Hyundai Ready To Add Capacity After Two-Year Break

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

After a two-year break in expansion mandated by Hyundai Motor Company Chairman Chung Mong-koo in order to avoid quality issues experienced by Toyota during their aggressive growing spurt in the 2000s, Hyundai and Kia are both looking through feasibilities studies to determine where to invest in expanding their manufacturing footprint.

Though the mandate is still in place, the expansion freeze is putting the pressure on both brands’ existing factories to produce more vehicles as it is. In 2013, Hyundai and Kia utilized 105 percent capacity of their factories around the globe, with those in the Southeastern United States running flat-out between 125 percent and 135 percent on two shifts per day.

Sources closes to the expansion plans noted the current ban, though highly beneficial to the parent automaker’s bottom line, is ultimately unsustainable for future success; Hyundai aims to sell nearly 8 million units globally in 2014, and expansion into Mexico and China — and possibly the U.S., though through a cautious approach due to tougher competition in a tight market — would help move the goal post past 8 million

The renewed interest in expansion comes as costs in labor and languid growth prospects in the automaker’s home market are prompting competitors — such as General Motors — to cut back on manufacturing and export, something Hyundai refuses to contemplate. Thus, the search for “investment opportunities” outside of a local market set to peak at 1.6 million sales annually through 2020 beginning in 2016, including three sites in China, whose local market could see 33 million to 38 million sales annually by 2020.

If approved, the fourth Chinese factory would be Hyundai’s first major manufacturing capacity investment since opening their third plant in 2012 alongside one in Brazil, both announced prior to the expansion ban in 2010 and 2008, respectively.

That said, Chung could veto any new expansion investment should such plans be presented.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Romismak Romismak on Feb 11, 2014

    I think Mexico plant should be announced pretty soon, they already began Mexico sales operatinos - finally - it was weird Hyundai wasn´t in Mexico officialy - under Chrysler just thanks to deal. I think Mexico plant would be logicall next step for Hyundai-Kia for NA region + from Mexico they can export in all corners of the world, because MEX has so many FTA deals with many countries, but at least they should make Hyundai-possibly even Kia cars mainly for US-Canada market, because their potential is bigger, they just can´t sell more in NA currently with their plant running at full capacity and with strong Won it is not so effective right now increas korean imports to NA. Also China is reality and in future i think they will add plant in ASEAN too, but i read interview with some top guy from Hyundai that it doesn´t make sense to have plant in ASEAN while there exports to this region are small so far, but unless you don´t have plant you can´t be big i think, Hyundai is decent player in Phillipines - No.3, but they are nothing in Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia - 3 biggest markets there.

  • Thegamper Thegamper on Feb 12, 2014

    I just thought I would post a comment since this seems to be such an unloved topic. Hyundai seems to keep its capacity pretty tight. I have looked at a few Hyundai's in the past and was really surprised by their unwillingness to deal on price and the fact that they dont even have lease programs on every car. It seems that Hyundai is not interested in playing the volume war with the Americans and Japanese. Good for them keeping inventory in check.

  • Plaincraig 1975 Mercury Cougar with the 460 four barrel. My dad bought it new and removed all the pollution control stuff and did a lot of upgrades to the engine (450hp). I got to use it from 1986 to 1991 when I got my Eclipse GSX. The payments and insurance for a 3000GT were going to be too much. No tickets no accidents so far in my many years and miles.My sister learned on a 76 LTD with the 350 two barrel then a Ford Escort but she has tickets (speeding but she has contacts so they get dismissed or fine and no points) and accidents (none her fault)
  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
  • ToolGuy If I were a teen under the tutelage of one of the B&B, I think it would make perfect sense to jump straight into one of those "forever cars"... see then I could drive it forever and not have to worry about ever replacing it. This plan seems flawless, doesn't it?
  • Rover Sig A short cab pickup truck, F150 or C/K-1500 or Ram, preferably a 6 cyl. These have no room for more than one or two passengers (USAA stats show biggest factor in teenage accidents is a vehicle full of kids) and no back seat (common sense tells you what back seats are used for). In a full-size pickup truck, the inevitable teenage accident is more survivable. Second choice would be an old full-size car, but these have all but disappeared from the used car lots. The "cute small car" is a death trap.
  • W Conrad Sure every technology has some environmental impact, but those stuck in fossil fuel land are just not seeing the future of EV's makes sense. Rather than making EV's even better, these automakers are sticking with what they know. It will mean their end.
Next