Some Bronco Owners Say Trail Turn Assist Killed Their Axles

by Chris Teague

Published: May 16th, 2023

some bronco owners say trail turn assist killed their axles

Trail Turn Assist is a cool Ford Bronco feature that brakes the inside rear wheel to tighten the turning radius and help the SUV navigate challenging off-road obstacles. Though helpful, some owners have reported that the feature could damage the vehicle.

At least two owners have taken to the Bronco6G.com forum in recent months to talk about Trail Turn Assist’s impact on their Bronco’s axles, claiming that the feature causes too much stress on the axle and related components. Some forum users responded with stories of others having the problem, stating that the solution is to weld around the broken attachment points, a fix that is neither practical nor acceptable for a new vehicle.

Some stated that their dealer refused to fix the component under warranty, with one saying the shop said the Bronco had aftermarket mods. Ford’s warranty language states that using the SUV in a manner described in the owner’s manual does not void the warranty, but it’s hard to know what happened before and after using Trail Turn Assist. The automaker also said that the feature is for use on loose or slippery surfaces and that using it on hard roads could increase tire wear and cause damage.

These sorts of issues are always tricky to sort out. On the one hand, it’s easy to jump on Ford for denying what seems like a straightforward warranty issue, but we have no idea how the SUVs were being used when they broke. If there were modifications, the warranty could have been voided before the owner used Trail Turn, but again, it’s almost impossible to accurately cast judgment without having been there.

[Image: Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#FordBronco #trailturnassist

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 27 comments

Redapple2 on May 17, 2023

I ll say this. American Axle or a Dana on my truck? I going dana all day - any day.

1 Reply
Wjtinfwb on May 17, 2023

I question some of these electronic features that, while easily enabled, can be very hard on the driveline. In addition to trail-turn, how about that line-lock feature on the 5.0 Mustangs? Or the "No-Lift" feature allowing you to keep the accelerator pinned while slamming through the gears. Or "launch mode" which optimizes revs while you dump the clutch and mat the gas pedal? Will be interesting to see how the manufacturers handle the inevitable claims from these otherwise cool features.

Like Reply
- CoastieLenn on May 22, 2023
  
  The thing with these features (largely) is that the ECM/TCM/BCM have counters for each of those modules. The dealership can easily tell if the car has either a) been launched 432 times in a single driving cycle [abuse] or b) has had the stored data cleared right before bringing the car in for repair [willful intent?]. Not to say that it will make it easier for the dealer to deny warranty claims, but it gives them ammo to use against the owner if they can prove neglect.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

ToolGuy My latest vehicle acquisition is slightly older than this one, same parent company, but has a full frame, rear-wheel drive and a longitudinally-mounted pushrod V8 gasoline engine. Almost like it was engineered and manufactured by a completely different group of people. Hmmm...
EBFlex Smart people
Wjtinfwb "Rovelo" tires? Good to see TTAC is not above the shameless commercial endorsement of unknown product like it's bigger print competitors.
Wjtinfwb Looks in decent nick for a Junkyard car. Other than the interior being partially gutted for some trim pieces, you could probably drive it out of the junkyard. Maybe a transmission issue and the cars value precluded a $2k or more fix? J cars were pathetic when introduced in '82 and never really got any better. But GM did sort out most of the reliability issues and with a modicum of maintenance these would run a long time if you could stand the boredom. Guess this owner couldn't.
GS340Pete I see a lot of these on the road. I can't remember the last time I saw one on my local Chevy dealership's lot. They've never in my memory had a few lined up with balloons. Short sighted to kill it off? Perhaps. But I certainly think the rows of $65k and up trucks is short sighted. That's going to bite soon. Looks like they're piling up already.And what about the Trax? Malibu or Trax? Gotta be honest, I'd pick the Trax.Although it should have 50 more HP IMHO. And why are so many preaching doom about the 'wet belt' engine?RIP, Malibu. Ride the highway in the sky with the Impala (talk about short sighted.)