Rare Rides: The 1985 MG Metro 6R4, a BL Rally Car Experiment

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Ever wanted a rally car from 1985 which is brand new and pieced together from an old hatchback? Well now’s your chance. Let’s take a look at the MG Metro 6R4.

By the late Seventies the Mini was showing its age, and the folks over at British Leyland realized it would eventually need replacement. The car they came up with was, in theory, similar to the Mini. It was front-drive, the engine was at the front, and it was very small. And focus groups hated it.

At the last moment BL redesigned their new car, made it larger, and altered its purpose: It would now sell alongside the Mini, rather than replace it. The new Metro (a name chosen by employees) went on sale in 1980. Though never achieving the cult following of the classic Mini, the Metro sold well enough to remain in production through 1998. By then it was called the Rover 100, but at times was also sold with Mini and Morris badges. Not much about the Metro was interesting, apart from a couple of very special versions made in the mid-Eighties.

At the time, BL needed a car to go racing at the World Rally Championship. The company had recently retired the rally versions of the TR7 and TR8. It was just as well, because about that time Audi showed up with their four-wheel drive rally car… and changed the game. The Austin Rover Motor Sport division saw the Quattro, took a look at the Metro, and an idea began to form. A Group B rally car was in order.

In the prototype stage by 1982, the finalized 6R4 version was shown to the media in 1984. The Metro’s original drive train was dumped, and replaced with a 3-liter V6 mounted in the middle of the car. Said engine was loosely based on a Cosworth unit, and was naturally aspirated. Just like Audi, the four-wheel drive system was permanent.

BL made 200 examples of a 250 horsepower road-legal version called the Clubman to satisfy WRC homologation rules. Beyond that, 20 more were built to actual Group B specification. The rally version had slightly more horsepower: 410.

Rover had the 6R4 on track by late 1985, but suffered engine issues after a strong initial showing at the Lombard RAC rally. Subsequent races never saw a 6R4 complete a course, usually due to engine issues. By mid-1986, Group B racing was finished — banned due to crashes which took the lives of drivers and spectators. The company withdrew the 6R4 from racing entirely at the end of 1986. BL’s efforts for the 6R4 were not for naught, though. The special V6 engine lived on, where a few years later it sprouted a couple of turbos and powered a car called the Jaguar XJ220.

Today’s Rare Ride is one of the 20 Group B cars. It was sold immediately to a collector who never drove or raced it. With seven total miles traveled since 1985, it’s ready to become static art in someone’s garage. It goes on sale at Silverstone on July 27th, and is estimated to fetch around $250,000.

[Images: Silverstone Auctions]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on Jul 09, 2019

    I guess they're looking for a REALLY devoted rally fan to cough up a quarter mil for this thing, ex museum piece or not. Best of luck with that!

  • Dan R Dan R on Jul 09, 2019

    A last ditch effort. Only attractive because of that.

  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
  • Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars
  • Ede65792611 Got one. It was my Dad's and now has 132K on it. I pay my Mercedes guy zillions of dollars to keep it going. But, I do, and he does and it's an excellent vehicle. I've put in the full Android panel for BT handsfree and streaming with a backup cam.
Next