Mini Clubman Shows Just How Maxi Brand Has Become

by Aaron Cole

Updated: December 31st, 2020 Published: September 16th, 2015

Mini unveiled its newest Clubman this week and the car, which is one foot longer and nearly 5 inches wider than the outgoing model, is now longer than a Jeep Wrangler.

The 14-foot-long four door will be four-inches shorter than a Mazda CX-3 and will sport the Hardtop’s duo of engines for Clubman and Clubman S models. The turbocharged I-3 will produce 134 horsepower in the Clubman, while the turbo four will bump up to 189 horsepower for the Clubman S. According to Mini, the Clubman S will sprint up to 60 mph in 7 seconds.

The Clubman is 10.9 inches longer than the 5-door Hardtop, with a 4-inch longer wheelbase and is nearly 3 inches wider. Rear passengers in the Clubman will get 2 more inches of legroom over the five-door Mini (34.3 vs. 32.3).

(And the five-door Hardtop exists, why?)

The Clubman will get BMW’s 8-speed automatic transmission as an option in the Clubman S, which was noticeably missing from the newest Hardtop. The Clubman will also get Dynamic Damper Control as an option, lifted from the Cooper S Hardtop.

According to the automaker, the Clubman will sport 17.5 cubes of room in the rear cargo area, increasing to 47.9 cubes with the rear seats folded down. The bar between the split opening rear doors has also shrunk, which should increase rear visibility in the ~~minivan~~ Clubman. The rear tail lamps are much larger and affixed to the symmetrical rear doors this time around.

The Clubman is the first model in Mini’s self-styled overhaul that was unveiled in June. In addition to the car, Mini will also roll out this year in the U.S. its car-sharing service that lets owners “rent” their own Minis when not in use.

The Mini Clubman will go on sale in the U.S. in January 2016, the automaker said. Pricing hasn’t been announced.

#Clubman #Cooper #CooperS #MINI

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 63 comments

Trackratmk1 on Sep 17, 2015

When the parent company tosses it's own brand identity to the wind, I can't say that I'm surprised that the MINI sub brand has fully lost it's identity within a short 12 years in USDM. But this should in so many ways be a great car for the internet. It's a fuel efficient, relatively fun to drive, brown wagon available in a stick! Just a shame that there is a MINI badge on it. The public will probably buy enough of these, but for me, even the regular hardtop is too ugly and bloated now. No more MINI's in my future. Signed, R56 MINI Cooper S owner

Like Reply
- Darex on Sep 17, 2015
  
  You say that now, but the reality is that many a defiant R56 owner, after having driven the F56, have changed their tune. North American Motoring is full of people like you, who said, "Never!" Besides, when the time comes for you to replace your R56, the same things that brought you to the MINI Brand in the first place, will bring you back again, as it did me; namely, all the boring other choices out there, the unique freedom to build the car as I wanted it to be, unencumbered by restrictive packages and lack of manual transmission availability, and the extremely good road manners (seating, steering, handling, etc...) that most other cars lack at this price point.
  
  Like
Chan on Sep 17, 2015

Why would anyone buy the 5-door Hardtop over this, if the prices are not too far apart?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
Lou_BC ???
Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars