Feeling the Pinch: Jeep Recalls 338k SUVs

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

In a new recall, some members of the Grand Cherokee family will require a dealership visit to sort out a problem with upper control arm pinch bolts which may have been damaged during vehicle assembly.

According to the company, approximately a quarter million Grand Cherokee L models from the 2021 – 2023 model years and roughly a further 88,000 standard-length Grand Cherokee SUVs assembled for the ’22 and ’23 model years are the target of this recall. It is suggested that only 1 percent of this number have the problem but, as will most campaigns of this type, they’re summoning all of them back to a service bay for checkups.


At issue is the amount of torque hammered into the aforementioned pinch bolts during assembly of these vehicles. Jeep says they combed through “vehicle production torque records” to identify a time period in which this was a problem, proving that car companies have way more data points available to them than they will ever admit. 


Torqueing procedures were apparently updated in May of last year, explaining why the problem suddenly vanished. Jeep also notes that similar vehicles not included in the recall were built at a different plant which had a “more robust torque strategy”. This author has decided to adopt that turn of phrase the next time he does a better job of twisting the cap on something like a bottle of Pepsi or jar of Kraft extra-crunchy peanut butter


For anyone keeping score, Jeeps claims to have shifted a total of 244,594 units of the Grand Cherokee last year alone. This is an entire 38 percent of the brand’s sales and stands in contrast to the 156,581 Wranglers (the brand’s next-best seller) which found homes last year. Combined, the Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer sold less than 40,000 examples. 


The company says that, as of January this year, it is not aware of any incidents or injuries potentially related to this issue for all markets.


[Image: Jeep]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 19 comments
  • The Oracle The Oracle on Mar 04, 2024

    Great, Jeep continues to push poor quality products on its customers.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 05, 2024

    Mopar Story Time: Youngest kid visited this past weekend and her 2010 Jeep Liberty was kind enough to stumble and throw a code just 1/2 mile from home as she was leaving (good job, Liberty! are we bonding now?). I grabbed the scanner and 'the book' (one of those "composition books" that has dates/mileage/maintenance notes, in theory) and we sat down to do some ciphering (but quickly, because she has places to go and things to do, now using spouse's vehicle).

    P0301, misfire cylinder 1 (misfire count 170! in a short time). Freeze Frame data corroborated the human's story, but much more precisely (28 mph, 29.4% throttle position). Just the one code (Yes!).

    What causes a misfire, but specific to one cylinder? (The coils are shared two cylinders to a coil.) There is a history of intermittent misfires with this vehicle, but trivial misfire counts and that was cylinder 2 (last time cylinder 1 registered a misfire was 4-5 years ago).

    Spouse says cylinder 1 spark plug is fouled or shorted (spoiler: checked it later, clean).

    I was curious to see the spark plug, but the Short Term Fuel Trim Bank 1 number on the Freeze Frame data was stuck in my mind: 18.8% (I like to see it under 3%). The engine computer was sending extra fuel to Bank 1 (cylinders 1/3/5) during the misfire event. 210K miles. Have we ever changed the injectors? (picture old man looking up to scan memory bank, coming up empty)

    Well my uncle the Automotive Diagnostic Genius (and Electrical Engineer) says "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." So I immediately ordered six fuel injectors, and six spark plugs, and six wires and three boots, and... three ignition coils (hesitated there but went for it). And then ordered a new compression tester because mine dates back to when I was 17. And a new '40K' air filter just because.

    Three weeks until the next vehicle swap. The last additive round seems to have 'cured' the oil consumption issue for now. The new tires get rave reviews and are wearing evenly.

    • See 3 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 06, 2024

      I went from Phoenix, Arizona

      All the way to Tacoma

      Philadelphia, Atlanta, L.A.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next