Jim Farley: We’re Number One – In Recalls

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

It is a breath of fresh air to have someone like Jim Farley at the helm of an automaker. The man brings a bracing level of candor to a world generally filled with sanitized PR statements and corporate double-speak. In a candid call with investors, the CEO lamented about how Ford has been “number one in recalls” and the need “to improve product quality”.


These remarks come on the heels of Ford releasing its annual earnings report, one showing the Blue Oval had a net loss of $2 billion in the 2022 calendar year.


"While we generated a record cash flow,” Farley said, “We left about $2 billion of profit on the table due to costs and especially continued supply chain issues.”


However, unlike most other corner office execs, he refused to lay all troubles at the feet of that easy scapegoat.


"Ford has been the number one in recalls in the U.S. for the last two years," he told industry analysts after releasing the earnings report. "Clearly that's not acceptable." 


John Lawler, numbers wonk chief financial officer for Ford, estimated that successfully addressing some of the company’s quality woes could return billions on the balance sheet.


“With our quality numbers where they're at, we've said we have a significant opportunity on warranty,” he said, speaking to the potential to improve cost structure in that part of the company by about $2 billion. “That'll come in over time as quality improves,” Lawler explained.


So they’re nothing if not realistic. Elsewhere, Lawler detailed that the company is in good shape in terms of being able to keep the lights on despite last year’s performance, holding about $32 billion in cash and $48 billion in liquidity. Some of the losses in 2022 apparently came from sour investments, writing down its investments in Rivian by $7.4 billion and Argo AI by $2.8 billion last year. These numbers are making your author’s head hurt.


In sum, Ford says revenue rose about 16 percent last year to $158 billion, mainly thanks to better average transaction prices. They sold 4.2 million vehicles worldwide, up from 3.9 million in 2021, so the losses are not for want of customers. In fact, if not for these so-called ‘special expenses’ – which include the staggering losses relating to Rivian and Argo AI – those holding the spreadsheets say Ford would have posted a $10.4 billion profit rather than a $2 billion loss.


Execs remain bullish on many parts of the company, of course. An estimated 60 percent of Ford’s electric vehicle customers are new to the brand, with their EV growth coming at about twice the rate of the EV segment in general. Talent in software is said to have resulted in an outsized performance at that part of the company, and robust cashflow on the gas-powered side of the ledger means those vehicles are contributing profits and growth.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 57 comments
  • BklynPete BklynPete on Feb 06, 2023

    Maverick has had recalls but overall seems reliable. Consumer Reports recommends it for whatever that's worth, buyers think they're better than sliced bread, they're sold out, and look like a long-term success.


    I suppose you're right that DCT can be laid at Mulally's feet too but as COO Fields was in charge of product. When he got Mulally's job, Fields brought back mgmt siloes and lost shareholder value. Maybe Fields took the fall for other's bad decisions. But ultimately as CEO the axe had to land on him. I cannot believe that Farley won't meet the same fate if 2023 warranty claims make Ford lose money again.

    • Analoggrotto Analoggrotto on Feb 07, 2023

      Consumer Reports has been sucking up hard to Fjord for decades, I doubt anybody takes their automotive stats very seriously anymore.


  • BklynPete BklynPete on Feb 07, 2023

    Oh really? I don't recall the Fiesta and Focus getting recommendations when saddled with that awful DCT. Nor are the last generation Taurus or current Explorer and Escape on their recommended lists.

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next