American Idled: Jeep Halts Production of Cherokee at Belvidere

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

It appears to be the end of the road for Jeep Cherokee as we know it, with Stellantis pulling the plug on Belvidere Assembly with no publicly known plan for replacement product.


The last Cherokee rolled off the line earlier this week, appearing to be an Attitude Lux trim clad in Diamond Black paint. Save for a few hastily placed mini American flags (plus a Buy American sticker) and a piece of paper noting the plant’s total production, fanfare seems to have been minimal. Idling a plant is never a great time in the life of a company, but Stellantis surely could have done a bit more to recognize these line workers – especially if this ends up being the last vehicle to ever roll out of a 58-year-old factory. The person in this photo, for example, says they have been working at Belvidere for 26 years.

Over on an unofficial Facebook page for the Belvidere plant, there are no shortage of tribute posts not just to the Cherokee but to the facility itself. The whole thing reads like an obit to an elderly relative, lending credence to rumours that Stellantis may be shutting the place down for good – at least in terms of vehicle production. Since 1965, the plant has built over 11.7 million vehicles, starting with from Plymouth and Dodge models until a switch to Omnirizon front-drivers in the late ‘70s. It started cranking out Dynasty sedans and its cousins in 1987, Neons in 1994, then members of the Caliber/Compass/Patriot family about a decade later. Cherokee production has been happening since 2016.

What’s next? Talking heads at the UAW will surely have stern questions about that, given the mother ship’s better-than-expected profit numbers during the last calendar year. Speculation is centering on a shift to Mexico, though nothing’s official. Nor is there much word on what, if anything, is going to plug the hole Cherokee leaves in the Jeep lineup. With a focus on electrification, there’s a solid chance whatever this brand has in their hopper for the compact crossover segment will have so-called ‘4xe’ gubbins in some capacity.


[Images: Jeep, Facebook]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Analoggrotto Analoggrotto on Mar 02, 2023

    This was the same piece of crap where each transmission had to be tuned manually before shipment.

  • NJRide NJRide on Mar 03, 2023

    This model really captures Stellantis' malaise. It was essentially like the Dodge Journey, an outdated model that would only sell to fleet/substantial discount

  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
  • Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars
Next