but stopping extreme speeding.(2) They work entirely locally, except for downloading speed limit data for large map segments (too large to identify with any precision where the driver is). Neither location nor speed data is ever uploaded.(3) They don't enforce on private property, only on public roadways. Race your track cars to your heart's content.
Next