Justice Department Launches Criminal Investigation Into Fiat Chrysler's Diesel Devices

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles started off the week in solid form. It deftly preempted the Detroit auto show by unveiling its futuristic Portal minivan concept at the youthful Consumer Electronics Show a week prior, then dangled a big Mopar tease in front of enthusiasts with its yet-to-be-revealed SRT Hellcat Demon variants of the Dodge Charger and Challenger.

Then, just like that, the Environmental Protection Agency held a media conference and FCA found its legs kicked out from under it. After Thursday’s accusation of emissions violations (via eight undeclared emissions control devices found on 3.0-liter EcoDiesel models), the automaker finds itself playing defense as controversy grows.

As the EPA’s investigation continues, the U.S. Department of Justice has now opened a criminal probe.

According to Bloomberg, the Justice Department wants to know why FCA didn’t tell the EPA about the devices during the certification process. The regulator claims the engines, found in 104,000 Ram 1500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles, emit illegal amounts of nitrogen oxide, and appear to operate in a leaner way only when undergoing emissions testing. If found in violation of the Clean Air Act, FCA could be on the hook for $4.6 billion in fines.

Forget checkered flags — this week was all about the red variety at FCA. Unfortunately for the automaker, it all comes during a week where six indictments fell on the heads of Volkswagen executives involved in that company’s diesel scandal.

The Bloomberg report claims FCA used emissions technology sourced from Robert Bosch GmbH — a supplier that provided software to Volkswagen for use on its illegal diesels. Bosch is under investigation for its role in that case.

FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne was quick out of the gate to deny the accusations, calling them “unadulterated hogwash,” but it didn’t stop the company’s stock — which was steadily on the rise — from taking a sharp dip. The company’s stock sat at $11.09 a share before the EPA revelation, but closed trading at $9.73 yesterday.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 58 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jan 16, 2017

    Why doesn't the EPA test these turbo gas engines under normal use? I think you'll they are spewing more particlates, noxious gases and CO2 than any EPA test standard. I'd like to see two vehicles of similar capability, say a 5.7 Hemi and VM diesel Ram put under the same loads/conditions driven together say around a major urban centre, some highway driving traversing a few hills and mountains monitored with readings and times giving info on how much real life difference there is between the 2 comparable vehicles. Don't use new vehicles, use vehicle with 20k on them as the should be oprrating near their optimum by then. Can TTAC organise this?

    • SSJeep SSJeep on Jan 17, 2017

      BAFO - they have done particulate and CO2 emissions on most engines in the US. The HEMI did not exceed any emission parameters in city or highway driving... The diesel oversights are due to NOx, which had not been part of the original testing setup for DEF equipped vehicles...

  • 05lgt 05lgt on Jan 16, 2017

    Bosch will not emerge unscathed. VW throwing itself on the sword may have bought them some time, but ... you can't sell dirty bombs to terrorists and claim you didn't know what they would do with them. Well, you can, it just doesn't keep you out of FITB prison with a cell mate who's daughter died from asthma related causes.

    • See 1 previous
    • OldManPants OldManPants on Jan 17, 2017

      @Lorenzo What a marvelous human nature parable. No good intention goes unabused.

  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
  • ToolGuy If I were a teen under the tutelage of one of the B&B, I think it would make perfect sense to jump straight into one of those "forever cars"... see then I could drive it forever and not have to worry about ever replacing it. This plan seems flawless, doesn't it?
  • Rover Sig A short cab pickup truck, F150 or C/K-1500 or Ram, preferably a 6 cyl. These have no room for more than one or two passengers (USAA stats show biggest factor in teenage accidents is a vehicle full of kids) and no back seat (common sense tells you what back seats are used for). In a full-size pickup truck, the inevitable teenage accident is more survivable. Second choice would be an old full-size car, but these have all but disappeared from the used car lots. The "cute small car" is a death trap.
  • W Conrad Sure every technology has some environmental impact, but those stuck in fossil fuel land are just not seeing the future of EV's makes sense. Rather than making EV's even better, these automakers are sticking with what they know. It will mean their end.
  • Add Lightness A simple to fix, strong, 3 pedal car that has been tenderized on every corner.
Next